Skip to content

Support site Pulp server for image builds #490

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Jump to bottom
Merged
merged 50 commits into from
Dec 17, 2024
Merged

Support site Pulp server for image builds #490

merged 50 commits into from
Dec 17, 2024

Conversation

wtripp180901
Copy link
Contributor

@wtripp180901 wtripp180901 commented Dec 6, 2024 •
edited by sjpb
Loading

  • Added options to allow using a local Pulp server for DNF packages (but still using StackHPC Ark by default).
  • Includes an ad-hoc playbook to install/configure Pulp on an existing instance
  • Includes an ad-hoc playbook to sync defined Pulp snapshots with Ark.
  • Includes configuration to automatically sync Pulp snapshots on image build - this is untested.
  • Guards against injecting Pulp credentials (when using Ark directly) into cluster instances.

@wtripp180901
Copy link
Contributor Author

wtripp180901 commented Dec 6, 2024 •
edited
Loading

leafcloud site test: https://github.com/stackhpc/ansible-slurm-appliance/actions/runs/12199387002 (need to do full test with new nightly's at some point but this passing would be a good sign)

@wtripp180901
Copy link
Contributor Author

https://github.com/stackhpc/ansible-slurm-appliance/actions/runs/12201370568

@wtripp180901
Copy link
Contributor Author

https://github.com/stackhpc/ansible-slurm-appliance/actions/runs/12201486557

@wtripp180901
Copy link
Contributor Author

https://github.com/stackhpc/ansible-slurm-appliance/actions/runs/12201674382

@wtripp180901
Copy link
Contributor Author

test https://github.com/stackhpc/ansible-slurm-appliance/actions/runs/12281871288

@wtripp180901
Copy link
Contributor Author

https://github.com/stackhpc/ansible-slurm-appliance/actions/runs/12317015854 (no fatimage changes but nightly's for last build were funny)

@wtripp180901 wtripp180901 marked this pull request as ready for review December 13, 2024 14:09
@wtripp180901 wtripp180901 requested a review from a team as a code owner December 13, 2024 14:09
@wtripp180901 wtripp180901 requested a review from sjpb December 13, 2024 14:56
sjpb
sjpb requested changes Dec 13, 2024
View reviewed changes
@wtripp180901 wtripp180901 changed the title Use site Pulp server for images builds Support site Pulp server for images builds Dec 16, 2024
@wtripp180901 wtripp180901 changed the title Support site Pulp server for images builds Support site Pulp server for image builds Dec 16, 2024
@wtripp180901
Copy link
Contributor Author

https://github.com/stackhpc/ansible-slurm-appliance/actions/runs/12351955189

@wtripp180901 wtripp180901 requested a review from sjpb December 16, 2024 13:36
@wtripp180901
Copy link
Contributor Author

https://github.com/stackhpc/ansible-slurm-appliance/actions/runs/12356348160

@wtripp180901
Copy link
Contributor Author

https://github.com/stackhpc/ansible-slurm-appliance/actions/runs/12356576826

sjpb
sjpb requested changes Dec 17, 2024
View reviewed changes
@wtripp180901 @sjpb
docs suggestions
7fe3ca5 
Co-authored-by: Steve Brasier <[email protected]>
@wtripp180901 wtripp180901 requested a review from sjpb December 17, 2024 15:08
sjpb
sjpb approved these changes Dec 17, 2024
View reviewed changes
Copy link
Collaborator

@sjpb sjpb left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

LGTM

@wtripp180901 wtripp180901 merged commit f032ed9 into main Dec 17, 2024
5 of 6 checks passed
@wtripp180901 wtripp180901 deleted the feat/pulp-builds branch December 17, 2024 15:20
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Reviewers

@sjpb sjpb sjpb approved these changes

Assignees
No one assigned
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Milestone
No milestone
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.
2 participants
@wtripp180901 @sjpb