Skip to content

Conversation

bertiethorpe
Copy link
Member

No description provided.

@bertiethorpe bertiethorpe marked this pull request as ready for review February 17, 2025 12:11
@bertiethorpe bertiethorpe requested a review from a team as a code owner February 17, 2025 12:11
@bertiethorpe bertiethorpe requested a review from jovial February 17, 2025 12:11
jovial
jovial previously approved these changes Feb 25, 2025
@bertiethorpe bertiethorpe force-pushed the feat/lustre-compute-init branch from f3aa9a3 to 9953a03 Compare March 4, 2025 10:55
@sjpb sjpb self-requested a review March 4, 2025 11:14
Copy link
Collaborator

@sjpb sjpb left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

LGTM. Previously approved before rebase after testing at client. Not rebuilding image to include modified compute-init.yml playbook as a custom image is required to add the lustre client anyway.

@sjpb sjpb merged commit 8dc121a into main Mar 4, 2025
2 checks passed
@sjpb sjpb deleted the feat/lustre-compute-init branch March 4, 2025 11:17
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants