Skip to content

Foward port downstream Caracal patches to stackhpc/master#678

Closed
seunghun1ee wants to merge 1 commit intostackhpc/masterfrom
fowardport-caracal-to-master
Closed

Foward port downstream Caracal patches to stackhpc/master#678
seunghun1ee wants to merge 1 commit intostackhpc/masterfrom
fowardport-caracal-to-master

Conversation

@seunghun1ee
Copy link
Member

@seunghun1ee seunghun1ee commented Jan 31, 2025

No description provided.

@seunghun1ee seunghun1ee self-assigned this Jan 31, 2025
@seunghun1ee seunghun1ee requested a review from a team as a code owner January 31, 2025 16:05
@Alex-Welsh
Copy link
Member

Alex-Welsh commented Jan 31, 2025

I think we want the sb relay, but not sure whether we need caso or not

@Alex-Welsh
Copy link
Member

Alex-Welsh commented Feb 5, 2025 •
edited
Loading

Confirmed we need both.
We will probably have some more work to do to bring in the recent handler changes to the caso deployment tasks

Patches for reference:
https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/kolla-ansible/+/924145
https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/kolla-ansible/+/773243
https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/kolla-ansible/+/914997

@Alex-Welsh
Copy link
Member

Alex-Welsh commented Feb 6, 2025

Confirmed we need both. We will probably have some more work to do to bring in the recent handler changes to the caso deployment tasks

Patches for reference: https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/kolla-ansible/+/924145 https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/kolla-ansible/+/773243 https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/kolla-ansible/+/914997

Turns out we don't need cASO, which makes things way easier

@mnasiadka @seunghun1ee
ovn: Add support for OVN SB Relay
de72559 
Add support for deploying OVN SB relays [1].
This is enabled by default to improve large scale scenarios.

Default mechanism deploys one relay group per 50 ovn-controller hosts
and uses random but idempotent method to choose a relay for a given host.

neutron-server will connect directly to SB cluster, not via the relays.

[1]: https://docs.ovn.org/en/latest/tutorials/ovn-ovsdb-relay.html

Co-Authored-By: Krzysztof Tomaszewski <ktomaszewski@cloudferro.com>

Depends-On: https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/kolla/+/928898

Change-Id: Id7d6973668d8b2b194913b533f8cb756c6708536
(cherry picked from commit 7b95939)
@seunghun1ee seunghun1ee force-pushed the fowardport-caracal-to-master branch from 95f1aba to de72559 Compare February 6, 2025 11:13
@seunghun1ee
Copy link
Member Author

seunghun1ee commented Feb 6, 2025

Confirmed we need both. We will probably have some more work to do to bring in the recent handler changes to the caso deployment tasks
Patches for reference: https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/kolla-ansible/+/924145 https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/kolla-ansible/+/773243 https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/kolla-ansible/+/914997

Turns out we don't need cASO, which makes things way easier

cASO commit was dropped

Alex-Welsh
Alex-Welsh approved these changes Feb 6, 2025
View reviewed changes
Copy link
Member

@Alex-Welsh Alex-Welsh left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

lgtm, might be safest for someone with more KA experience to review as well

@priteau priteau requested review from bbezak and priteau February 6, 2025 14:28
@seunghun1ee
Copy link
Member Author

seunghun1ee commented Feb 24, 2025

@priteau @bbezak Could you have a look on this?

@bbezak
Copy link
Member

bbezak commented Feb 26, 2025 •
edited
Loading

SB relay will land in epoxy surely, and I think it also has changed a bit as well. Therefore I don't think we need this PR. Let's wait for upstream version.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Reviewers

@Alex-Welsh Alex-Welsh Alex-Welsh approved these changes

@priteau priteau Awaiting requested review from priteau

@bbezak bbezak Awaiting requested review from bbezak

Assignees

@seunghun1ee seunghun1ee

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Milestone

No milestone

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants

@seunghun1ee @Alex-Welsh @bbezak @mnasiadka