Skip to content

Conversation

@vicentepinto98
Copy link
Contributor

@vicentepinto98 vicentepinto98 commented Oct 10, 2024

Reverts #89

  • Tested an SDK generation dry-run and there are no breaking changes
  • Omitempty tag changes for read/writeOnly fields are still applied
  • Tested the usage of a nullable field (networkInterface in UpdatePublicIPPayload and it works as expected

@vicentepinto98 vicentepinto98 changed the title Add support for nullable fields again Re-add support for nullable fields Oct 10, 2024
@vicentepinto98 vicentepinto98 merged commit 2a6689c into main Oct 11, 2024
10 checks passed
@vicentepinto98 vicentepinto98 deleted the revert-89-jp/revert-nullable-utils branch October 11, 2024 17:25
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants