Skip to content

Conversation

@wileyj
Copy link
Collaborator

@wileyj wileyj commented Jan 30, 2026

- fixed issue with retrieving awk element for total blocks
- moved initial setup to create logs/tmux session separately
Copy link
Contributor

@brice-stacks brice-stacks left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

lgtm

@codecov
Copy link

codecov bot commented Jan 30, 2026

Codecov Report

✅ All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests.
✅ Project coverage is 68.98%. Comparing base (6c76d35) to head (2c8ea28).
⚠️ Report is 132 commits behind head on develop.

❌ Your project status has failed because the head coverage (68.98%) is below the target coverage (80.00%). You can increase the head coverage or adjust the target coverage.

❗ There is a different number of reports uploaded between BASE (6c76d35) and HEAD (2c8ea28). Click for more details.

HEAD has 30 uploads less than BASE
Flag BASE (6c76d35) HEAD (2c8ea28)
108 78
Additional details and impacted files
@@             Coverage Diff              @@
##           develop    #6839       +/-   ##
============================================
- Coverage    79.38%   68.98%   -10.41%     
============================================
  Files          593      593               
  Lines       358295   358295               
============================================
- Hits        284420   247154    -37266     
- Misses       73875   111141    +37266     

see 346 files with indirect coverage changes


Continue to review full report in Codecov by Sentry.

Legend - Click here to learn more
Δ = absolute <relative> (impact), ø = not affected, ? = missing data
Powered by Codecov. Last update 6c76d35...2c8ea28. Read the comment docs.

🚀 New features to boost your workflow:
  • ❄️ Test Analytics: Detect flaky tests, report on failures, and find test suite problems.
  • 📦 JS Bundle Analysis: Save yourself from yourself by tracking and limiting bundle sizes in JS merges.

Copy link
Contributor

@francesco-stacks francesco-stacks left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

lgtm!

@wileyj wileyj added this pull request to the merge queue Feb 11, 2026
Merged via the queue into stacks-network:develop with commit da8cd9a Feb 11, 2026
313 of 319 checks passed
@wileyj wileyj deleted the chore/update_validation_script branch February 11, 2026 18:33
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants