Skip to content
This repository was archived by the owner on Oct 26, 2021. It is now read-only.

Conversation

@BenjaminDiscoVergy
Copy link

The previous example was a bit ambigous:
It could have said:

The first responding observable is passed on.

Or it could have said:

The first incoming response is taken as first in the result. Then the second element in the result is taken from whatever observable provides its second element before all others provide their second element.

This can be understood with a bit of thinking and googling but the diagram should be as unambiguous as possible.

Moving the last 2 elements of the 'winning' observable further to the right clears up that ambiguity.

The previous example was a bit ambigous: 
It could have said: The first responding observable is passed on.
Or it could  have said: the first incoming response is taken as first in the result. Then the second element in the result is taken from whatever observable provides its second element before all others provide their second element.
Sign up for free to subscribe to this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in.

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant