Skip to content

Conversation

@jkeifer
Copy link
Member

@jkeifer jkeifer commented Apr 17, 2025

What I'm changing

  • Automatically set conformances (where possible) based on specified behaviors
  • Fix async to align with spec changes (to facilitate required conformance changes)
  • Make order statuses optional as it is an extension and not core

How I did it

  • With my mind?

Checklist

  • Tests pass: uv run pytest
  • Checks pass: uv run pre-commit run --all-files
  • CHANGELOG is updated (if necessary)

@jkeifer jkeifer requested a review from gadomski as a code owner April 17, 2025 22:59
@jkeifer jkeifer mentioned this pull request Apr 17, 2025
3 tasks
@jkeifer
Copy link
Member Author

jkeifer commented Apr 17, 2025

Argh, I needed to have sorted the conformances. I’ll get that change in shortly.

Copy link
Member

@gadomski gadomski left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Argh, I needed to have sorted the conformances. I’ll get that change in shortly.

Or we could just compare sets? Conformance order shouldn't matter ...

But in general changes LGTM!

@jkeifer jkeifer merged commit 412fd5b into conformance Apr 18, 2025
4 checks passed
@jkeifer jkeifer deleted the jak/conformance branch April 18, 2025 14:57
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants