apollo_deployments: use const non-default port for replacer configs

[Itay-Tsabary-Starkware]

No description provided.

[reviewable-StarkWare]

This change is 

[Itay-Tsabary-Starkware]

• apollo_deployments: cleanups #11571
• apollo_deployments: remove redundant files and their autogen fn #11393
• apollo_deployments: use const non-default port for replacer configs #11379 👈 (View in Graphite)
• main-v0.14.1-committer

This stack of pull requests is managed by Graphite. Learn more about stacking.

[github-actions]

Artifacts upload workflows:

• Started at 2026-01-04T09:03:54Z
• Started at 2026-01-04T13:01:32Z

[nadin-Starkware]

@nadin-Starkware reviewed 6 files and all commit messages, and made 1 comment.
Reviewable status: 6 of 25 files reviewed, 1 unresolved discussion (waiting on @Itay-Tsabary-Starkware).

---

crates/apollo_deployments/src/deployment_definitions.rs line 22 at r1 (raw file):

pub(crate) const INFRA_PORT_PLACEHOLDER: u16 = 1;
const_assert_ne!(INFRA_PORT_PLACEHOLDER, DEFAULT_INVALID_PORT);

Why not just use DEFAULT_INVALID_PORT?

Code quote:

pub(crate) const INFRA_PORT_PLACEHOLDER: u16 = 1;
const_assert_ne!(INFRA_PORT_PLACEHOLDER, DEFAULT_INVALID_PORT);

[Itay-Tsabary-Starkware]

@Itay-Tsabary-Starkware made 1 comment.
Reviewable status: 6 of 25 files reviewed, 1 unresolved discussion (waiting on @nadin-Starkware).

---

crates/apollo_deployments/src/deployment_definitions.rs line 22 at r1 (raw file):

Previously, nadin-Starkware (Nadin Jbara) wrote…

Why not just use DEFAULT_INVALID_PORT?

It has to be a different value, please see the usage in crates/apollo_deployments/src/service.rs below.

[nadin-Starkware]

@nadin-Starkware reviewed 18 files and resolved 1 discussion.
Reviewable status: 24 of 25 files reviewed, all discussions resolved (waiting on @nadin-Starkware).

[Itay-Tsabary-Starkware]

@Itay-Tsabary-Starkware reviewed 25 files and all commit messages.
Reviewable status: complete! all files reviewed, all discussions resolved (waiting on @Itay-Tsabary-Starkware).