Skip to content

Conversation

anandkaranubc
Copy link
Contributor

Progresses #365

Description

What is the purpose of this pull request?

This pull request:

  • Add tests for checking that acos(1), and acosh(1) are +0.

Related Issues

Does this pull request have any related issues?

This pull request:

Questions

Any questions for reviewers of this pull request?

No.

Other

Any other information relevant to this pull request? This may include screenshots, references, and/or implementation notes.

No.

Checklist

Please ensure the following tasks are completed before submitting this pull request.


@stdlib-js/reviewers

---
type: pre_commit_static_analysis_report
description: Results of running static analysis checks when committing changes.
report:
  - task: lint_filenames
    status: passed
  - task: lint_editorconfig
    status: passed
  - task: lint_markdown
    status: na
  - task: lint_package_json
    status: na
  - task: lint_repl_help
    status: na
  - task: lint_javascript_src
    status: na
  - task: lint_javascript_cli
    status: na
  - task: lint_javascript_examples
    status: na
  - task: lint_javascript_tests
    status: passed
  - task: lint_javascript_benchmarks
    status: na
  - task: lint_python
    status: na
  - task: lint_r
    status: na
  - task: lint_c_src
    status: na
  - task: lint_c_examples
    status: na
  - task: lint_c_benchmarks
    status: na
  - task: lint_c_tests_fixtures
    status: na
  - task: lint_shell
    status: na
  - task: lint_typescript_declarations
    status: na
  - task: lint_typescript_tests
    status: na
  - task: lint_license_headers
    status: passed
---
@stdlib-bot stdlib-bot added Math Issue or pull request specific to math functionality. Needs Review A pull request which needs code review. labels Apr 5, 2025
@anandkaranubc
Copy link
Contributor Author

image

acosPi is not yet implemented.

@stdlib-bot
Copy link
Contributor

stdlib-bot commented Apr 5, 2025

Coverage Report

Package Statements Branches Functions Lines
math/base/special/acos $\color{green}217/217$
$\color{green}+100.00\%$
$\color{green}12/12$
$\color{green}+100.00\%$
$\color{green}2/2$
$\color{green}+100.00\%$
$\color{green}217/217$
$\color{green}+100.00\%$
math/base/special/acosh $\color{green}217/217$
$\color{green}+100.00\%$
$\color{green}14/14$
$\color{green}+100.00\%$
$\color{green}2/2$
$\color{green}+100.00\%$
$\color{green}217/217$
$\color{green}+100.00\%$

The above coverage report was generated for the changes in this PR.

---
type: pre_commit_static_analysis_report
description: Results of running static analysis checks when committing changes.
report:
  - task: lint_filenames
    status: passed
  - task: lint_editorconfig
    status: passed
  - task: lint_markdown
    status: na
  - task: lint_package_json
    status: na
  - task: lint_repl_help
    status: na
  - task: lint_javascript_src
    status: na
  - task: lint_javascript_cli
    status: na
  - task: lint_javascript_examples
    status: na
  - task: lint_javascript_tests
    status: passed
  - task: lint_javascript_benchmarks
    status: na
  - task: lint_python
    status: na
  - task: lint_r
    status: na
  - task: lint_c_src
    status: na
  - task: lint_c_examples
    status: na
  - task: lint_c_benchmarks
    status: na
  - task: lint_c_tests_fixtures
    status: na
  - task: lint_shell
    status: na
  - task: lint_typescript_declarations
    status: na
  - task: lint_typescript_tests
    status: na
  - task: lint_license_headers
    status: passed
---
@kgryte kgryte added Tests Pull requests specifically adding tests. and removed Needs Review A pull request which needs code review. labels Apr 5, 2025
kgryte
kgryte previously approved these changes Apr 5, 2025
Copy link
Member

@kgryte kgryte left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

LGTM

@kgryte
Copy link
Member

kgryte commented Apr 5, 2025

@anandkaranubc Would you mind reconciling the merge conflicts here? Not sure whether both changes should be kept.

@kgryte kgryte added the Needs Changes Pull request which needs changes before being merged. label Apr 5, 2025
@anandkaranubc
Copy link
Contributor Author

@anandkaranubc Would you mind reconciling the merge conflicts here? Not sure whether both changes should be kept.

Yes, both changes should be there.

image

@anandkaranubc
Copy link
Contributor Author

/stdlib lint-autofix

@stdlib-bot stdlib-bot added the bot: In Progress Pull request is currently awaiting automation. label Apr 5, 2025
@stdlib-bot stdlib-bot removed the bot: In Progress Pull request is currently awaiting automation. label Apr 5, 2025
@Planeshifter Planeshifter added the Ready To Merge A pull request which is ready to be merged. label Apr 5, 2025
@stdlib-bot
Copy link
Contributor

PR Commit Message

test: add tests for IEEE 754-2019 compliance

PR-URL: https://github.com/stdlib-js/stdlib/pull/6561
Ref: https://github.com/stdlib-js/stdlib/issues/365

Co-authored-by: stdlib-bot <[email protected]>
Reviewed-by: Philipp Burckhardt <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Karan Anand <[email protected]>

Please review the above commit message and make any necessary adjustments.

@stdlib-bot stdlib-bot removed the Needs Changes Pull request which needs changes before being merged. label Apr 5, 2025
@Planeshifter Planeshifter merged commit 9211c88 into stdlib-js:develop Apr 5, 2025
29 checks passed
@anandkaranubc anandkaranubc deleted the ieee/acos branch April 7, 2025 14:50
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

Math Issue or pull request specific to math functionality. Ready To Merge A pull request which is ready to be merged. Tests Pull requests specifically adding tests.

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants