Skip to content

Conversation

aayush0325
Copy link
Member

Description

What is the purpose of this pull request?

This pull request:

Related Issues

Does this pull request have any related issues?

No.

Questions

Any questions for reviewers of this pull request?

No.

Other

Any other information relevant to this pull request? This may include screenshots, references, and/or implementation notes.

No.

Checklist

Please ensure the following tasks are completed before submitting this pull request.


@stdlib-js/reviewers

…se/*

---
type: pre_commit_static_analysis_report
description: Results of running static analysis checks when committing changes.
report:
  - task: lint_filenames
    status: passed
  - task: lint_editorconfig
    status: passed
  - task: lint_markdown
    status: na
  - task: lint_package_json
    status: na
  - task: lint_repl_help
    status: na
  - task: lint_javascript_src
    status: passed
  - task: lint_javascript_cli
    status: na
  - task: lint_javascript_examples
    status: na
  - task: lint_javascript_tests
    status: na
  - task: lint_javascript_benchmarks
    status: na
  - task: lint_python
    status: na
  - task: lint_r
    status: na
  - task: lint_c_src
    status: na
  - task: lint_c_examples
    status: na
  - task: lint_c_benchmarks
    status: na
  - task: lint_c_tests_fixtures
    status: na
  - task: lint_shell
    status: na
  - task: lint_typescript_declarations
    status: na
  - task: lint_typescript_tests
    status: na
  - task: lint_license_headers
    status: passed
---
@stdlib-bot
Copy link
Contributor

Coverage Report

Package Statements Branches Functions Lines
blas/ext/base/gsumkbn $\color{red}301/303$
$\color{green}+99.34\%$
$\color{red}20/21$
$\color{green}+95.24\%$
$\color{green}3/3$
$\color{green}+100.00\%$
$\color{red}301/303$
$\color{green}+99.34\%$
blas/ext/base/gsumpw $\color{red}379/395$
$\color{green}+95.95\%$
$\color{red}23/26$
$\color{green}+88.46\%$
$\color{green}3/3$
$\color{green}+100.00\%$
$\color{red}379/395$
$\color{green}+95.95\%$

The above coverage report was generated for the changes in this PR.

Copy link
Member

@kgryte kgryte left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

LGTM

@kgryte kgryte changed the title fix: remove redundant code in accessor array functions of blas/ext/base/* refactor: remove redundant code in accessor functions Feb 2, 2025
@kgryte kgryte added the BLAS Issue or pull request related to Basic Linear Algebra Subprograms (BLAS). label Feb 2, 2025
@kgryte kgryte merged commit 1d1e8b7 into stdlib-js:develop Feb 2, 2025
26 of 27 checks passed
Vinit-Pandit pushed a commit to Vinit-Pandit/stdlibMine that referenced this pull request Feb 4, 2025
saurabhraghuvanshii pushed a commit to saurabhraghuvanshii/stdlib-gs that referenced this pull request Feb 11, 2025
@aayush0325 aayush0325 deleted the fix-redundant-blas-accessor branch February 16, 2025 08:41
ShabiShett07 pushed a commit to ShabiShett07/stdlib that referenced this pull request Feb 26, 2025
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

BLAS Issue or pull request related to Basic Linear Algebra Subprograms (BLAS).

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants