Skip to content

feat: add stats/incr/nanmpe #6021

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Jump to bottom
Closed
wants to merge 9 commits into from
Closed

feat: add stats/incr/nanmpe #6021

wants to merge 9 commits into from
+819 −0

Conversation

hrshya
Copy link
Contributor

@hrshya hrshya commented Mar 13, 2025 •
edited
Loading

Resolves #5603 .

Description

What is the purpose of this pull request?

This pull request:

  • adds stats/incr/nanmpe .

Related Issues

Does this pull request have any related issues?

This pull request:

Questions

Any questions for reviewers of this pull request?

No.

Other

Any other information relevant to this pull request? This may include screenshots, references, and/or implementation notes.

No.

Checklist

Please ensure the following tasks are completed before submitting this pull request.

@stdlib-js/reviewers

@stdlib-bot stdlib-bot added Statistics Issue or pull request related to statistical functionality. Needs Review A pull request which needs code review. Good First PR A pull request resolving a Good First Issue. labels Mar 13, 2025
@stdlib-bot
Copy link
Contributor

stdlib-bot commented Mar 13, 2025 •
edited
Loading

Coverage Report

Package Statements Branches Functions Lines
stats/incr/nanmpe $\color{green}129/129$
$\color{green}+100.00\%$ 		$\color{green}8/8$
$\color{green}+100.00\%$ 		$\color{green}2/2$
$\color{green}+100.00\%$ 		$\color{green}129/129$
$\color{green}+100.00\%$

The above coverage report was generated for the changes in this PR.

hrshya added 2 commits March 13, 2025 16:09
@hrshya
Update test.ts
1d3114f 
Signed-off-by: Harsh <[email protected]>
@hrshya
Update test.js
52cfd20 
Signed-off-by: Harsh <[email protected]>
kgryte
kgryte reviewed Mar 22, 2025
View reviewed changes
kgryte
kgryte reviewed Mar 22, 2025
View reviewed changes
kgryte
kgryte reviewed Mar 22, 2025
View reviewed changes
kgryte
kgryte reviewed Mar 22, 2025
View reviewed changes
kgryte
kgryte reviewed Mar 22, 2025
View reviewed changes
lib/node_modules/@stdlib/stats/incr/nanmpe/examples/index.js Outdated
// For each simulated datum, update the mean percentage error...
console.log( '\nValue\tValue\tPercent\n' );
for ( i = 0; i < 100; i++ ) {
if ( randu() < 0.2 ) {
Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

You can apply similar example changes from the README here.

@kgryte kgryte added Feature Issue or pull request for adding a new feature. Needs Changes Pull request which needs changes before being merged. and removed Needs Review A pull request which needs code review. labels Mar 22, 2025
@kgryte kgryte mentioned this pull request Mar 22, 2025
Closed
1 task
hrshya and others added 6 commits March 23, 2025 18:30
@hrshya hrshya requested a review from kgryte March 23, 2025 13:14
@stdlib-bot stdlib-bot added the Needs Review A pull request which needs code review. label Mar 23, 2025
@hrshya hrshya closed this Oct 11, 2025
@hrshya hrshya deleted the feat/nanmpe branch October 11, 2025 13:40
@stdlib-bot stdlib-bot removed the Needs Review A pull request which needs code review. label Oct 11, 2025
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Reviewers

@kgryte kgryte Awaiting requested review from kgryte

Assignees

No one assigned

Labels

Feature Issue or pull request for adding a new feature. Good First PR A pull request resolving a Good First Issue. Needs Changes Pull request which needs changes before being merged. Statistics Issue or pull request related to statistical functionality.

Projects

None yet

Milestone

No milestone

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

[RFC]: add stats/incr/nanmpe

3 participants

@hrshya @stdlib-bot @kgryte