Skip to content

Conversation

Neerajpathak07
Copy link
Member

Resolves #6758 .

Description

What is the purpose of this pull request?

This pull request:

  • aims to migrate utils/none-in-by to object/none-in-by

Related Issues

Does this pull request have any related issues?

This pull request:

Questions

Any questions for reviewers of this pull request?

No.

Other

Any other information relevant to this pull request? This may include screenshots, references, and/or implementation notes.

No.

Checklist

Please ensure the following tasks are completed before submitting this pull request.


@stdlib-js/reviewers

This commit removes `@stdlib/utils/none-in-by` in favor of
`@stdlib/object/none-in-by`.

BREAKING CHANGE: remove `utils/none-in-by`

To migrate, users should update their require/import paths to use
`@stdlib/object/none-in-by` which provides the same API and implementation.

Ref: stdlib-js#6758
@stdlib-bot
Copy link
Contributor

stdlib-bot commented Apr 20, 2025

Coverage Report

Package Statements Branches Functions Lines
namespace/alias2pkg $\color{green}95/95$
$\color{green}+100.00\%$
$\color{green}7/7$
$\color{green}+100.00\%$
$\color{green}1/1$
$\color{green}+100.00\%$
$\color{green}95/95$
$\color{green}+100.00\%$
namespace/alias2standalone $\color{green}95/95$
$\color{green}+100.00\%$
$\color{green}7/7$
$\color{green}+100.00\%$
$\color{green}1/1$
$\color{green}+100.00\%$
$\color{green}95/95$
$\color{green}+100.00\%$
namespace $\color{green}95/95$
$\color{green}+100.00\%$
$\color{green}4/4$
$\color{green}+100.00\%$
$\color{green}1/1$
$\color{green}+100.00\%$
$\color{green}95/95$
$\color{green}+100.00\%$
namespace/pkg2alias $\color{green}100/100$
$\color{green}+100.00\%$
$\color{green}10/10$
$\color{green}+100.00\%$
$\color{green}1/1$
$\color{green}+100.00\%$
$\color{green}100/100$
$\color{green}+100.00\%$
namespace/pkg2standalone $\color{green}95/95$
$\color{green}+100.00\%$
$\color{green}7/7$
$\color{green}+100.00\%$
$\color{green}1/1$
$\color{green}+100.00\%$
$\color{green}95/95$
$\color{green}+100.00\%$
namespace/standalone2pkg $\color{green}95/95$
$\color{green}+100.00\%$
$\color{green}7/7$
$\color{green}+100.00\%$
$\color{green}1/1$
$\color{green}+100.00\%$
$\color{green}95/95$
$\color{green}+100.00\%$
object/every-in-by $\color{green}121/121$
$\color{green}+100.00\%$
$\color{green}11/11$
$\color{green}+100.00\%$
$\color{green}1/1$
$\color{green}+100.00\%$
$\color{green}121/121$
$\color{green}+100.00\%$
object/none-in-by $\color{green}117/117$
$\color{green}+100.00\%$
$\color{green}10/10$
$\color{green}+100.00\%$
$\color{green}1/1$
$\color{green}+100.00\%$
$\color{green}117/117$
$\color{green}+100.00\%$

The above coverage report was generated for the changes in this PR.

@Neerajpathak07 Neerajpathak07 marked this pull request as ready for review April 20, 2025 19:04
@stdlib-bot stdlib-bot added the Needs Review A pull request which needs code review. label Apr 20, 2025
@Neerajpathak07
Copy link
Member Author

@kgryte The extra commit as to address the lint error in an existing file similar to the earlier one as well.

@kgryte
Copy link
Member

kgryte commented Apr 25, 2025

@Neerajpathak07 Mind addressing the merge conflict? Likely applies to some of these other migration PRs due to recent doc fixes by Philipp.

@kgryte kgryte added release: Major Breaking change requiring a new major release. Needs Changes Pull request which needs changes before being merged. and removed Needs Review A pull request which needs code review. labels Apr 25, 2025
@kgryte kgryte changed the title feat: migrate utils/none-in-by to object/none-in-by feat!: migrate utils/none-in-by to object/none-in-by Jun 26, 2025
@kgryte kgryte removed the Needs Changes Pull request which needs changes before being merged. label Jun 26, 2025
@kgryte kgryte merged commit 1394ef5 into stdlib-js:develop Jun 26, 2025
16 checks passed
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

release: Major Breaking change requiring a new major release.

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

[RFC]: migrate utils/none-in-by to object/none-in-by

3 participants