-
-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 1.1k
build: add workflow to detect missing function database entries #9629
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
base: develop
Are you sure you want to change the base?
Conversation
---
type: pre_commit_static_analysis_report
description: Results of running static analysis checks when committing changes.
report:
- task: lint_filenames
status: passed
- task: lint_editorconfig
status: passed
- task: lint_markdown
status: na
- task: lint_package_json
status: na
- task: lint_repl_help
status: na
- task: lint_javascript_src
status: na
- task: lint_javascript_cli
status: na
- task: lint_javascript_examples
status: na
- task: lint_javascript_tests
status: na
- task: lint_javascript_benchmarks
status: na
- task: lint_python
status: na
- task: lint_r
status: na
- task: lint_c_src
status: na
- task: lint_c_examples
status: na
- task: lint_c_benchmarks
status: na
- task: lint_c_tests_fixtures
status: na
- task: lint_shell
status: passed
- task: lint_typescript_declarations
status: passed
- task: lint_typescript_tests
status: na
- task: lint_license_headers
status: passed
---
|
Warning Review the following alerts detected in dependencies. According to your organization's Security Policy, it is recommended to resolve "Warn" alerts. Learn more about Socket for GitHub.
|
| with: | ||
| title: 'Missing function database entries' | ||
| content-filepath: ./tracking_issue.md | ||
| # issue-number: TODO |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
What I thought here is, that once this workflow opens the issue, we can add that issue number here, and then that issue will keep on getting updated.
| for dir in lib/node_modules/@stdlib/math/base/special/*/ \ | ||
| lib/node_modules/@stdlib/number/float64/base/*/ \ | ||
| lib/node_modules/@stdlib/number/float32/base/*/ \ | ||
| lib/node_modules/@stdlib/number/float16/base/*/ \ | ||
| lib/node_modules/@stdlib/complex/float64/base/*/ \ | ||
| lib/node_modules/@stdlib/complex/float32/base/*/ \ | ||
| lib/node_modules/@stdlib/complex/float16/base/*/; do |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Keeping the directories as present here: https://github.com/stdlib-js/stdlib/blob/develop/.github/workflows/update_math_scaffold_databases.yml#L28
type: pre_commit_static_analysis_report
description: Results of running static analysis checks when committing changes. report:
Resolves None.
Description
This pull request:
float32scalar kernel oflog1pin unary function database #9452 (comment)Related Issues
None.
Questions
No.
Other
No.
Checklist
AI Assistance
If you answered "yes" above, how did you use AI assistance?
Disclosure
{{TODO: add disclosure if applicable}}
@stdlib-js/reviewers