Skip to content

Security: stealthsrc/security-hardening

Security

SECURITY.md

Security Policy

Thank you for helping keep security-hardening and its users safe. This repository ships security guidance and CI tooling that other projects copy into their own repos, so any defect in our content can have a wide blast radius. We treat reports seriously.

Supported Versions

This repository is documentation-first. The main branch is the only supported version. Forks of pinned references should pull updates from main to receive fixes.

Branch Supported
main Yes
Other No

Reporting a Vulnerability

Please do not open a public GitHub issue for security reports.

Use the private reporting channel below:

  1. GitHub Private Vulnerability Reporting (preferred) - open a report at https://github.com/stealthsrc/security-hardening/security/advisories/new

An alternate email channel should be published here only once it is monitored and tested end-to-end.

When reporting, please include:

  • A clear description of the issue and its impact (what an attacker could do, blast radius).
  • Affected file(s) and line numbers, or workflow job names.
  • Reproduction steps or a minimal proof of concept.
  • Your suggested remediation, if you have one.
  • Whether you would like public credit and how you wish to be named.

We will acknowledge receipt within 3 business days and aim to provide a status update within 7 days. We follow a coordinated disclosure model and will work with you on a fix and disclosure timeline (default 90 days, shorter for trivially exploitable issues).

Scope

In scope:

  • Anything in references/*.md that gives wrong or dangerous security advice (false positives that mislead users count).
  • Workflows under .github/workflows/ (privilege escalation, command injection, secret leak, supply chain).
  • The skill manifest SKILL.md and any prompt-injection vectors it could enable in agentic tools.
  • The .gitignore-security-template if it fails to exclude a known sensitive path.

Out of scope:

  • Theoretical attacks against an upstream vendor (report directly to the vendor).
  • Style, typos, and broken external links - open a normal issue or PR for those.
  • Vulnerabilities in third-party tools we merely reference (Gitleaks, Trivy, Semgrep, etc.).

Safe Harbor

We will not pursue legal action against researchers who:

  • Make a good-faith effort to follow this policy.
  • Do not exfiltrate data beyond what is necessary to demonstrate the issue.
  • Do not degrade service availability for other users.
  • Give us a reasonable time to remediate before any public disclosure.

Hall of Fame

We are happy to credit reporters in the published advisory. Let us know your preferred handle when you report.

There aren't any published security advisories