Skip to content

Conversation

@ghost
Copy link

@ghost ghost commented Mar 2, 2025

The installation instructions referenced 'libusb-1.0', but the correct package name is 'libusb-1.0-0'. In addition, the rpm package was added into the single-line commad that install all the required packages. .

The installation instructions referenced 'libusb-1.0', but the correct package name is 'libusb-1.0-0'. In addition, the rpm package was added into the single-line commad that install all the required packages. .
@Nightwalker-87 Nightwalker-87 assigned ghost Mar 3, 2025
@Nightwalker-87 Nightwalker-87 added this to the v1.8.1 milestone Mar 3, 2025
@Nightwalker-87 Nightwalker-87 moved this to In review in Release v1.8.1 Mar 3, 2025
@Nightwalker-87 Nightwalker-87 changed the title correct libusb package name in installation instructions [doc] Corrected libusb package name in installation instructions Mar 5, 2025
@Nightwalker-87 Nightwalker-87 merged commit 2215e94 into stlink-org:testing Mar 5, 2025
41 checks passed
@github-project-automation github-project-automation bot moved this from In review to Done in Release v1.8.1 Mar 5, 2025
@stlink-org stlink-org locked as resolved and limited conversation to collaborators Mar 5, 2025
Sign up for free to subscribe to this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in.

Projects

Status: Done

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant