Skip to content

Conversation

@vojtechtrefny
Copy link
Member

GLib really dislikes us calling 'g_variant_builder_end' on the empty array in this case.

Backport of #1125

GLib really dislikes us calling 'g_variant_builder_end' on the
empty array in this case.
@gemini-code-assist
Copy link

Summary of Changes

Hello @vojtechtrefny, I'm Gemini Code Assist1! I'm currently reviewing this pull request and will post my feedback shortly. In the meantime, here's a summary to help you and other reviewers quickly get up to speed!

This pull request resolves a bug in the lvm-dbus plugin that occurred when attempting to create a logical volume (lvcreate) without specifying any physical volumes. Previously, this scenario could lead to an incorrect call to g_variant_builder_end with an empty array, causing GLib to misbehave. The change introduces a defensive check to prevent this, ensuring the GVariantBuilder is only initialized when a non-empty list of PVs is provided. A corresponding test case has also been added to validate this fix.

Highlights

  • Bug Fix for lvcreate with empty PV list: Corrected an issue in the bd_lvm_lvcreate function where calling g_variant_builder_end with an empty array of Physical Volumes (PVs) could cause problems with GLib.
  • Robust Empty List Handling: Added a check for *pv_list to ensure the PV list is not empty before attempting to initialize the GVariantBuilder and iterate through PVs, preventing the problematic GLib call.
  • New Test Case: Introduced a new test in tests/lvm_dbus_tests.py to specifically cover the scenario of calling lvm_lvcreate with an empty list of PVs, ensuring the fix works as expected and prevents regressions.
Using Gemini Code Assist

The full guide for Gemini Code Assist can be found on our documentation page, here are some quick tips.

Invoking Gemini

You can request assistance from Gemini at any point by creating a comment using either /gemini <command> or @gemini-code-assist <command>. Below is a summary of the supported commands on the current page.

Feature Command Description
Code Review /gemini review Performs a code review for the current pull request in its current state.
Pull Request Summary /gemini summary Provides a summary of the current pull request in its current state.
Comment @gemini-code-assist Responds in comments when explicitly tagged, both in pull request comments and review comments.
Help /gemini help Displays a list of available commands.

Customization

To customize Gemini Code Assist for GitHub experience, repository maintainers can create a configuration file and/or provide a custom code review style guide (such as PEP-8 for Python) by creating and adding files to a .gemini/ folder in the base of the repository. Detailed instructions can be found here.

Limitations & Feedback

Gemini Code Assist may make mistakes. Please leave feedback on any instances where its feedback is incorrect or counter productive. You can react with 👍 and 👎 on @gemini-code-assist comments. If you're interested in giving your feedback about your experience with Gemini Code Assist for Github and other Google products, sign up here.

You can also get AI-powered code generation, chat, as well as code reviews directly in the IDE at no cost with the Gemini Code Assist IDE Extension.

Footnotes

  1. Review the Privacy Notices, Generative AI Prohibited Use Policy, Terms of Service, and learn how to configure Gemini Code Assist in GitHub here. Gemini can make mistakes, so double check it and use code with caution.

Copy link

@gemini-code-assist gemini-code-assist bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Code Review

This pull request correctly fixes a bug in bd_lvm_lvcreate that could lead to a crash when an empty list of PVs was provided. The change to the conditional check ensures that empty lists are handled properly, preventing an issue with g_variant_builder_end. The addition of a new test case in tests/lvm_dbus_tests.py is excellent, as it specifically covers this scenario and prevents future regressions. The changes are concise, correct, and well-tested.

@vojtechtrefny vojtechtrefny merged commit ebb17cb into storaged-project:2.x-branch Oct 6, 2025
4 of 17 checks passed
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants