Skip to content

Conversation

@dummdidumm
Copy link
Member

I resisted this previously because it felt a bit wasteful, but I now think that there's really no way around this: Instead of only going upwards the tree while matching, for :has we go down the tree to see what matches. More specifically, we're collecting the children of the current element and then check if one of those does match the selectors inside :has.

This makes the way the code works easier to reason about and also removes some boolean tracking we had to add for the previous approach.

Fixes #13779

Before submitting the PR, please make sure you do the following

  • It's really useful if your PR references an issue where it is discussed ahead of time. In many cases, features are absent for a reason. For large changes, please create an RFC: https://github.com/sveltejs/rfcs
  • Prefix your PR title with feat:, fix:, chore:, or docs:.
  • This message body should clearly illustrate what problems it solves.
  • Ideally, include a test that fails without this PR but passes with it.

Tests and linting

  • Run the tests with pnpm test and lint the project with pnpm lint

I resisted this previously because it felt a bit wasteful, but I now think that there's really no way around this: Instead of only going upwards the tree while matching, for `:has` we go _down_ the tree to see what matches. More specifically, we're collecting the children of the current element and then check if one of those does match the selectors inside `:has`.

This makes the way the code works easier to reason about and also removes some boolean tracking we had to add for the previous approach.

Fixes #13779
@changeset-bot
Copy link

changeset-bot bot commented Oct 23, 2024

🦋 Changeset detected

Latest commit: a809603

The changes in this PR will be included in the next version bump.

This PR includes changesets to release 1 package
Name Type
svelte Patch

Not sure what this means? Click here to learn what changesets are.

Click here if you're a maintainer who wants to add another changeset to this PR

@trueadm trueadm merged commit 5669b31 into main Oct 23, 2024
7 checks passed
@trueadm trueadm deleted the has-fix branch October 23, 2024 17:01
@github-actions github-actions bot mentioned this pull request Oct 23, 2024
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

False positive for "Unused CSS selector"

3 participants