Ease LiteLLM setup for examples #960
Merged
+23
−2
Conversation
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
carsonbot
changed the title
chr-hertel
force-pushed
the
litellm-setup
branch
from
fe4008a to
10a17c7
Compare
Member
Author
|
Still cannot make the example 
|
Member
|
I'm fixing usage of LiteLLM with ot without apikey (defined by master_key config entry). I'll push it as soon as my network connection allow it from my high-speed train! |
Member
|
@chr-hertel I pushed a commit here, it should work (it's ok on my setup) |
Contributor
|
rebase needed to fix lowest job |
OskarStark
force-pushed
the
litellm-setup
branch
from
2b79a41 to
67637b9
Compare
Contributor
|
I rebased and squashed the commits into one to be able to use |
Contributor
|
Thank you Christopher. |
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
4 participants
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Trying to get this started as example for #938.
@welcoMattic does that make sense to you? was just wondering if there's a different way than another postgres container