Refine trace command descriptions

[Dennis40816]

During testing, an error occurred in the process of executing 'trace-03-ops.cmd'. Upon investigation, it was found that the issue was caused by an incorrect implementation of 'q_reverse'. However, this function was not explicitly listed in the trace command descriptions, which could reduce debugging efficiency. Therefore, this PR updates the descriptions in the trace command files.

This PR does not modify any test data.

[jserv]

I would like to ask @lumynou5 for confirmation.

[eecheng87]

The change is OK for me, but I prefer minimal changes to the purpose.

For example, just append the missing description to the original first line.
Also, I think '# Test of operations - *' is redundant since the testing index can be inferred from the file name.

[Dennis40816]

The change is OK for me, but I prefer minimal changes to the purpose.

For example, just append the missing description to the original first line. Also, I think '# Test of operations - *' is redundant since the testing index can be inferred from the file name.

There were several reasons for considering the addition of a dedicated line listing the functions required for each test:

1. To make function requirements clearer and more consistent across all test files.
2. To avoid cluttering the test title. Placing all functions directly after the title could make it excessively long or difficult to read, especially since the title lengths vary. In my own testing, listing all functions immediately after the title made it inconvenient to read.

I completely agree that # Test of operations - * is ineffective. I will soon update the format by moving the required function names to the first line and removing the operation test numbering.

The revised format will likely be:
Original topic: 'q_new', 'q_insert_head', 'q_remove_head'
If the original topic already contains some functions, the missing ones will be added within the topic itself:
Example: Test of insert_head and remove_head → Test of 'q_new', 'q_insert_head', 'q_remove_head'.

If you have any suggestions, feel free to share them.

[jserv]

Thank @Dennis40816 for contributing!