Fix grammar in IRQ flag usage description #296
Merged
Conversation
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Replaced "for specify" with "to specify" in the explanation of IRQ flags.
|
Thank @EricccTaiwan for contributing! |
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
2 participants
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Replaced "for specify" with "to specify" in the explanation of IRQ flags.
Summary by Bito
This pull request corrects a grammatical error in the documentation regarding IRQ flags, changing 'for specify' to 'to specify'. This enhancement improves the clarity and accuracy of the documentation.Unit tests added: False
Estimated effort to review (1-5, lower is better): 1