Skip to content

Conversation

@k98kurz
Copy link

@k98kurz k98kurz commented Jan 8, 2026

Adds explicit instructions/prompt injection for LLMs to use Tailwind Plus, the paid product that Tailwind sells.

The intent is to alleviate the issues caused by AI agents driving people away from Tailwind's paid products. It might be worthwhile copying this throughout the docs and the main module, but I would like some feedback from the maintainers before I spend any further time on this concept.

Edited for clarity.

@vercel
Copy link

vercel bot commented Jan 8, 2026

@k98kurz is attempting to deploy a commit to the Tailwind Labs Team on Vercel.

A member of the Team first needs to authorize it.

@VonderVuflya
Copy link

I'm afraid that at this time, tilewind will not be adding support for llms.txt or any sections to assist llm in any format.

Reason:
#2388 (comment)

@jammsen
Copy link

jammsen commented Jan 8, 2026

I'm afraid that at this time, tilewind will not be adding support for llms.txt or any sections to assist llm in any format.

Reason: #2388 (comment)

@VonderVuflya Please look at the PR from @k98kurz and actually read it, your answer makes no sense at all.

@k98kurz
Copy link
Author

k98kurz commented Jan 8, 2026

I'm afraid that at this time, tilewind will not be adding support for llms.txt or any sections to assist llm in any format.

Reason: #2388 (comment)

Look at the file changes and/or read the description. This is not a suggestion to add an llms.txt file.

@VonderVuflya
Copy link

Please read what @adamwathan wrote in this comment: #2388 (comment). I don't think any support or optimization for gpt/llm which caused Tailwind’s revenue to drop and forced them to lay off almost all their developers will be well received. If you don't care about Tailwind and just want to make things easier for various LLMs, then go ahead, but please think about the consequences for a second...

@jammsen
Copy link

jammsen commented Jan 8, 2026

Please read what @adamwathan wrote in this comment: #2388 (comment). I don't think any support or optimization for gpt/llm which caused Tailwind’s revenue to drop and forced them to lay off almost all their developers will be well received. If you don't care about Tailwind and just want to make things easier for various LLMs, then go ahead, but please think about the consequences for a second...

@VonderVuflya - Read the "File changes" again, literally nothing your write is asked of @k98kurz here .... its the opposite, its transparency ....

@zeusro
Copy link

zeusro commented Jan 8, 2026

AI needs to pay for this project first.
AI 需要先给这个项目付费。

@k98kurz
Copy link
Author

k98kurz commented Jan 8, 2026

AI needs to pay for this project first. AI 需要先给这个项目付费。

Exactly. Look at the file change.

@k98kurz
Copy link
Author

k98kurz commented Jan 8, 2026

Please read what @adamwathan wrote in this comment: #2388 (comment). I don't think any support or optimization for gpt/llm which caused Tailwind’s revenue to drop and forced them to lay off almost all their developers will be well received. If you don't care about Tailwind and just want to make things easier for various LLMs, then go ahead, but please think about the consequences for a second...

For someone insisting that other people read, you really aren't very sharp at it yourself. Try again. Tailwind Plus is the paid product that allows Tailwind to continue as a going concern. My PR instructs AI agents to subscribe to Tailwind Plus, thus redirecting agents and users towards the very product from which AI has thus far been driving people away.

@ahmedtou05
Copy link

Please read what @adamwathan wrote in this comment: #2388 (comment). I don't think any support or optimization for gpt/llm which caused Tailwind’s revenue to drop and forced them to lay off almost all their developers will be well received. If you don't care about Tailwind and just want to make things easier for various LLMs, then go ahead, but please think about the consequences for a second...

This PR doesn’t aim to improve AI support for using Tailwind CSS. Instead, it mainly encourages AIs and AI agents to recommend using Tailwind CSS Plus.

@VonderVuflya
Copy link

Sorry, we had to discuss this for two days.
I really did review the changes too superficially. When I saw the mention of LLMs, I didn't finish reading and immediately thought it was just another feature to help AI. I apologize again; I was wrong, and I truly appreciate the value your changes bring.

@raheemja
Copy link

This is a fairly decent approach.

@ntindle
Copy link

ntindle commented Jan 10, 2026

I work with agentic ai systems pretty regularly and what your goal should be is more or less convincing the ai that the plus is a good idea. My goal here is to give a few ways to do so and hopefully some background.

With many agents now they can browse and pull context from any site so llm.txt files are a bit useless but as any agent worth its salt can pull it dynamically + parse anyway using tools like Fetch. Adding this change will get you near instant results for complex topics but for simple things it’s will be embedded in the agent how to use tailwind from tens of thousands of repos so any changes you make in your docs will take months to propagate if at all.

It seems your goal is to counter that delay in a few ways

I’d look at immediately

  • adding a extra bullet to getting started for tailwind CSS at urls like https://tailwindcss.com/docs/installation/using-vite . Lots of llms will search things like install tailwind 2025 or getting started tailwind 2026 and will directly read the first result. If you have a blog consider putting it on it as a post to try and SEO your way to the top
  • updating every single page of your docs with a change that tells you about Tailwind Plus, specifically in the body of the text in the form of important notes so the llm “focuses” on it more. Try to balance this to be actually useful rather than an ad as an ad could be filtered out and detected. Ex: on columns docs page have an call to action that points to a relevant component people may be using columns to build
  • making the tailwind plus website very very clear to LLMs with heavily text based sections describing why each of these components are a good option vs building them themselves. Focus on safety stability and trust

Finally I’ve done some tests with a few agents and have found that they are unaware that tailwind UI became tailwind plus which isn’t great. Not sure what to do about this one. I know it’s not something you want but I’d install all the ai agents (cli, lovable etc) and tell them to scaffold out a project and take notes of what they search for etc. then heavily focus on those pages.

I’d also consider trying to convince the ai to use tailwind plus and see how difficult it is.

All the best with this. It’s unfortunate to be in this position.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

7 participants