Skip to content

Conversation

@xiao-77
Copy link
Contributor

@xiao-77 xiao-77 commented Feb 9, 2026

Description

Issue(s)

  • Close/close/Fix/fix/Resolve/resolve: Issue Link

Checklist

Please check the items in the checklist if applicable.

  • Is the user manual updated?
  • Are the test cases passed and automated?
  • Is there no significant decrease in test coverage?

@xiao-77 xiao-77 requested a review from a team as a code owner February 9, 2026 02:45
Copilot AI review requested due to automatic review settings February 9, 2026 02:45
@gemini-code-assist
Copy link
Contributor

Summary of Changes

Hello @xiao-77, I'm Gemini Code Assist1! I'm currently reviewing this pull request and will post my feedback shortly. In the meantime, here's a summary to help you and other reviewers quickly get up to speed!

This pull request addresses a potential flakiness in a test case by extending the waiting period for a database flush operation to complete. By increasing the timeout, the test is given ample time to verify the state of tables after a flush, thereby preventing failures that might arise from timing issues rather than actual functional defects.

Highlights

  • Test Case Timeout Adjustment: The timeout duration for the wait_query call within the ttl_check_insert method of the test_table_param_ttl.py test file has been significantly increased. The waiting period after a flush database db operation was extended from timeout + 5 seconds to timeout + 60 seconds.

🧠 New Feature in Public Preview: You can now enable Memory to help Gemini Code Assist learn from your team's feedback. This makes future code reviews more consistent and personalized to your project's style. Click here to enable Memory in your admin console.

Changelog
  • test/cases/04-SuperTables/01-Create/test_table_param_ttl.py
    • Increased the timeout value in the wait_query function from timeout + 5 to timeout + 60 after a flush database db command in the ttl_check_insert method.
Activity
  • The author xiao-77 created this pull request with the stated intention of fixing a test case timeout.
  • The pull request description includes a checklist for manual updates, test cases, and test coverage, all of which are currently unchecked.
Using Gemini Code Assist

The full guide for Gemini Code Assist can be found on our documentation page, here are some quick tips.

Invoking Gemini

You can request assistance from Gemini at any point by creating a comment using either /gemini <command> or @gemini-code-assist <command>. Below is a summary of the supported commands on the current page.

Feature Command Description
Code Review /gemini review Performs a code review for the current pull request in its current state.
Pull Request Summary /gemini summary Provides a summary of the current pull request in its current state.
Comment @gemini-code-assist Responds in comments when explicitly tagged, both in pull request comments and review comments.
Help /gemini help Displays a list of available commands.

Customization

To customize Gemini Code Assist for GitHub experience, repository maintainers can create a configuration file and/or provide a custom code review style guide (such as PEP-8 for Python) by creating and adding files to a .gemini/ folder in the base of the repository. Detailed instructions can be found here.

Limitations & Feedback

Gemini Code Assist may make mistakes. Please leave feedback on any instances where its feedback is incorrect or counter productive. You can react with 👍 and 👎 on @gemini-code-assist comments. If you're interested in giving your feedback about your experience with Gemini Code Assist for Github and other Google products, sign up here.

You can also get AI-powered code generation, chat, as well as code reviews directly in the IDE at no cost with the Gemini Code Assist IDE Extension.

Footnotes

  1. Review the Privacy Notices, Generative AI Prohibited Use Policy, Terms of Service, and learn how to configure Gemini Code Assist in GitHub here. Gemini can make mistakes, so double check it and use code with caution.

Copy link
Contributor

@gemini-code-assist gemini-code-assist bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Code Review

This pull request increases the timeout in a test case to prevent flakiness, likely caused by a flush operation taking longer than expected. The change is straightforward, but introduces a magic number. I've added a comment to suggest extracting this number into a named variable to improve code readability and maintainability.

Copy link
Contributor

Copilot AI left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Pull request overview

This PR updates a TTL-related test to wait longer for post-flush database effects to complete, reducing test flakiness when tables are expected to be dropped.

Changes:

  • Increased the wait_query() timeout buffer in ttl_check_insert() from timeout + 5 to timeout + 60.

💡 Add Copilot custom instructions for smarter, more guided reviews. Learn how to get started.

@guanshengliang guanshengliang merged commit 425f7a7 into main Feb 9, 2026
19 of 22 checks passed
@guanshengliang guanshengliang deleted the fix/maim/ttl_ut branch February 9, 2026 14:40
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants