-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 8
Editorial: Add calendar authority for Japanese Imperial era names #79
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
base: main
Are you sure you want to change the base?
Conversation
spec.emu
Outdated
<tr> | ||
<td>*"japanese"*</td> | ||
<td>Japanese Imperial calendar, era system hybridised with *"gregory"*. Month numbers, month codes, and days are the same as in the ISO 8601 calendar, extended proleptically before their introduction in ISO year 1873. Imperial era names only extend as far back as the Meiji period (starting in ISO year 1868) during which calendar reforms took place. The arithmetic year, and the years and eras before ISO year 1868, are identical to *"gregory"*.</td> | ||
<td>Japanese Imperial calendar, era system hybridised with *"gregory"*. Month numbers, month codes, and days are the same as in the ISO 8601 calendar, extended proleptically before their introduction in ISO year 1873. Imperial era names only extend as far back as the Meiji period (starting in ISO year 1868) during which calendar reforms took place. All era names are defined by the Japanese government. The arithmetic year, and the years and eras before ISO year 1868, are identical to *"gregory"*.</td> |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Maybe "Modern era names are defined..."? (The decision to use era names only since 1868 is JS's concession to practical implementation concerns, and bce
/ce
are not defined by the Japanese government)
spec.emu
Outdated
<tr> | ||
<td>*"japanese"*</td> | ||
<td>Japanese Imperial calendar, era system hybridised with *"gregory"*. Month numbers, month codes, and days are the same as in the ISO 8601 calendar, extended proleptically before their introduction in ISO year 1873. Imperial era names only extend as far back as the Meiji period (starting in ISO year 1868) during which calendar reforms took place. The arithmetic year, and the years and eras before ISO year 1868, are identical to *"gregory"*.</td> | ||
<td>Japanese Imperial calendar, era system hybridised with *"gregory"*. Month numbers, month codes, and days are the same as in the ISO 8601 calendar, extended proleptically before their introduction in ISO year 1873. Imperial era names only extend as far back as the Meiji period (starting in ISO year 1868) during which calendar reforms took place. All era names are defined by the Japanese government. The arithmetic year, and the years and eras before ISO year 1868, are identical to *"gregory"*.</td> |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
CLDR defines the era names, which are transliterations of the ones defined by the government of Japan, which defines both the eras and their cutoff dates.
eras are as defined by CLDR
01f1841
to
9c01568
Compare
Updated to reflect that CLDR, rather than the Japanese government, is the authority for era name transliterations. Retitled as editorial, since I believe t doesn't change any observable requirements. |
Added wording specifying that Japanese Imperial era names are defined by the Japanese government.
See The Historical Background of How Japan Chooses Its Era Names. Key quote:
Also see description of the Japanese Imperial calendar system used in documentation for Java's JapaneseEra class: