Skip to content

Conversation

@ptomato
Copy link
Collaborator

@ptomato ptomato commented Jan 7, 2026

This bit of the description was inaccurate. It's not fully possible to merge the [[Month]] and [[MonthCode]] fields in lunisolar calendars, without the overflow parameter.

This bit of the description was inaccurate. It's not fully possible to
merge the [[Month]] and [[MonthCode]] fields in lunisolar calendars,
without the overflow parameter.
@codecov
Copy link

codecov bot commented Jan 7, 2026

Codecov Report

✅ All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests.
✅ Project coverage is 97.39%. Comparing base (9e63759) to head (a90172b).

Additional details and impacted files
@@           Coverage Diff           @@
##             main    #3244   +/-   ##
=======================================
  Coverage   97.39%   97.39%           
=======================================
  Files          22       22           
  Lines       10397    10397           
  Branches     1828     1828           
=======================================
  Hits        10126    10126           
  Misses        247      247           
  Partials       24       24           

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

🚀 New features to boost your workflow:
  • ❄️ Test Analytics: Detect flaky tests, report on failures, and find test suite problems.
  • 📦 JS Bundle Analysis: Save yourself from yourself by tracking and limiting bundle sizes in JS merges.

…elds

See tc39/proposal-intl-era-monthcode#107. This
changes the general outline of the ISO8601 part of CalendarResolveFields
so that it parallels the outline of NonISOResolveFields in the Intl Era
Monthcode proposal.
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants