Skip to content

Conversation

@nikki-dag
Copy link
Contributor

@nikki-dag nikki-dag commented Jan 9, 2025

temporalio/api#508 (comment)

Tested with my PR branch:
image

@nikki-dag nikki-dag marked this pull request as ready for review January 9, 2025 20:55
@nikki-dag nikki-dag requested review from anekkanti and cretz January 9, 2025 20:56
Comment on lines 5 to 8
branches:
- master
Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Even though this has no tags yet, we should consider still triggering on them for the one day it actually might

Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Updated ✅ (Assuming our version tags will also start with v)

Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Yes we have started cutting release tags now, lets make sure we push them to buf too.

buf.yaml Outdated
@@ -1,4 +1,5 @@
version: v1
name: buf.build/temporalio/api-cloud
Copy link
Member

@cretz cretz Jan 9, 2025

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

As part of internal discussions concerning the future of cloud repos, I have proposed that if/when we get to multiple cloud-specific developer experience repos, they would all be prefixed with cloud- which includes renaming this repository to cloud-api instead of api-cloud. I wonder if we should think about making the buf repo as cloud-api now or at least confirm that we don't think it'll be too harmful to users if/when we do it later (but before cloud API is considered stable).

Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

If we eventually rename this repo to cloud-api, it makes sense to me to name the buf registry cloud-api now. What do you think, @anekkanti?

Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

To clarify, this decision has not been made, it is part of a proposal under discussion internally along with other things. It's possible it never gets renamed.

Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

The repo has been changed to cloud-api. @nikki-dag please go ahead and change the buf registry to cloud-api as well.

@nikki-dag nikki-dag force-pushed the nikki/publish-to-buf branch from e806ca7 to 0e533bb Compare January 9, 2025 23:46
@anekkanti anekkanti merged commit 7327c73 into main Feb 19, 2025
4 checks passed
@anekkanti anekkanti deleted the nikki/publish-to-buf branch February 19, 2025 18:42
@anekkanti anekkanti restored the nikki/publish-to-buf branch February 19, 2025 19:12
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants