-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 141
Add start_update_with_start_workflow to Otel Interceptor #1150
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Merged
Merged
Changes from 7 commits
Commits
Show all changes
10 commits
Select commit
Hold shift + click to select a range
5b8285c
initial draft of fix
VegetarianOrc 0ceab44
remove debug printing
VegetarianOrc f373d7e
update comment about fan out to specify operation rather than command…
VegetarianOrc f9785e4
remove copy/pasted todo
VegetarianOrc 5486f46
Clean up test a little bit
VegetarianOrc 6ab9c19
move header fan out outside of try block
VegetarianOrc a4b69d8
Merge branch 'main' into otel/add-update-with-start
VegetarianOrc 767228b
Revert changes to client as they are unecessary. Inject otel headers …
VegetarianOrc 2d41030
set otel header value directly in update_workflow_input to avoid the …
VegetarianOrc 073c572
Merge branch 'main' into otel/add-update-with-start
VegetarianOrc File filter
Filter by extension
Conversations
Failed to load comments.
Loading
Jump to
Jump to file
Failed to load files.
Loading
Diff view
Diff view
There are no files selected for viewing
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Oops, something went wrong.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Uh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Unlike some other SDKs, this SDK chose to break apart the input into start and update classes, and put headers in each of those. Can you just use those instead of adding a third new header field to this set of input? Yes, it may mean copying the OTel header to a second place in the OTel interceptor, but that makes more sense than to add a new header field for everyone unnecessarily that force overwrites the more specific ones.