-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 137
chore: update core #1807
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
base: main
Are you sure you want to change the base?
chore: update core #1807
Conversation
45078d0 to
546c149
Compare
ab40243 to
cb60d7c
Compare
| stickyQueueScheduleToStartTimeout: '10s', | ||
| maxHeartbeatThrottleInterval: '60s', | ||
| defaultHeartbeatThrottleInterval: '30s', | ||
| skipClientWorkerSetCheck: false, |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Should we be worried about defaulting this to false? I see we had to explicitly set this to true in many of our tests. Is there any risk that this might break users deployments or CIs?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
CIs may break if their tests are running in parallel and using the same default namespace + task queue + same client, Would that be considered a breaking change? This path is now an error, whereas previously it just ignored duplicate registrations. Tests don't care about this req, but now they'll hit errors. Not sure if TS runs their tests in parallel, but rust hit this error in tests
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I took this from the PR that bumped this in Python: https://github.com/temporalio/sdk-python/pull/1157/files#diff-71bb79f8f6f7277331d9df6e0c1de02a9b08a91977289ddf876398e8ad5a8d53R151
@yuandrew is this a concern?
What was changed
TSIA
Why?
With the code moving, updating core is more involved than usual. Doing this in a separate PR to make it easier to review.
Checklist
Closes N/A
How was this tested:
Existing tests
Any docs updates needed?
I do not believe so