Skip to content

Conversation

ebachle
Copy link
Contributor

@ebachle ebachle commented Feb 18, 2025

Description

The karpenter submodule's variable node_iam_role_use_name_prefix currently implies in the variable description that it will use the controller IAM role name (iam_role_name), but the code actually uses the node_iam_role_name for the prefix, if enabled.

Motivation and Context

I believe this is a v19->v20 mistaken holder.
I didn't create an issue, but can if necessary.

Breaking Changes

Nope

How Has This Been Tested?

Docs only change.

  • I have executed pre-commit run -a on my pull request

@ebachle ebachle changed the title docs: update description of karpenter node_iam_role_use_name_prefix docs: Update description of karpenter node_iam_role_use_name_prefix Feb 18, 2025
It currently implies in the variable description that it will use the controller IAM role name (`iam_role_name`), but the code actually uses the `node_iam_role_name` for the prefix, if enabled.
@bryantbiggs bryantbiggs merged commit 1bfc10a into terraform-aws-modules:master Feb 19, 2025
22 checks passed
Argote-Gustavo-bah pushed a commit to navwar-seastar/terraform-aws-eks that referenced this pull request Feb 25, 2025
sarasensible pushed a commit to SensibleWeather/terraform-aws-eks that referenced this pull request Feb 26, 2025
@antonbabenko
Copy link
Member

This PR is included in version 20.34.0 🎉

Copy link

github-actions bot commented Apr 7, 2025

I'm going to lock this pull request because it has been closed for 30 days ⏳. This helps our maintainers find and focus on the active issues. If you have found a problem that seems related to this change, please open a new issue and complete the issue template so we can capture all the details necessary to investigate further.

@github-actions github-actions bot locked as resolved and limited conversation to collaborators Apr 7, 2025
Sign up for free to subscribe to this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in.
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants