generated from terraform-ibm-modules/terraform-ibm-module-template
-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 1
fix: update DA inputs #549
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Merged
Changes from 3 commits
Commits
Show all changes
7 commits
Select commit
Hold shift + click to select a range
0922d45
fix: update DA inputs
shemau 2438857
Merge branch 'main' into da-inputs
shemau daec1ad
fix: merge with new validations
shemau bf2970e
fix: review feedback
shemau b72e768
Merge branch 'main' into da-inputs
ocofaigh bd8c641
Merge branch 'main' into da-inputs
shemau c461874
fix: test update
shemau File filter
Filter by extension
Conversations
Failed to load comments.
Loading
Jump to
Jump to file
Failed to load files.
Loading
Diff view
Diff view
There are no files selected for viewing
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
These validations should be part of the
variables.tf. See example: https://github.com/terraform-ibm-modules/terraform-ibm-secrets-manager/blob/main/variables.tf#L69There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
yes good point since module and examples now require tf >=1.9.0 we should use cross variable validation here
Uh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I will push a change.
The existing validation in main at L320 is already present (duplicated) in variables at L344
The existing validation in main at L322 is already present (duplicated) in variables at L364
The existing validation in main at L324 is already present (duplicated) in variables at L383
It appears the new validation was added as part of the 1.9 upgrade, but this occurrence, which was not at the top of the file was overlooked during a merge conflict resolution and got restored by mistake. Good catch.