Skip to content

Conversation

@Aayush-Abhyarthi
Copy link
Member

Description

https://github.ibm.com/GoldenEye/issues/issues/12402

Release required?

  • No release
  • Patch release (x.x.X)
  • Minor release (x.X.x)
  • Major release (X.x.x)
Release notes content

Upgrade to terraform 1.9.0.
Update to used cross object referencing.

Run the pipeline

If the CI pipeline doesn't run when you create the PR, the PR requires a user with GitHub collaborators access to run the pipeline.

Run the CI pipeline when the PR is ready for review and you expect tests to pass. Add a comment to the PR with the following text:

/run pipeline

Checklist for reviewers

  • If relevant, a test for the change is included or updated with this PR.
  • If relevant, documentation for the change is included or updated with this PR.

For mergers

  • Use a conventional commit message to set the release level. Follow the guidelines.
  • Include information that users need to know about the PR in the commit message. The commit message becomes part of the GitHub release notes.
  • Use the Squash and merge option.

@Aayush-Abhyarthi
Copy link
Member Author

/run pipeline

@Ak-sky
Copy link
Member

Ak-sky commented May 6, 2025

@Aayush-Abhyarthi, is this covering all the scenarios like this one here- terraform-ibm-modules/terraform-ibm-icd-redis#563 (comment)?

@Aayush-Abhyarthi
Copy link
Member Author

@Aayush-Abhyarthi, is this covering all the scenarios like this one here- terraform-ibm-modules/terraform-ibm-icd-redis#563 (comment)?

@Ak-sky Yes Akash.

@Aayush-Abhyarthi
Copy link
Member Author

/run pipeline

Copy link
Contributor

@mukulpalit-ibm mukulpalit-ibm left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Validation missing in root module

var.use_same_kms_key_for_backups
)
error_message = "When 'use_same_kms_key_for_backups' is set to false, a value needs to be passed for 'backup_encryption_key_crn'."
}
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

validation missing for validate_pitr_vars

Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

good catch... I added a tested commit for this.

I opted for more specific (more verbose) validation. This keeps the validation conditional logic simpler and more readable. Feel free to change it if you want.

@shemau
Copy link
Contributor

shemau commented May 13, 2025

/run pipeline

Copy link
Contributor

@mukulpalit-ibm mukulpalit-ibm left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

LGTM

@Aayush-Abhyarthi
Copy link
Member Author

/run pipeline

@ocofaigh
Copy link
Contributor

/run pipeline

@ocofaigh ocofaigh merged commit a2217e3 into main May 16, 2025
2 checks passed
@ocofaigh ocofaigh deleted the cross-obj branch May 16, 2025 15:54
@terraform-ibm-modules-ops
Copy link
Contributor

🎉 This PR is included in version 3.22.19 🎉

The release is available on:

Your semantic-release bot 📦🚀

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

7 participants