Skip to content

Conversation

MichaelDeBoey
Copy link
Member

Follow-up of #382

@MichaelDeBoey MichaelDeBoey requested a review from G-Rath November 20, 2024 16:21
@MichaelDeBoey MichaelDeBoey self-assigned this Nov 20, 2024
@G-Rath
Copy link
Collaborator

G-Rath commented Nov 20, 2024

I don't really see this as strictly better - the types as they are pretty straightforward and maintainable as they are imo, and I in particular like having the configs written out individually to make it clear what is available without having to mentally unroll some type logic.

At the very least, this is not a "feat" or a "fix"

@G-Rath
Copy link
Collaborator

G-Rath commented Feb 26, 2025

I'm going to close this due to age, and since it's not clear that this is actually an improvement

@G-Rath G-Rath closed this Feb 26, 2025
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants