Updated step groups doc

[bharathk08]

Summary by CodeRabbit

• Documentation
  • Reorganized step group documentation to consolidate cross-type reuse compatibility information and element locator considerations into an improved information block structure for clearer guidance.

_{✏️ Tip: You can customize this high-level summary in your review settings.}

[coderabbitai]

Walkthrough

Documentation update to step-group guidance: replaced a prerequisites paragraph with an "ADDITIONAL INFORMATION" info block containing a note about mismatched element locators, and removed the list of allowed cross-type step-group reuse paths.

Changes

Cohort / File(s)	Summary
Documentation restructure src/pages/docs/test-cases/step-types/step-group.md	Replaced prerequisites block with new "ADDITIONAL INFORMATION" info block; removed list of allowed cross-type step-group reuse paths (iOS↔Android, Web↔iOS, etc.)

Estimated code review effort

🎯 2 (Simple) | ⏱️ ~8 minutes

• Verify the removal of the allowed cross-type reuse paths list is intentional and complete
• Confirm the restructured info block accurately conveys the intended message about element locators

Possibly related PRs

• Updated Step Groups doc with Global Step Group Update #853: Also modifies the same step-group documentation file to alter reuse guidance content.
• Updated 'Use a Step Group Between Projects' doc #854: Also modifies the same file and addresses cross-application step-group reuse prerequisites and notes.

Suggested reviewers

• Nandhini4501

Poem

🐰 A doc-loving rabbit hops with glee,
Restructuring info for clarity,
"ADDITIONAL INFORMATION" shines so bright,
Old paths removed, new format takes flight! ✨

Pre-merge checks and finishing touches

❌ Failed checks (1 inconclusive)

Check name	Status	Explanation	Resolution
Title check	❓ Inconclusive	The title is generic and vague, using non-descriptive phrasing that doesn't convey specific information about what was updated in the step groups documentation.	Consider making the title more specific, such as 'Replace step-group prerequisites with additional information block' or 'Reorganize step-group documentation structure', to better communicate the actual changes made.

✅ Passed checks (2 passed)

Check name	Status	Explanation
Description Check	✅ Passed	Check skipped - CodeRabbit’s high-level summary is enabled.
Docstring Coverage	✅ Passed	No functions found in the changed files to evaluate docstring coverage. Skipping docstring coverage check.

✨ Finishing touches

🧪 Generate unit tests (beta)

• Create PR with unit tests
• Post copyable unit tests in a comment
• Commit unit tests in branch update/DOC-496

---

📜 Recent review details

Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI

Review profile: CHILL

Plan: Pro

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between 8fc48f8 and ef491b4.

📒 Files selected for processing (1)

• src/pages/docs/test-cases/step-types/step-group.md (1 hunks)

⏰ Context from checks skipped due to timeout of 90000ms. You can increase the timeout in your CodeRabbit configuration to a maximum of 15 minutes (900000ms). (1)

• GitHub Check: CI

🔇 Additional comments (1)

src/pages/docs/test-cases/step-types/step-group.md (1)

192-194: Verify <br> tag rendering in the info block.

The <br> tag on line 193 within the pipe-separated info block content uses unusual syntax. Confirm this renders correctly in your documentation platform. If the intent is visual spacing, consider whether platform-specific formatting (e.g., blank pipe lines) would be more reliable.

The warning message itself is clear and contextually appropriate for the cross-project reuse section.

---

Thanks for using CodeRabbit! It's free for OSS, and your support helps us grow. If you like it, consider giving us a shout-out.

❤️ Share

• X
• Mastodon
• Reddit
• LinkedIn

_{Comment @coderabbitai help to get the list of available commands and usage tips.}