Skip to content

Version bump#391

Merged
Jacob-Chmura merged 1 commit intomainfrom
dep/bump
Jan 24, 2026
Merged

Version bump#391
Jacob-Chmura merged 1 commit intomainfrom
dep/bump

Conversation

@Jacob-Chmura
Copy link
Member

No description provided.

@Jacob-Chmura Jacob-Chmura self-assigned this Jan 21, 2026
@codecov
Copy link

codecov bot commented Jan 21, 2026

Codecov Report

✅ All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests.

📢 Thoughts on this report? Let us know!

@Jacob-Chmura Jacob-Chmura marked this pull request as ready for review January 21, 2026 17:24
Copy link
Collaborator

@shenyangHuang shenyangHuang left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

check if we go with 0.2.0 @Jacob-Chmura
Also, do we mention the version number anywhere in README or online docs?

[project]
name = "tgm-lib"
version = "0.1.0b0"
version = "0.1.0b1"
Copy link
Collaborator

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I am not sure about naming conventions but shouldn't we just do 0.2.0 ?

@Jacob-Chmura
Copy link
Member Author

check if we go with 0.2.0

Technically I am not following SemVar since I would not consider any of our releases stable at this stage. Hence, I'm incrementing the version counter on our beta flag.

Once we release 0.2.0 for instance, any breaking change would force us to release 1.x.x which is not what I want until after beta 3.

do we mention the version number anywhere in README or online docs?

No, any other occurences are pulled in from our pip release (not hard coded).

@Jacob-Chmura Jacob-Chmura merged commit 7691642 into main Jan 24, 2026
7 checks passed
@Jacob-Chmura Jacob-Chmura deleted the dep/bump branch January 24, 2026 13:37
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants