Skip to content

Conversation

@AkshayGadhaveRH
Copy link
Contributor

Puppet agent 8 is provided via the client-2 repository as, the client repo is release neutral and cannot contain both Puppet agents 7 and 8.

Adding information about the client-2 repository where necessary.

JIRA:
https://issues.redhat.com/browse/SAT-28268
https://issues.redhat.com/browse/SAT-27092
https://issues.redhat.com/browse/SAT-28287

What changes are you introducing?

Why are you introducing these changes? (Explanation, links to references, issues, etc.)

Anything else to add? (Considerations, potential downsides, alternative solutions you have explored, etc.)

Checklists

  • I am okay with my commits getting squashed when you merge this PR.
  • I am familiar with the contributing guidelines.

Please cherry-pick my commits into:

  • Foreman 3.15/Katello 4.17
  • Foreman 3.14/Katello 4.16 (Satellite 6.17)
  • Foreman 3.13/Katello 4.15 (EL9 only)
  • Foreman 3.12/Katello 4.14 (Satellite 6.16; orcharhino 7.2 on EL9 only)
  • Foreman 3.11/Katello 4.13 (orcharhino 6.11 on EL8 only; orcharhino 7.0 on EL8+EL9; orcharhino 7.1 with Leapp)
  • Foreman 3.10/Katello 4.12
  • Foreman 3.9/Katello 4.11 (Satellite 6.15; orcharhino 6.8/6.9/6.10)
  • Foreman 3.8/Katello 4.10
  • Foreman 3.7/Katello 4.9 (Satellite 6.14)
  • We do not accept PRs for Foreman older than 3.7.

Puppet agent 8 is provided via the client-2 repository as, the client repo is release neutral and cannot contain both Puppet agents 7 and 8.

Adding information about the client-2 repository where necessary.

JIRA:
https://issues.redhat.com/browse/SAT-28268
https://issues.redhat.com/browse/SAT-27092
https://issues.redhat.com/browse/SAT-28287
@AkshayGadhaveRH AkshayGadhaveRH added Needs tech review Requires a review from the technical perspective Needs style review Requires a review from docs style/grammar perspective Not yet reviewed labels May 26, 2025
@AkshayGadhaveRH AkshayGadhaveRH marked this pull request as draft May 26, 2025 12:14
@AkshayGadhaveRH AkshayGadhaveRH removed Needs tech review Requires a review from the technical perspective Needs style review Requires a review from docs style/grammar perspective Not yet reviewed labels May 26, 2025
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant