Skip to content

Conversation

@jafiala
Copy link
Contributor

@jafiala jafiala commented Jan 27, 2026

What changes are you introducing?

Add more specific necessary and optional permissions.

Why are you introducing these changes? (Explanation, links to references, issues, etc.)

https://issues.redhat.com/browse/SAT-41542

Anything else to add? (Considerations, potential downsides, alternative solutions you have explored, etc.)

Contributor checklists

  • I am okay with my commits getting squashed when you merge this PR.
  • I am familiar with the contributing guidelines.

Please cherry-pick my commits into:

  • Foreman 3.17/Katello 4.19
  • Foreman 3.16/Katello 4.18 (Satellite 6.18; orcharhino 7.6)
  • Foreman 3.15/Katello 4.17
  • Foreman 3.14/Katello 4.16 (Satellite 6.17; orcharhino 7.4; orcharhino 7.5)
  • Foreman 3.13/Katello 4.15 (EL9 only)
  • Foreman 3.12/Katello 4.14 (Satellite 6.16; orcharhino 7.2 on EL9 only; orcharhino 7.3)
  • We do not accept PRs for Foreman older than 3.12.

@github-actions github-actions bot added Needs tech review Requires a review from the technical perspective Needs style review Requires a review from docs style/grammar perspective Needs testing Requires functional testing labels Jan 27, 2026
@Lennonka Lennonka added the Waiting on contributor Requires an action from the author label Jan 27, 2026
@maximiliankolb maximiliankolb changed the title Add additional permissions Add additional permissions for KubeVirt Jan 28, 2026
Co-authored-by: Maximilian Kolb <[email protected]>
@pr-processor pr-processor bot added Needs re-review and removed Waiting on contributor Requires an action from the author labels Jan 28, 2026
Co-authored-by: Aneta Šteflová Petrová <[email protected]>
Co-authored-by: Evgeni Golov <[email protected]>
@maximiliankolb maximiliankolb added tech review done No issues from the technical perspective and removed Needs tech review Requires a review from the technical perspective labels Jan 29, 2026
Copy link
Contributor

@Lennonka Lennonka left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

A couple of cosmetic suggestions. Otherwise LGTM

@Lennonka Lennonka added style review done No issues from docs style/grammar perspective and removed Needs style review Requires a review from docs style/grammar perspective labels Jan 29, 2026
@Lennonka
Copy link
Contributor

If it doesn't need testing, please remove the label. Then I can merge.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

Needs testing Requires functional testing style review done No issues from docs style/grammar perspective tech review done No issues from the technical perspective

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

5 participants