-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 105
fix: improve return data formatting in readContract #909
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Merged
Merged
Changes from all commits
Commits
File filter
Filter by extension
Conversations
Failed to load comments.
Loading
Jump to
Jump to file
Failed to load files.
Loading
Diff view
Diff view
There are no files selected for viewing
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Oops, something went wrong.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
💡 Verification agent
🧩 Analysis chain
Verify the necessity of the serialize-deserialize pattern.
The code now performs
JSON.parse(stringify(returnData))which seems redundant since the data is immediately stringified and then parsed back. This pattern, combined with the existingbigNumberReplaceron line 99, raises several concerns:bigNumberReplacerandstringify/parsemay be handling similar data transformationsConsider if this pattern is truly necessary or if one of these approaches would be better:
bigNumberReplacerif it handles all required transformationsstringifyif it's more comprehensive thanbigNumberReplacerLet me verify what the
stringifyfunction does and if this pattern is commonly used:🏁 Script executed:
Length of output: 9739
Review JSON serialization in
read.tsIt looks like we first run
returnData = bigNumberReplacer(returnData)and then immediately do– a pattern also used in
get-receipt.tsandadmin/transaction.tsto deep-clone and sanitize outputs. Sincestringifyfromthirdweb/utilsalready applies its own BigNumber/BigInt replacer, this double handling may be redundant and adds extra CPU cost.Please consider one of the following:
bigNumberReplacercall and rely solely onstringify’s built-in replacer.JSON.parse(stringify(...))step and sendreturnDatadirectly after runningbigNumberReplacer.Location to update:
• src/server/routes/contract/read/read.ts, line 103 (
result: JSON.parse(stringify(returnData)) as any)🤖 Prompt for AI Agents