-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 135
Provide rbind() and cbind() methods #909
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Draft
krlmlr
wants to merge
15
commits into
main
Choose a base branch
from
f-34-rbind
base: main
Could not load branches
Branch not found: {{ refName }}
Loading
Could not load tags
Nothing to show
Loading
Are you sure you want to change the base?
Some commits from the old base branch may be removed from the timeline,
and old review comments may become outdated.
+1,941
−2,040
Draft
Changes from 4 commits
Commits
Show all changes
15 commits
Select commit
Hold shift + click to select a range
88254bb
Provide rbind() and cbind() methods
krlmlr e7f6c5a
Merge branch 'master' into f-34-rbind
krlmlr bbf938d
Merge branch 'master' into f-34-rbind
krlmlr 6b882db
Simplify
krlmlr 1b55f15
Merge branch 'master' into f-34-rbind
krlmlr 357ea7b
Splice all arguments into the ellipsis in vec_rbind() and vec_cbind()
krlmlr 513ae36
Run revdeps
hadley e2a93e2
Add fallback
krlmlr 4326dbd
Re-run failed revdeps
hadley 03245c4
Install curl
krlmlr 02e3ef6
Merge branch 'master' into f-34-rbind
krlmlr 0586dac
Merge branch 'master' into f-34-rbind
krlmlr 11db9ab
Add rbind_trace and cbind_trace options
krlmlr 991c7b2
Opt-out and preview helpers
krlmlr 16bc882
Merge branch 'master' into f-34-rbind
krlmlr File filter
Filter by extension
Conversations
Failed to load comments.
Loading
Jump to
Jump to file
Failed to load files.
Loading
Diff view
Diff view
There are no files selected for viewing
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Uh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I feel like it is reasonable that if users want to use the optional arguments in
vec_c/rbind(), then they should just usevec_c/rbind()instead, but I wanted to check here if that is also what you are thinking.There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Good catch! Should we do
vec_cbind(!!!list(...))instead, to avoid passing through optional arguments?There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I think that would work yes. Or should that be
list2()? Or would it be weird to use!!!with base generics? I don't really know what to think about these mixed interfaces.