Skip to content
Open
Changes from 2 commits
Commits
File filter

Filter by extension

Filter by extension

Conversations
Failed to load comments.
Loading
Jump to
Jump to file
Failed to load files.
Loading
Diff view
Diff view
37 changes: 35 additions & 2 deletions pptx_blueprint/__init__.py
Original file line number Diff line number Diff line change
Expand Up @@ -33,14 +33,47 @@ def replace_text(self, label: str, new_text: str) -> None:
for shape in shapes:
shape.text = new_text

def replace_picture(self, label: str, filename: _Pathlike) -> None:
def replace_picture(self, label: str, filename: _Pathlike, *, do_not_scale_up: bool = False) -> None:
Copy link
Owner

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

What is the motivation / usecase szenario for do_not_scale_up?

I would want the following behaviors in the future (might be in a future PR).

scale:
    All image scaling preseves the aspect-ratio of the original image.
    - 'fit-width': Scale the image to the width of the placeholder.
    - 'fit-height': Scale the image to the height of the placeholder.
    - 'fit': Scale the image to fit inside the placeholder.

Note, that do_not_scale_up and scale are sort of orthogonal.

Naming: One might want to use scale_policy instead of do_not_scale_up; with values "shrink-only", "enlarge-only", None.

scale_policy

Copy link
Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

With my implementation the image does always fit into the size of the replaced shape. By calculating the aspect ratio I am able to defect if height or width is the limiting dimension. This is the same as scale='fit'.
I don't like the idea of adding the options 'fit-width' and 'fit-height'. Allowing the image to get larger than the placeholder will result in overlapping with other shapes.
The scale_up=False is useful if an image is only a little to small. Scaling it up by a view percent will reduce the image quality. By preventing up scaling we will get the best image quality.

Copy link
Owner

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I don't like the idea of adding the options 'fit-width' and 'fit-height'. Allowing the image to get larger than the placeholder will result in overlapping with other shapes.

Not saying that they should be default. But we shouldn't assume too much on the user's intention. I can imagine situations in which you'd really want to force the width/height - no matter the cost.

I agree that preventing upscaling might be desirable. Similarly, somebody might want to prevent downscaling since it reduces the information in the image.

"""Replaces rectangle placeholders on one or many slides.
Copy link

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Minor rewording please: ... on one or many slides with an image.


Args:
label (str): label of the placeholder (without curly braces)
filename (path-like): path to an image file
do_not_scale_up (bool): deactivates that the image is enlarged (default: False)
"""
pass
shapes_to_replace = self._find_shapes(label)
if not shapes_to_replace:
raise ValueError(f"The label '{label}' can't be found in the template.")
if isinstance(filename, str):
filename = pathlib.Path(filename)
if not filename.is_file():
raise FileNotFoundError(f"The file does not exist: {filename}")
with open(filename, "rb") as img_file:
old_shape: BaseShape
for old_shape in shapes_to_replace:
slide_shapes = old_shape._parent
img_shape = slide_shapes.add_picture(
image_file=img_file,
left=old_shape.left,
top=old_shape.top,
)
# Scaling the image if `do_not_scale == False`:
if img_shape.height <= old_shape.height and img_shape.width <= old_shape.width and not do_not_scale_up:
old_aspect_ratio = old_shape.width / old_shape.height
new_aspect_ratio = img_shape.width / img_shape.height
if old_aspect_ratio >= new_aspect_ratio:
Copy link

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Using an image in portrait mode, the width of the image is set to the width of old_shape, which results in an overflow in y direction. This logic seems broken?

Copy link

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Vice versa, an image in landscape mode overflows in x direction. Replacing >= with < hence fixes this issue.

img_shape.width = old_shape.width
img_shape.height = int(img_shape.width / new_aspect_ratio)
else:
img_shape.height = old_shape.height
img_shape.width = int(img_shape.height * new_aspect_ratio)
# Centering the image at the extent of the placeholder:
img_shape.top += int((old_shape.height - img_shape.height) / 2)
img_shape.left += int((old_shape.width - img_shape.width) / 2)
del slide_shapes[slide_shapes.index(old_shape)]
Copy link

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

For me running on Python 3.6.9 (installed via pyenv, test suite is OK), the deletion is not working:

Traceback (most recent call last):
  File "/home/carsten/.PyCharmCE2019.2/config/scratches/scratch.py", line 7, in <module>
    tpl.replace_picture('*:logo', '/home/carsten/Downloads/beer.jpg')
  File "/home/carsten/Documents/Python/pptx-blueprint/pptx_blueprint/__init__.py", line 75, in replace_picture
    del slide_shapes[slide_shapes.index(old_shape)]
TypeError: 'SlideShapes' object doesn't support item deletion

# Removing shapes is performed at the lxml level.
# The `element` attribute contains an instance of `lxml.etree._Element`.
slide_shapes.element.remove(old_shape.element)

def replace_table(self, label: str, data) -> None:
"""Replaces rectangle placeholders on one or many slides.
Expand Down