Model checking: deterministic config resolution and config-based outputs/traces#494
Closed
Model checking: deterministic config resolution and config-based outputs/traces#494
Conversation
Member
|
@younes-io, "restore" implies that there’s a commit that caused the issue. Could you please share the commit? Was it mine? :-) |
Collaborator
Author
|
You’re right, “restore” was a bad choice of wording.
the "restore" was within this PR, as part of a refactor. So no “regression commit” on |
Collaborator
Author
|
Superseded by #495 (same changes + DCO sign-offs). Closing this PR to avoid duplicate review. |
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
.tlaconfigs and normalize model/trace naming.cfgfiles, so custom runs could not select.tlaconfigscustomPickresolver mode for custom commands and strip.tlafrom model/trace namesnpm test