Skip to content

Conversation

tonyherre
Copy link
Owner

A potential followup to w3c#173, ensuring we only have a single field related to an encoded frame with the name "timestamp", and there's less incompatibility between our encoded frames and WebCodec's due to misaligned timestamp definitions.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant