Conversation
| const { data: copilotRequestData }: CopilotRequestResponse = useCopilotRequest(routeParams.requestId) | ||
|
|
||
| useEffect(() => { | ||
| if (copilotRequestData) { |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Ensure that copilotRequestData has the expected structure before setting it to formValues to prevent potential runtime errors.
| }, [copilotRequestData]) | ||
|
|
||
| const { data: projects = [] }: ProjectsResponse = useProjects(undefined, { | ||
| filter: { id: copilotRequestData?.projectId }, |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
The filter object is using optional chaining with copilotRequestData?.projectId. Ensure that the logic correctly handles cases where projectId is undefined.
|
|
||
| const { data: projects = [] }: ProjectsResponse = useProjects(undefined, { | ||
| filter: { id: copilotRequestData?.projectId }, | ||
| isPaused: () => !copilotRequestData?.projectId, |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
The isPaused function uses optional chaining with copilotRequestData?.projectId. Ensure that the logic correctly handles cases where projectId is undefined.
| Object.entries(formValues) | ||
| .filter(([, value]) => value !== ''), // Excludes null and undefined | ||
| // Excludes null and undefined | ||
| .filter(([field, value]) => editableFields.includes(field) && value !== ''), |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Consider checking if editableFields is defined and is an array before using includes to avoid potential runtime errors.
| .filter(([field, value]) => editableFields.includes(field) && value !== ''), | ||
| ) | ||
| saveCopilotRequest(cleanedFormValues) | ||
| saveCopilotRequest({ ...cleanedFormValues, id: copilotRequestData?.id }) |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Ensure that copilotRequestData?.id is defined and valid before spreading it into cleanedFormValues to prevent unintended behavior.
| {' '} | ||
| { | ||
| copilotRequestData?.id | ||
| ? 'Use this form to update the copilot request for your project.' |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Consider simplifying the conditional rendering logic for the message. The current ternary operator with nested strings can be hard to read. You might want to extract the message into a separate variable for clarity.
| label='Title' | ||
| name='opportunityTitle' | ||
| placeholder='Enter a title for the opportunity' | ||
| value={formValues.opportunityTitle?.toString()} |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Ensure that formValues.opportunityTitle is properly initialized to avoid potential undefined errors when calling toString().
| name='opportunityTitle' | ||
| placeholder='Enter a title for the opportunity' | ||
| value={formValues.opportunityTitle?.toString()} | ||
| onChange={bind(handleFormValueChange, this, 'opportunityTitle')} |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Consider using a more descriptive function name instead of handleFormValueChange to clearly indicate its purpose or the specific form field it handles.
| dirty | ||
| isClearable | ||
| error={formErrors.projectId} | ||
| options={projectOptions} |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Ensure that projectOptions is properly defined and populated with the expected data structure before being passed to the Select component. This will prevent potential runtime errors if projectOptions is undefined or incorrectly formatted.
| const confirmModal = useConfirmationModal() | ||
| const navigate = useNavigate() | ||
|
|
||
| const editRequest = useCallback(() => { |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
The editRequest function is defined but not used within the component. Consider removing it if it's not needed or ensure it is invoked appropriately.
| <> | ||
| <Button primary onClick={confirmApprove} label='Approve Request' /> | ||
| <Button primary variant='danger' onClick={confirmReject} label='Reject Request' /> | ||
| <Button primary onClick={editRequest} label='Edit Request' className={styles.mrAuto} /> |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
The className prop is added to the Edit Request button. Ensure that styles.mrAuto is defined in the styles and is necessary for the layout. If not, consider removing it to keep the code clean.
| navigate(copilotRoutesMap.CopilotRequestDetails.replace(':requestId', `${props.request.id}`)) | ||
| }, [navigate, props.request.id]) | ||
|
|
||
| const editRequest = useCallback(() => { |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Consider adding error handling in the editRequest function to manage potential navigation failures. This will improve the robustness of the function.
| <IconSolid.EyeIcon className='icon-lg' /> | ||
| </Tooltip> | ||
| </div> | ||
| <div className={styles.viewRequestIcon} onClick={editRequest}> |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
The editRequest function is used here, but it's not clear from the diff if this function is defined or imported correctly. Please ensure that editRequest is defined and handles the edit action appropriately.
| createdAt: new Date(data.createdAt), | ||
| data: undefined, | ||
| opportunity: data.copilotOpportunity?.[0], | ||
| startDate: new Date(data.data?.startDate), |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Ensure that data.data?.startDate is a valid date string before passing it to the Date constructor to avoid potential Invalid Date issues. Consider adding a check or using a date parsing library for better validation.
| */ | ||
| export const useCopilotRequest = (requestId: string): CopilotRequestResponse => { | ||
| const url = buildUrl(`${baseUrl}/copilots/requests/${requestId}`) | ||
| export const useCopilotRequest = (requestId?: string): CopilotRequestResponse => { |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
The requestId parameter is now optional, but the url variable will be undefined if requestId is not provided. Ensure that the rest of the code handles this scenario appropriately to avoid potential runtime errors.
|
|
||
| const requestData = { | ||
| data: request, | ||
| data: { ...request, id: undefined }, |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
The id property is being set to undefined in the request data. Ensure this is intentional and does not affect the server-side processing of the request.
| } | ||
|
|
||
| return xhrPostAsync(url, requestData, {}) | ||
| return request.id ? xhrPatchAsync(url, requestData) : xhrPostAsync(url, requestData, {}) |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Consider handling potential errors from xhrPatchAsync and xhrPostAsync to ensure that any issues during the request are properly managed and communicated.
Related JIRA Ticket:
https://topcoder.atlassian.net/browse/PM-1499
What's in this PR?