Skip to content

Conversation

Copy link
Contributor

Copilot AI commented Oct 29, 2025

Issue #64 requested splitting the create command handler into focused subcommands. This work was already completed in PR #78.

Current State

The refactoring is complete with the following structure:

src/presentation/commands/create/
├── handler.rs (43 lines - routing only)
└── subcommands/
    ├── template.rs (72 lines)
    └── environment.rs (271 lines with 5 tests)

Handler now only dispatches:

pub fn handle_create_command(action: CreateAction, working_dir: &Path) 
    -> Result<(), CreateSubcommandError> 
{
    match action {
        CreateAction::Environment { env_file } => {
            subcommands::handle_environment_creation(&env_file, working_dir)
        }
        CreateAction::Template { output_path } => {
            let template_path = output_path.unwrap_or_else(CreateAction::default_template_path);
            subcommands::handle_template_generation(&template_path)
        }
    }
}

Verification

  • Handler reduced from 372 to 43 lines (88% reduction)
  • Each subcommand independently testable (5 tests in environment, 4 in template)
  • All 33 create command tests pass
  • No business logic in router layer
  • Follows project DDD patterns

This PR documents that all acceptance criteria from issue #64 are met.

Original prompt

This section details on the original issue you should resolve

<issue_title>Split Template Generation from Environment Creation</issue_title>
<issue_description>Parent Issue: #63
Type: 🎯 Quick Win
Impact: 🟢🟢🟢 High
Effort: 🔵🔵 Medium
Priority: P0
Depends On: #64 (Proposal 1)

Problem

The handle_create_command() function handles two completely different concerns in a single file, making it large (372 lines) and mixing different levels of abstraction:

pub fn handle_create_command(action: CreateAction, working_dir: &Path) {
    match action {
        CreateAction::Environment { env_file } => {
            // Complex domain operation (100+ lines)
            handle_environment_creation(&env_file, working_dir)
        }
        CreateAction::Template { output_path } => {
            // Simple file operation (30 lines)
            handle_template_generation(&template_path)
        }
    }
}

Proposed Solution

Separate the subcommand implementations into their own modules:

Structure:

create/
  ├── handler.rs                      // Simple router (delegates to subcommands)
  ├── subcommands/
  │   ├── mod.rs
  │   ├── template.rs                 // Template generation logic
  │   └── environment.rs              // Environment creation logic
  └── ...

Router in handler.rs:

use super::subcommands;

pub fn handle_create_command(action: CreateAction, working_dir: &Path) 
    -> Result<(), CreateSubcommandError> 
{
    match action {
        CreateAction::Environment { env_file } => {
            subcommands::environment::handle(&env_file, working_dir)
        }
        CreateAction::Template { output_path } => {
            let template_path = output_path.unwrap_or_else(CreateAction::default_template_path);
            subcommands::template::handle(&template_path)
        }
    }
}

Benefits

  • ✅ Router stays focused on dispatching (single responsibility)
  • ✅ Each subcommand has its own focused module
  • ✅ Easier to test each subcommand independently
  • ✅ Aligns with Proposal 1's subcommands folder structure
  • ✅ Reduces file size from 372 lines to manageable modules
  • ✅ Prepares for future refactoring of environment creation

Implementation Checklist

  • Create src/presentation/commands/create/subcommands/ directory
  • Create src/presentation/commands/create/subcommands/mod.rs
  • Extract template generation to subcommands/template.rs with handle() function
  • Extract environment creation to subcommands/environment.rs with handle() function
  • Extract display_success_message() helper to template subcommand
  • Add comprehensive documentation to each subcommand module
  • Update create/mod.rs to include subcommands module
  • Update handler.rs to import and delegate to subcommands
  • Update re-exports if needed
  • Move or duplicate relevant tests to subcommand modules
  • Verify all tests pass
  • Run linter and fix issues

Acceptance Criteria

  • Template generation is in subcommands/template.rs
  • Environment creation is in subcommands/environment.rs
  • Router in handler.rs only dispatches (no business logic)
  • Each subcommand is independently testable
  • All functionality is preserved
  • All tests pass: cargo test create::subcommands
  • Pre-commit checks pass: ./scripts/pre-commit.sh
  • Code follows project conventions

Related Documentation

Comments on the Issue (you are @copilot in this section)


✨ Let Copilot coding agent set things up for you — coding agent works faster and does higher quality work when set up for your repo.

Copilot AI changed the title [WIP] Split template generation from environment creation Verify issue #64: Template generation and environment creation already split into subcommands Oct 29, 2025
Copilot AI requested a review from josecelano October 29, 2025 10:03
@josecelano josecelano marked this pull request as ready for review October 29, 2025 10:08
Copy link
Member

@josecelano josecelano left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

ACK 21c3e3a

@josecelano josecelano merged commit 9748d33 into main Oct 29, 2025
17 checks passed
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

Split Template Generation from Environment Creation

2 participants