feat: add dataset api #622
Conversation
️✅ There are no secrets present in this pull request anymore.If these secrets were true positive and are still valid, we highly recommend you to revoke them. 🦉 GitGuardian detects secrets in your source code to help developers and security teams secure the modern development process. You are seeing this because you or someone else with access to this repository has authorized GitGuardian to scan your pull request. |
|
|
|
Note Other AI code review bot(s) detectedCodeRabbit has detected other AI code review bot(s) in this pull request and will avoid duplicating their findings in the review comments. This may lead to a less comprehensive review. WalkthroughAdds a dataset subsystem to the SDK (dataset models, managers, interfaces, response transformer), integrates dataset endpoints into TraceloopClient (new HTTP helpers and datasets property), provides sample/test scripts, end-to-end tests and recordings, and adjusts tracing initialization and OpenAI instrumentation usage. Changes
Sequence Diagram(s)sequenceDiagram
actor Dev
participant App as SampleApp
participant Client as TraceloopClient
participant Datasets as SDK:Datasets/Dataset
participant API as Traceloop API (/v2)
Dev->>App: run sample/test script
App->>Client: init()
App->>Datasets: create(name, description)
Datasets->>API: POST /v2/datasets
API-->>Datasets: 201 dataset
Datasets-->>App: Dataset instance
App->>Dataset: addColumn(...)
Dataset->>API: POST /v2/datasets/{slug}/columns
API-->>Dataset: 200 column
Dataset-->>App: column info
App->>Dataset: addRows([...])
Dataset->>API: POST /v2/datasets/{slug}/rows
API-->>Dataset: 201 rows
Dataset-->>App: rows
App->>Dataset: publish(options)
Dataset->>API: POST /v2/datasets/{slug}/publish
API-->>Dataset: 200 version
Dataset-->>App: published status
sequenceDiagram
participant SDK as BaseDataset
participant API as Traceloop API
participant Util as ResponseTransformer
SDK->>API: HTTP request (get/post/put/delete)
API-->>SDK: Response (status, headers, body)
SDK->>SDK: handleResponse(response)
alt status OK and JSON
SDK->>Util: transformApiResponse(body)
Util-->>SDK: camelCased data
SDK-->>Caller: parsed data
else non-OK
SDK-->>Caller: throw Error("HTTP {status}: ..." + parsed message/text)
end
Estimated code review effort🎯 4 (Complex) | ⏱️ ~45 minutes Possibly related PRs
Suggested reviewers
Poem
✨ Finishing Touches
🧪 Generate unit tests
🪧 TipsChatThere are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:
SupportNeed help? Create a ticket on our support page for assistance with any issues or questions. CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR/Issue comments)Type Other keywords and placeholders
CodeRabbit Configuration File (
|
![ellipsis-dev[bot]](https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/in/64358?s=60&v=4){kind=small}
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Caution
Changes requested ❌
Reviewed everything up to bb5536a in 2 minutes and 41 seconds. Click for details.
- Reviewed
2770lines of code in19files - Skipped
0files when reviewing. - Skipped posting
4draft comments. View those below. - Modify your settings and rules to customize what types of comments Ellipsis leaves. And don't forget to react with 👍 or 👎 to teach Ellipsis.
1. packages/sample-app/src/sample_dataset.ts:8
- Draft comment:
Consider validating that TRACELOOP_API_KEY is defined to avoid silent failures at runtime. - Reason this comment was not posted:
Decided after close inspection that this draft comment was likely wrong and/or not actionable: usefulness confidence = 20% vs. threshold = 50% 1. The code already has error handling through getClient() check and try/catch blocks. 2. The SDK likely handles invalid API keys gracefully. 3. Environment variables are commonly used without explicit validation. 4. Adding validation wouldn't significantly improve the error handling that's already in place. 5. The comment is suggesting a defensive programming practice that isn't strictly necessary. The code could fail in a slightly more user-friendly way with explicit validation. The SDK's error handling behavior isn't completely clear from the code shown. The existing error handling with getClient() check and try/catch blocks already provides sufficient protection against API key issues. Adding another validation layer would be redundant. The comment should be deleted as the code already has adequate error handling through multiple mechanisms, and additional validation would be redundant.
2. packages/traceloop-sdk/src/lib/client/traceloop-client.ts:48
- Draft comment:
Endpoint version mismatch: buildDatasetPath rewrites '/v2/datasets' to '/v2/projects/{projectId}/datasets', yet tests expect '/v1/datasets'. Ensure consistency with API version and update tests/documentation accordingly. - Reason this comment was not posted:
Decided after close inspection that this draft comment was likely wrong and/or not actionable: usefulness confidence = 10% vs. threshold = 50% The code clearly handles v2 paths specifically and intentionally, as shown by the comment on line 49. There's no evidence of any v1 path issues - the function explicitly only modifies v2 paths and leaves all other paths unchanged. The comment speculates about test expectations without showing actual test code or failures. I could be wrong about the test expectations - there might be actual test files showing v1 usage that I can't see. The version mismatch could be a real issue in the broader codebase. While there could be test issues, we don't have evidence of them. The code change itself is clear and intentional about handling v2 paths specifically. Without seeing failing tests or other evidence, this comment is speculative. Delete this comment as it makes speculative assumptions about test expectations without evidence, and the code change itself is clear about its v2 path handling intention.
3. packages/traceloop-sdk/test/datasets.test.ts:78
- Draft comment:
Test expectation mismatch: The test expects URL 'https://api.traceloop.com/v1/datasets', but client now uses '/v2/projects/default/datasets'. Update test expectations to match the current API endpoint. - Reason this comment was not posted:
Decided after close inspection that this draft comment was likely wrong and/or not actionable: usefulness confidence = 20% vs. threshold = 50% This is a new test file being added, so the test author deliberately wrote it to expect v1. The comment assumes the test is wrong and v2 is correct, but provides no evidence for this. The client is initialized with just the base URL, with no version specified. Without seeing the client implementation or API docs, we can't know if v1 or v2 is correct. The comment could be correct - maybe the API really did change to v2. But we need more context about the API versioning to be sure. Given that this is a new test file being added, and the author explicitly wrote it for v1, we should assume they know which version they're testing against. Without strong evidence that v2 is correct, we should trust the test author. Delete the comment. While it could be correct about v2, we don't have enough evidence to override the test author's explicit choice of v1 in this new test file.
4. packages/traceloop-sdk/recordings/Test-Dataset-API-Recording_2413299938/Dataset-Creation-and-Management_3667698088/should-list-datasets_1091121199/recording.har:43
- Draft comment:
Typographical suggestion: In the JSON string under the 'text' property, several slug values use 'daatset' (e.g., "daatset-11", "daatset-10", etc.). This appears to be a typo, and it might be intended to be 'dataset'. Please verify if these should be corrected. - Reason this comment was not posted:
Comment was on unchanged code.
Workflow ID: wflow_ApGRFbgPPJgZrcRO
You can customize 
| return rows; | ||
| } | ||
|
|
||
| private parseCSVLine(line: string, delimiter: string): string[] { |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
CSV parsing logic is simplistic and may not correctly handle edge cases (e.g., embedded delimiters, escaped quotes, newlines). Consider using a robust CSV parsing library.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Caution
Changes requested ❌
Reviewed everything up to 6955d14 in 2 minutes and 15 seconds. Click for details.
- Reviewed
3095lines of code in20files - Skipped
0files when reviewing. - Skipped posting
5draft comments. View those below. - Modify your settings and rules to customize what types of comments Ellipsis leaves. And don't forget to react with 👍 or 👎 to teach Ellipsis.
1. packages/traceloop-sdk/src/lib/client/traceloop-client.ts:48
- Draft comment:
The buildDatasetPath method replaces '/v2/datasets' with '/v2/projects//datasets'. However, some tests (e.g. in datasets.test.ts) expect the v1 endpoint. Ensure endpoint versions are consistent across the code and tests. - Reason this comment was not posted:
Decided after close inspection that this draft comment was likely wrong and/or not actionable: usefulness confidence = 10% vs. threshold = 50% The comment is speculative - it mentions tests that may have issues but we can't see them. The code itself handles v2 paths explicitly and leaves other paths unchanged, which seems intentional. The comment asks to "ensure" consistency, which is a request for verification rather than pointing out a concrete issue. I might be missing actual test failures in datasets.test.ts that demonstrate this is a real problem. The version handling could be buggy in ways not visible in this file. Without seeing actual test failures or the test file contents, this remains speculative. The code's version handling appears intentional and clear. Delete this comment as it's speculative and asks for verification rather than pointing out a concrete issue. The code's version handling appears intentional.
2. packages/traceloop-sdk/test/datasets.test.ts:78
- Draft comment:
Test expects the URL 'https://api.traceloop.com/v1/datasets' but with the new dataset path logic, the URL will be transformed to v2 endpoints (e.g. '/v2/projects/default/datasets'). Update the test URL expectation to match the new endpoint. - Reason this comment was not posted:
Decided after close inspection that this draft comment was likely wrong and/or not actionable: usefulness confidence = 0% vs. threshold = 50% Looking at the test file, this is a new file being added, not a modification. The test is being written fresh with v1 endpoints. There's no evidence in the diff that shows v2 endpoints are being introduced or that there's any "new dataset path logic". The comment makes claims about changes that aren't visible in this PR. Maybe there are other files in the PR or codebase that show the v2 endpoint changes? Maybe this is part of a larger refactoring effort? Even if v2 endpoints are coming in the future, this comment is speculative - it's commenting on potential future changes rather than actual issues with the current code. The rules say not to make speculative comments. Delete the comment. It's speculative and refers to changes that aren't visible in this PR. If there is a plan to move to v2 endpoints, that should be handled in a separate PR.
3. packages/traceloop-sdk/src/lib/client/dataset/dataset.ts:138
- Draft comment:
Good use of batching in CSV import. This improves performance for large CSV files. - Reason this comment was not posted:
Confidence changes required:0%<= threshold50%None
4. packages/traceloop-sdk/recordings/Test-Dataset-API-Recording_2413299938/Dataset-Creation-and-Management_3667698088/should-list-datasets_1091121199/recording.har:43
- Draft comment:
I noticed several instances of "daatset" (e.g. "daatset-11", "daatset-10", etc.) in the dataset slugs within the JSON text. Is this a typographical error? Possibly it should be "dataset"? - Reason this comment was not posted:
Comment was on unchanged code.
5. packages/traceloop-sdk/src/lib/interfaces/dataset.interface.ts:97
- Draft comment:
There is no newline at the end of the file. Consider adding a trailing newline for consistency. - Reason this comment was not posted:
Decided after close inspection that this draft comment was likely wrong and/or not actionable: usefulness confidence = 10% vs. threshold = 50% While having a newline at end of file is a common convention, this is a very minor issue that would typically be handled automatically by linters or IDE settings. It doesn't affect functionality and is not related to any logic changes. Most modern development environments handle this automatically. The missing newline could cause issues with some Unix tools and version control systems. It's a widely accepted convention in software development. While true, this is exactly the kind of minor issue that should be handled by automated tooling rather than manual code review comments. It's too trivial for a human review comment. Delete this comment as it's too minor and would be better handled by automated tooling like linters or editor settings.
Workflow ID: wflow_TyQhpFoav052cKes
You can customize
| return versionsData.versions.find(v => v.version === version) || null; | ||
| } | ||
|
|
||
| private parseCSV(csvContent: string, delimiter: string, hasHeader: boolean): RowData[] { |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
The custom CSV parsing implementation may not handle all edge cases (e.g. fields with embedded newlines or escaped quotes). Consider using a robust CSV parsing library for production use.
![coderabbitai[bot]](https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/in/347564?s=60&v=4){kind=small}
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 12
♻️ Duplicate comments (1)
packages/traceloop-sdk/src/lib/client/dataset/dataset.ts (1)
197-217: CSV parsing logic needs improvementThe current CSV parsing implementation doesn't handle all edge cases correctly (e.g., escaped quotes within quoted fields, newlines within quotes).
Consider using a robust CSV parsing library like
csv-parseorpapaparse:+import { parse } from 'csv-parse/sync'; private parseCSV(csvContent: string, delimiter: string, hasHeader: boolean): RowData[] { - // Current manual parsing logic + const records = parse(csvContent, { + delimiter, + columns: hasHeader ? true : false, + skip_empty_lines: true, + trim: true, + cast: true, + cast_date: false + }); + + if (!hasHeader && records.length > 0) { + // Generate column names for headerless CSV + const firstRow = records[0]; + const headers = Object.keys(firstRow).map((_, i) => `column_${i + 1}`); + return records.map(row => { + const newRow: RowData = {}; + Object.values(row).forEach((value, i) => { + newRow[headers[i]] = value; + }); + return newRow; + }); + } + + return records; }
🧹 Nitpick comments (3)
packages/traceloop-sdk/src/lib/client/dataset/base-dataset.ts (1)
28-44: Consider consolidating validation methods to reduce duplication.The three validation methods (
validateDatasetId,validateDatasetSlug,validateDatasetName) have identical logic with only the error message differing.Consider refactoring to a generic validation method:
+ protected validateRequiredString(value: string, fieldName: string): void { + if (!value || typeof value !== 'string' || value.trim().length === 0) { + throw new Error(`${fieldName} is required and must be a non-empty string`); + } + } + - protected validateDatasetId(id: string): void { - if (!id || typeof id !== 'string' || id.trim().length === 0) { - throw new Error('Dataset ID is required and must be a non-empty string'); - } - } - - protected validateDatasetSlug(slug: string): void { - if (!slug || typeof slug !== 'string' || slug.trim().length === 0) { - throw new Error('Dataset slug is required and must be a non-empty string'); - } - } - - protected validateDatasetName(name: string): void { - if (!name || typeof name !== 'string' || name.trim().length === 0) { - throw new Error('Dataset name is required and must be a non-empty string'); - } - } + protected validateDatasetId(id: string): void { + this.validateRequiredString(id, 'Dataset ID'); + } + + protected validateDatasetSlug(slug: string): void { + this.validateRequiredString(slug, 'Dataset slug'); + } + + protected validateDatasetName(name: string): void { + this.validateRequiredString(name, 'Dataset name'); + }packages/sample-app/src/test_dataset_api.ts (1)
136-149: Consider using a more realistic CSV import example.The hardcoded CSV data is functional but could be more representative of real-world usage scenarios.
Consider using a more comprehensive CSV example:
const csvData = `user_id,score,active,department,join_date -user202,88,true -user303,91,false -user404,76,true`; +user202,88,true,engineering,2023-01-15 +user303,91,false,marketing,2022-11-22 +user404,76,true,sales,2023-03-08`;packages/sample-app/src/sample_dataset.ts (1)
293-296: Be cautious with stack trace loggingLogging full stack traces in production could potentially expose sensitive information about the application structure.
Consider conditionally logging stack traces based on environment:
} catch (error) { console.error("❌ Error in dataset operations:", error.message); - if (error.stack) { + if (error.stack && process.env.NODE_ENV === 'development') { console.error("Stack trace:", error.stack); } }
📜 Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
Plan: Pro
📒 Files selected for processing (20)
packages/sample-app/package.json(1 hunks)packages/sample-app/src/sample_dataset.ts(1 hunks)packages/sample-app/src/test_dataset_api.ts(1 hunks)packages/traceloop-sdk/recordings/Test-Dataset-API-Recording_2413299938/Column-Operations_3207658095/should-add-columns-to-dataset_1128156327/recording.har(1 hunks)packages/traceloop-sdk/recordings/Test-Dataset-API-Recording_2413299938/Dataset-Creation-and-Management_3667698088/should-create-a-new-dataset_1486295619/recording.har(1 hunks)packages/traceloop-sdk/recordings/Test-Dataset-API-Recording_2413299938/Dataset-Creation-and-Management_3667698088/should-get-dataset-by-slug_1748151842/recording.har(1 hunks)packages/traceloop-sdk/recordings/Test-Dataset-API-Recording_2413299938/Dataset-Creation-and-Management_3667698088/should-list-datasets_1091121199/recording.har(1 hunks)packages/traceloop-sdk/recordings/Test-Dataset-API-Recording_2413299938/Dataset-Creation-and-Management_3667698088/should-update-dataset_4001908675/recording.har(1 hunks)packages/traceloop-sdk/src/lib/client/dataset/base-dataset.ts(1 hunks)packages/traceloop-sdk/src/lib/client/dataset/column.ts(1 hunks)packages/traceloop-sdk/src/lib/client/dataset/dataset.ts(1 hunks)packages/traceloop-sdk/src/lib/client/dataset/datasets.ts(1 hunks)packages/traceloop-sdk/src/lib/client/dataset/index.ts(1 hunks)packages/traceloop-sdk/src/lib/client/dataset/row.ts(1 hunks)packages/traceloop-sdk/src/lib/client/traceloop-client.ts(4 hunks)packages/traceloop-sdk/src/lib/interfaces/dataset.interface.ts(1 hunks)packages/traceloop-sdk/src/lib/interfaces/index.ts(1 hunks)packages/traceloop-sdk/src/lib/node-server-sdk.ts(1 hunks)packages/traceloop-sdk/test/datasets-recording.test.ts(1 hunks)packages/traceloop-sdk/test/datasets.test.ts(1 hunks)
🧰 Additional context used
🧬 Code Graph Analysis (1)
packages/traceloop-sdk/src/lib/interfaces/index.ts (1)
packages/traceloop-sdk/src/lib/interfaces/traceloop-client.interface.ts (1)
TraceloopClientOptions(1-5)
🪛 GitHub Actions: CI
packages/traceloop-sdk/src/lib/client/dataset/datasets.ts
[error] 46-46: TypeError: Cannot read properties of null (reading 'datasets') in test 'should list datasets' (test/datasets.test.ts).
[error] 60-60: TypeError: Cannot read properties of null (reading 'datasets') in test 'should find dataset by name' (test/datasets.test.ts).
packages/traceloop-sdk/src/lib/client/dataset/column.ts
[error] 109-109: ESLint: Unexpected lexical declaration in case block (no-case-declarations)
[error] 121-121: ESLint: Unexpected lexical declaration in case block (no-case-declarations)
packages/traceloop-sdk/test/datasets.test.ts
[error] 78-78: AssertionError: Expected URL 'https://api.traceloop.com/v1/datasets' but got 'https://api.traceloop.com/v2/projects/default/datasets' in test 'should include correct headers and payload for dataset creation'.
packages/traceloop-sdk/test/datasets-recording.test.ts
[error] 1-1: PollyError: Recording for POST request to https://api-staging.traceloop.com/v2/projects/default/datasets not found and 'recordIfMissing' is false, causing test failure in 'should create a new dataset'.
[error] 87-87: TypeError: Cannot read properties of undefined (reading 'skip') in test 'should get dataset by slug'.
[error] 105-105: TypeError: Cannot read properties of undefined (reading 'skip') in test 'should update dataset'.
[error] 130-130: TypeError: Cannot read properties of undefined (reading 'skip') in test 'should add columns to dataset'.
[error] 159-159: TypeError: Cannot read properties of undefined (reading 'skip') in test 'should get columns from dataset'.
[error] 185-185: TypeError: Cannot read properties of undefined (reading 'skip') in test 'should add single row to dataset'.
[error] 201-201: TypeError: Cannot read properties of undefined (reading 'skip') in test 'should add multiple rows to dataset'.
[error] 219-219: TypeError: Cannot read properties of undefined (reading 'skip') in test 'should get rows from dataset'.
[error] 239-239: TypeError: Cannot read properties of undefined (reading 'skip') in test 'should import CSV data with headers'.
[error] 265-265: TypeError: Cannot read properties of undefined (reading 'skip') in test 'should publish dataset'.
[error] 280-280: TypeError: Cannot read properties of undefined (reading 'skip') in test 'should get dataset versions'.
[error] 291-291: TypeError: Cannot read properties of undefined (reading 'skip') in test 'should get dataset stats'.
[error] 304-304: TypeError: Cannot read properties of undefined (reading 'skip') in test 'should delete the test dataset'.
packages/traceloop-sdk/src/lib/client/dataset/row.ts
[error] 112-112: ESLint: Type string trivially inferred from a string literal, remove type annotation (@typescript-eslint/no-inferrable-types)
packages/traceloop-sdk/src/lib/client/dataset/dataset.ts
[error] 26-26: TypeError: Cannot read properties of null (reading 'id') in test 'should create a new dataset' (test/datasets.test.ts:49).
[error] 26-26: TypeError: Cannot read properties of null (reading 'id') in test 'should get a dataset by ID' (test/datasets.test.ts:119).
[error] 30-30: TypeError: Cannot read properties of null (reading 'slug') in test 'should update a dataset' (test/datasets.test.ts:206).
[error] 30-30: TypeError: Cannot read properties of null (reading 'slug') in test 'should delete a dataset' (test/datasets.test.ts:216).
[error] 30-30: TypeError: Cannot read properties of null (reading 'slug') in test 'should publish a dataset' (test/datasets.test.ts:234).
[error] 30-30: TypeError: Cannot read properties of null (reading 'slug') in test 'should add a column to dataset' (test/datasets.test.ts:271).
[error] 30-30: TypeError: Cannot read properties of null (reading 'slug') in test 'should get columns from dataset' (test/datasets.test.ts:308).
[error] 30-30: TypeError: Cannot read properties of null (reading 'slug') in test 'should add a row to dataset' (test/datasets.test.ts:344).
[error] 30-30: TypeError: Cannot read properties of null (reading 'slug') in test 'should add multiple rows to dataset' (test/datasets.test.ts:373).
[error] 30-30: TypeError: Cannot read properties of null (reading 'slug') in test 'should import CSV data' (test/datasets.test.ts:416).
[error] 30-30: TypeError: Cannot read properties of null (reading 'slug') in test 'should handle CSV without headers' (test/datasets.test.ts:433).
🪛 Biome (2.1.2)
packages/traceloop-sdk/src/lib/client/dataset/column.ts
[error] 109-109: Other switch clauses can erroneously access this declaration.
Wrap the declaration in a block to restrict its access to the switch clause.
The declaration is defined in this switch clause:
Safe fix: Wrap the declaration in a block.
(lint/correctness/noSwitchDeclarations)
[error] 121-121: Other switch clauses can erroneously access this declaration.
Wrap the declaration in a block to restrict its access to the switch clause.
The declaration is defined in this switch clause:
Safe fix: Wrap the declaration in a block.
(lint/correctness/noSwitchDeclarations)
🔇 Additional comments (18)
packages/traceloop-sdk/src/lib/interfaces/index.ts (1)
5-5: LGTM!The new export follows the existing pattern and properly exposes the dataset interfaces.
packages/sample-app/package.json (1)
31-32: LGTM!The new npm scripts follow the established pattern and provide convenient commands to run the dataset examples. The naming convention is consistent with existing scripts.
packages/traceloop-sdk/src/lib/client/dataset/index.ts (1)
1-5: LGTM!The barrel export pattern is implemented correctly, providing a clean entry point for dataset-related classes. The naming convention is consistent and follows TypeScript best practices.
packages/traceloop-sdk/recordings/Test-Dataset-API-Recording_2413299938/Column-Operations_3207658095/should-add-columns-to-dataset_1128156327/recording.har (1)
1-134: HAR recording structure is valid.The HTTP Archive file correctly captures the column addition API interaction. The request structure, headers, and response format appear appropriate for the dataset API. The use of Polly.JS for recording is a standard approach for HTTP interaction testing.
packages/traceloop-sdk/recordings/Test-Dataset-API-Recording_2413299938/Dataset-Creation-and-Management_3667698088/should-create-a-new-dataset_1486295619/recording.har (1)
1-130: HAR recording structure is valid.The HTTP Archive file correctly captures the dataset creation API interaction. The 201 Created status code is appropriate for resource creation, and the response includes comprehensive dataset metadata. The recording structure is suitable for test playback.
packages/traceloop-sdk/recordings/Test-Dataset-API-Recording_2413299938/Dataset-Creation-and-Management_3667698088/should-get-dataset-by-slug_1748151842/recording.har (1)
1-126: LGTM - Well-structured test recording for dataset retrieval by slug.This HAR recording properly captures the GET request for retrieving a dataset by slug, including the correct API endpoint structure (
/v2/projects/default/datasets/{slug}), SDK version header, and expected JSON response format with dataset metadata.packages/traceloop-sdk/src/lib/node-server-sdk.ts (2)
8-22: LGTM - Comprehensive dataset interface exports.The new dataset-related interface exports cover all necessary aspects of dataset management including CRUD operations, column/row management, CSV import, statistics, and versioning. The exports follow the established patterns and naming conventions.
25-25: LGTM - Proper dataset class exports.The export of the core dataset management classes (
Dataset,Datasets,Column,Row) provides a clean public API for dataset operations.packages/traceloop-sdk/recordings/Test-Dataset-API-Recording_2413299938/Dataset-Creation-and-Management_3667698088/should-list-datasets_1091121199/recording.har (1)
1-135: LGTM - Comprehensive test recording for dataset listing with pagination.This HAR recording properly captures the GET request for listing datasets with pagination parameters, demonstrating the API's ability to handle larger dataset collections (24 datasets in response). The response structure correctly shows the expected dataset metadata format.
packages/sample-app/src/test_dataset_api.ts (3)
3-21: LGTM - Proper SDK initialization and client setup.The initialization sequence correctly configures the Traceloop SDK with appropriate settings for testing, including proper async handling with
waitForInitialization()and client validation.
22-40: Good error isolation pattern for test execution.The nested try-catch blocks properly isolate failures per test step, allowing the test suite to continue even when individual tests fail. This provides comprehensive coverage of the API functionality.
247-251: LGTM - Proper error handling and process exit.The main function execution with error catching and process exit provides appropriate handling for test failures.
packages/traceloop-sdk/recordings/Test-Dataset-API-Recording_2413299938/Dataset-Creation-and-Management_3667698088/should-update-dataset_4001908675/recording.har (1)
60-60: Future dates in HAR recording fileThe HAR recording contains future dates (August 2025) which could cause issues with date-based logic or sorting. Consider using realistic dates or clearly marking this as test data.
Also applies to: 110-110, 175-175, 221-221
packages/traceloop-sdk/src/lib/client/dataset/column.ts (1)
53-53: Project-Scoped API Paths Are Handled by TraceloopClientI confirmed that all calls using
/v2/datasets/...are automatically rewritten to include the project scope:• In
packages/traceloop-sdk/src/lib/client/traceloop-client.tsthe client’s path normalization does:return path.replace( '/v2/datasets', `/v2/projects/${this.projectId}/datasets` );No changes are needed in the dataset client – the existing calls on lines 53, 67, and 73 will be properly scoped at runtime.
packages/traceloop-sdk/test/datasets.test.ts (1)
438-466: Excellent error handling test coverageGreat job on including comprehensive error handling tests for both HTTP errors and network errors. This ensures robust error handling in the SDK.
packages/traceloop-sdk/src/lib/client/traceloop-client.ts (1)
48-54: Potential issue with path replacement logicThe current implementation uses
path.replace()which will replace the first occurrence of '/v2/datasets' anywhere in the path. This could lead to incorrect replacements if the pattern appears elsewhere in the path.Consider using a more precise replacement:
buildDatasetPath(path: string): string { // Replace any path that starts with /v2/datasets with the correct project-based path if (path.startsWith('/v2/datasets')) { - return path.replace('/v2/datasets', `/v2/projects/${this.projectId}/datasets`); + return `/v2/projects/${this.projectId}/datasets${path.slice('/v2/datasets'.length)}`; } return path; }This ensures we only replace the prefix and not any occurrence within the path.
Likely an incorrect or invalid review comment.
packages/traceloop-sdk/src/lib/client/dataset/dataset.ts (1)
25-55: Null safety confirmed
The_dataproperty is declared as a non-nullableDatasetResponseand the constructor enforces this type. Our search shows no tests or code paths passingnullorundefinedintonew Dataset(...). No changes are required.packages/traceloop-sdk/src/lib/interfaces/dataset.interface.ts (1)
1-97: Well-structured interface definitionsThe interfaces are comprehensive and well-designed, providing clear type definitions for the dataset API functionality.
| const openai = new OpenAI({ | ||
| apiKey: process.env.OPENAI_API_KEY | ||
| }); |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
🛠️ Refactor suggestion
Add validation for OpenAI API key
The code doesn't validate if the OpenAI API key is present before creating the client. This could lead to runtime errors.
+ const openaiApiKey = process.env.OPENAI_API_KEY;
+ if (!openaiApiKey) {
+ console.warn("⚠️ OPENAI_API_KEY not found. Skipping LLM interaction simulation.");
+ // You could still continue with mock data or skip this section
+ return;
+ }
+
const openai = new OpenAI({
- apiKey: process.env.OPENAI_API_KEY
+ apiKey: openaiApiKey
});📝 Committable suggestion
‼️ IMPORTANT
Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.
| const openai = new OpenAI({ | |
| apiKey: process.env.OPENAI_API_KEY | |
| }); | |
| const openaiApiKey = process.env.OPENAI_API_KEY; | |
| if (!openaiApiKey) { | |
| console.warn("⚠️ OPENAI_API_KEY not found. Skipping LLM interaction simulation."); | |
| // You could still continue with mock data or skip this section | |
| return; | |
| } | |
| const openai = new OpenAI({ | |
| apiKey: openaiApiKey | |
| }); |
🤖 Prompt for AI Agents
In packages/sample-app/src/sample_dataset.ts around lines 98 to 100, the OpenAI
API key is used directly without validation, which may cause runtime errors if
the key is missing. Add a check before creating the OpenAI client to verify that
process.env.OPENAI_API_KEY is defined and not empty. If the key is missing,
throw an error or handle it gracefully to prevent proceeding with an invalid
configuration.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Important
Looks good to me! 👍
Reviewed a1c4ab6 in 1 minute and 17 seconds. Click for details.
- Reviewed
77lines of code in4files - Skipped
0files when reviewing. - Skipped posting
6draft comments. View those below. - Modify your settings and rules to customize what types of comments Ellipsis leaves. And don't forget to react with 👍 or 👎 to teach Ellipsis.
1. packages/traceloop-sdk/src/lib/client/dataset/column.ts:108
- Draft comment:
Wrap 'number' case logic in braces for proper scoping and consistency. - Reason this comment was not posted:
Confidence changes required:0%<= threshold50%None
2. packages/traceloop-sdk/src/lib/client/dataset/column.ts:121
- Draft comment:
Wrap 'date' case logic in braces for consistent scoping and improved readability. - Reason this comment was not posted:
Confidence changes required:0%<= threshold50%None
3. packages/traceloop-sdk/src/lib/client/dataset/dataset.ts:118
- Draft comment:
Removed the unused destructured variable in the .find() callback for cleaner code. - Reason this comment was not posted:
Confidence changes required:0%<= threshold50%None
4. packages/traceloop-sdk/src/lib/client/dataset/dataset.ts:248
- Draft comment:
Default parameters now infer type; explicit type annotations were removed in getRows method. - Reason this comment was not posted:
Confidence changes required:0%<= threshold50%None
5. packages/traceloop-sdk/src/lib/client/dataset/datasets.ts:33
- Draft comment:
Removed redundant explicit type annotations in list() parameters; default values sufficiently infer number types. - Reason this comment was not posted:
Confidence changes required:0%<= threshold50%None
6. packages/traceloop-sdk/src/lib/client/dataset/row.ts:112
- Draft comment:
Omitting the explicit type for the 'delimiter' parameter in toCSVRow leverages type inference and improves brevity. - Reason this comment was not posted:
Confidence changes required:0%<= threshold50%None
Workflow ID: wflow_N9QTwhaZ6Tj1nRok
You can customize
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 1
♻️ Duplicate comments (2)
packages/traceloop-sdk/src/lib/client/dataset/dataset.ts (2)
293-328: CSV parsing is simplistic and may not handle all edge casesThe custom CSV parsing implementation may not correctly handle complex CSV scenarios.
The parsing logic doesn't handle:
- Embedded newlines within quoted fields
- Escaped quotes (doubled quotes)
- Different line ending formats (CRLF vs LF)
- Edge cases with malformed CSV
Consider using a robust CSV parsing library like
csv-parseorpapaparsefor production use.
330-350: CSV line parsing has quote handling issuesThe quote detection logic in parseCSVLine is overly simplistic and may not correctly handle edge cases.
Specific issues:
- Doesn't handle escaped quotes (doubled quotes like
"He said ""Hello"")- Quote detection condition is too simplistic
- May incorrectly parse fields with quotes not at boundaries
Consider using a proven CSV library instead of this custom implementation.
🧹 Nitpick comments (1)
packages/traceloop-sdk/src/lib/client/dataset/dataset.ts (1)
49-55: Improve field access pattern for timestamp propertiesThe getters use fallback chains with type casting to handle API response variations, but this could be fragile and indicates inconsistent API responses.
Consider creating a helper method to handle timestamp field normalization:
+ private getTimestamp(field: 'createdAt' | 'updatedAt'): string { + return this._data[field] || + (this._data as any)[field === 'createdAt' ? 'created_at' : 'updated_at'] || + ''; + } get createdAt(): string { - return this._data.createdAt || (this._data as any).created_at || ''; + return this.getTimestamp('createdAt'); } get updatedAt(): string { - return this._data.updatedAt || (this._data as any).updated_at || ''; + return this.getTimestamp('updatedAt'); }
📜 Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
Plan: Pro
📒 Files selected for processing (12)
packages/traceloop-sdk/recordings/Dataset-Integration-Test_2732516487/should-create-and-manage-a-dataset_3398104721/recording.har(1 hunks)packages/traceloop-sdk/recordings/Dataset-Integration-Test_2732516487/should-list-datasets_1091121199/recording.har(1 hunks)packages/traceloop-sdk/recordings/Test-Dataset-API-Recording_2413299938/Column-Operations_3207658095/should-add-columns-to-dataset_1128156327/recording.har(1 hunks)packages/traceloop-sdk/recordings/Test-Dataset-API-Recording_2413299938/Dataset-Creation-and-Management_3667698088/should-create-a-new-dataset_1486295619/recording.har(1 hunks)packages/traceloop-sdk/recordings/Test-Dataset-API-Recording_2413299938/Dataset-Creation-and-Management_3667698088/should-get-dataset-by-slug_1748151842/recording.har(1 hunks)packages/traceloop-sdk/recordings/Test-Dataset-API-Recording_2413299938/Dataset-Creation-and-Management_3667698088/should-update-dataset_4001908675/recording.har(1 hunks)packages/traceloop-sdk/src/lib/client/dataset/base-dataset.ts(1 hunks)packages/traceloop-sdk/src/lib/client/dataset/column.ts(1 hunks)packages/traceloop-sdk/src/lib/client/dataset/dataset.ts(1 hunks)packages/traceloop-sdk/src/lib/client/dataset/datasets.ts(1 hunks)packages/traceloop-sdk/src/lib/client/dataset/row.ts(1 hunks)packages/traceloop-sdk/test/datasets-recording.test.ts(1 hunks)
✅ Files skipped from review due to trivial changes (2)
- packages/traceloop-sdk/recordings/Dataset-Integration-Test_2732516487/should-list-datasets_1091121199/recording.har
- packages/traceloop-sdk/recordings/Dataset-Integration-Test_2732516487/should-create-and-manage-a-dataset_3398104721/recording.har
🚧 Files skipped from review as they are similar to previous changes (9)
- packages/traceloop-sdk/recordings/Test-Dataset-API-Recording_2413299938/Dataset-Creation-and-Management_3667698088/should-create-a-new-dataset_1486295619/recording.har
- packages/traceloop-sdk/recordings/Test-Dataset-API-Recording_2413299938/Column-Operations_3207658095/should-add-columns-to-dataset_1128156327/recording.har
- packages/traceloop-sdk/test/datasets-recording.test.ts
- packages/traceloop-sdk/recordings/Test-Dataset-API-Recording_2413299938/Dataset-Creation-and-Management_3667698088/should-get-dataset-by-slug_1748151842/recording.har
- packages/traceloop-sdk/recordings/Test-Dataset-API-Recording_2413299938/Dataset-Creation-and-Management_3667698088/should-update-dataset_4001908675/recording.har
- packages/traceloop-sdk/src/lib/client/dataset/row.ts
- packages/traceloop-sdk/src/lib/client/dataset/column.ts
- packages/traceloop-sdk/src/lib/client/dataset/base-dataset.ts
- packages/traceloop-sdk/src/lib/client/dataset/datasets.ts
⏰ Context from checks skipped due to timeout of 90000ms. You can increase the timeout in your CodeRabbit configuration to a maximum of 15 minutes (900000ms). (1)
- GitHub Check: Build and test
🔇 Additional comments (10)
packages/traceloop-sdk/src/lib/client/dataset/dataset.ts (10)
1-16: LGTM: Clean imports and dependenciesThe imports are well-organized and include all necessary types and interfaces from the appropriate modules.
17-23: LGTM: Proper class structure and constructorThe class properly extends BaseDataset and maintains internal state through the private _data field.
57-61: LGTM: Proper refresh implementationThe refresh method correctly fetches updated data and handles the response appropriately.
63-73: LGTM: Update method with proper validation and refreshThe method correctly validates the name if provided and refreshes data after update since the API returns empty responses.
140-167: LGTM: Column retrieval with proper data extractionThe method correctly refreshes data and extracts columns from the dataset response format.
169-180: LGTM: Single row addition delegates to batch methodGood design pattern to reuse the batch logic for consistency.
182-230: LGTM: Proper batch row insertion with column mappingThe method correctly transforms column names to IDs for the API and transforms the response back to names.
257-276: LGTM: CSV import with batching for performanceThe method properly validates input and uses batching to improve performance for large datasets.
278-291: LGTM: Statistics and versioning methodsClean implementation of stats retrieval and version management methods.
352-371: LGTM: Appropriate value type parsingThe parseValue method correctly handles common CSV value types including null, boolean, numeric, and string values.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Important
Looks good to me! 👍
Reviewed 41abe67 in 45 seconds. Click for details.
- Reviewed
20lines of code in1files - Skipped
0files when reviewing. - Skipped posting
2draft comments. View those below. - Modify your settings and rules to customize what types of comments Ellipsis leaves. And don't forget to react with 👍 or 👎 to teach Ellipsis.
1. packages/sample-app/src/sample_dataset.ts:150
- Draft comment:
Good improvement using 'error instanceof Error ? error.message : String(error)' for robust error handling. Consider extracting the error message to a variable to avoid duplicating the logic. - Reason this comment was not posted:
Confidence changes required:33%<= threshold50%None
2. packages/sample-app/src/sample_dataset.ts:156
- Draft comment:
Updating the error response similarly is a good change. As with the log statement, consider reusing the computed error message to reduce duplication. - Reason this comment was not posted:
Confidence changes required:33%<= threshold50%None
Workflow ID: wflow_9nHxrY93SLmcJzAR
You can customize
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Important
Looks good to me! 👍
Reviewed 95ad80b in 1 minute and 14 seconds. Click for details.
- Reviewed
1138lines of code in9files - Skipped
0files when reviewing. - Skipped posting
3draft comments. View those below. - Modify your settings and rules to customize what types of comments Ellipsis leaves. And don't forget to react with 👍 or 👎 to teach Ellipsis.
1. packages/traceloop-sdk/src/lib/client/dataset/row.ts:37
- Draft comment:
getValue() uses '|| null' which may override valid falsy values (e.g. 0 or false). Consider checking property existence (e.g. using 'hasOwnProperty') instead. - Reason this comment was not posted:
Comment was not on a location in the diff, so it can't be submitted as a review comment.
2. packages/traceloop-sdk/src/lib/client/dataset/dataset.ts:323
- Draft comment:
The custom CSV parser may not handle all edge cases (e.g. escaped quotes or embedded newlines). Consider using a well‐tested CSV parsing library. - Reason this comment was not posted:
Comment was on unchanged code.
3. packages/traceloop-sdk/src/lib/client/dataset/dataset.ts:299
- Draft comment:
In fromCSV(), rows are added in sequential batches. If API rate limits allow, consider parallelizing batch calls to improve performance. - Reason this comment was not posted:
Confidence changes required:33%<= threshold50%None
Workflow ID: wflow_Ri5h2ETtP1acIcsG
You can customize
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 0
♻️ Duplicate comments (2)
packages/traceloop-sdk/src/lib/client/dataset/dataset.ts (2)
92-156: Complex response parsing logic needs refactoring.The addColumn method handles two different API response formats with extensive 'any' casting, making it difficult to maintain and error-prone.
This issue was previously identified and still needs to be addressed. Consider extracting response parsing into separate helper methods for better maintainability.
366-386: Custom CSV parsing may not handle all edge cases.The parseCSVLine method implements basic CSV parsing but may not correctly handle complex cases like embedded newlines in quoted fields, escaped quotes, or other CSV edge cases.
Consider using a robust CSV parsing library for production use as previously suggested.
🧹 Nitpick comments (1)
packages/traceloop-sdk/src/lib/client/dataset/dataset.ts (1)
49-55: Consider improving timestamp handling and type safety.The timestamp getters use type casting and fallback to empty strings, which may not be ideal:
get createdAt(): string { - return this._data.createdAt || (this._data as any).created_at || ""; + return this._data.createdAt || (this._data as any).created_at || new Date().toISOString(); } get updatedAt(): string { - return this._data.updatedAt || (this._data as any).updated_at || ""; + return this._data.updatedAt || (this._data as any).updated_at || new Date().toISOString(); }Consider defining proper interfaces to eliminate the need for
anycasting and provide more meaningful defaults than empty strings.
📜 Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
Plan: Pro
📒 Files selected for processing (10)
packages/sample-app/src/sample_dataset.ts(1 hunks)packages/traceloop-sdk/src/lib/client/dataset/base-dataset.ts(1 hunks)packages/traceloop-sdk/src/lib/client/dataset/column.ts(1 hunks)packages/traceloop-sdk/src/lib/client/dataset/dataset.ts(1 hunks)packages/traceloop-sdk/src/lib/client/dataset/datasets.ts(1 hunks)packages/traceloop-sdk/src/lib/client/dataset/index.ts(1 hunks)packages/traceloop-sdk/src/lib/client/dataset/row.ts(1 hunks)packages/traceloop-sdk/src/lib/client/traceloop-client.ts(4 hunks)packages/traceloop-sdk/src/lib/interfaces/dataset.interface.ts(1 hunks)packages/traceloop-sdk/test/datasets-recording.test.ts(1 hunks)
🚧 Files skipped from review as they are similar to previous changes (9)
- packages/sample-app/src/sample_dataset.ts
- packages/traceloop-sdk/src/lib/client/dataset/column.ts
- packages/traceloop-sdk/src/lib/client/dataset/index.ts
- packages/traceloop-sdk/src/lib/client/traceloop-client.ts
- packages/traceloop-sdk/src/lib/client/dataset/datasets.ts
- packages/traceloop-sdk/src/lib/client/dataset/base-dataset.ts
- packages/traceloop-sdk/test/datasets-recording.test.ts
- packages/traceloop-sdk/src/lib/client/dataset/row.ts
- packages/traceloop-sdk/src/lib/interfaces/dataset.interface.ts
🔇 Additional comments (5)
packages/traceloop-sdk/src/lib/client/dataset/dataset.ts (5)
1-23: LGTM! Clean class structure and imports.The class structure follows good OOP principles with proper inheritance and encapsulation.
57-90: LGTM! Well-structured CRUD operations.The methods properly handle async operations, include appropriate validation, and the refresh-after-update pattern compensates for API limitations effectively.
189-280: LGTM! Well-designed row management with good patterns.The implementation uses good patterns like:
- Consistent batch API usage for single and multiple rows
- Proper input validation
- Column ID transformation for API compatibility
- Pagination support for efficient data retrieval
306-321: LGTM! Clean statistics and versioning methods.Simple, effective implementations with proper async handling and error management.
388-407: LGTM! Well-structured value parsing logic.The parseValue method handles type conversion appropriately with good precedence: null values, booleans, numbers, then strings as fallback.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Important
Looks good to me! 👍
Reviewed 55ba20b in 1 minute and 22 seconds. Click for details.
- Reviewed
493lines of code in2files - Skipped
0files when reviewing. - Skipped posting
5draft comments. View those below. - Modify your settings and rules to customize what types of comments Ellipsis leaves. And don't forget to react with 👍 or 👎 to teach Ellipsis.
1. packages/sample-app/src/sample_dataset.ts:177
- Draft comment:
CSV rows include leading whitespace; ensure the CSV parser trims these lines or remove indentation. - Reason this comment was not posted:
Comment was on unchanged code.
2. packages/sample-app/src/sample_dataset.ts:312
- Draft comment:
Safely extract the error message (check error instanceof Error) before accessing error.message. - Reason this comment was not posted:
Comment was on unchanged code.
3. packages/sample-app/src/sample_dataset.ts:113
- Draft comment:
Consider parallelizing independent API calls in the simulation loop if execution order isn’t critical. - Reason this comment was not posted:
Confidence changes required:40%<= threshold50%None
4. packages/sample-app/src/test_dataset_api.ts:40
- Draft comment:
Use a safe error extraction (e.g. checking error instanceof Error) when logging errors to avoid undefined properties. - Reason this comment was not posted:
Comment was on unchanged code.
5. packages/sample-app/src/test_dataset_api.ts:138
- Draft comment:
Consider using a dedicated testing framework instead of nested try/catch blocks for improved test reporting and isolation. - Reason this comment was not posted:
Comment was not on a location in the diff, so it can't be submitted as a review comment.
Workflow ID: wflow_sR8o6KVHneb6bvZt
You can customize
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Important
Looks good to me! 👍
Reviewed 2e07925 in 55 seconds. Click for details.
- Reviewed
70lines of code in1files - Skipped
0files when reviewing. - Skipped posting
6draft comments. View those below. - Modify your settings and rules to customize what types of comments Ellipsis leaves. And don't forget to react with 👍 or 👎 to teach Ellipsis.
1. packages/traceloop-sdk/test/datasets-recording.test.ts:7
- Draft comment:
Ensure the new FetchAdapter import is necessary for tests using fetch requests. - Reason this comment was not posted:
Comment did not seem useful. Confidence is useful =0%<= threshold50%The comment is asking the PR author to ensure that the new FetchAdapter import is necessary for tests. This falls under the category of asking the author to double-check or confirm something, which is against the rules.
2. packages/traceloop-sdk/test/datasets-recording.test.ts:20
- Draft comment:
Check that including both 'node-http' and 'fetch' adapters in setupPolly is intentional and works as expected. - Reason this comment was not posted:
Comment did not seem useful. Confidence is useful =0%<= threshold50%The comment is asking the author to confirm their intention and ensure that the behavior is as expected, which violates the rules. It doesn't provide a specific suggestion or point out a clear issue.
3. packages/traceloop-sdk/test/datasets-recording.test.ts:23
- Draft comment:
Verify that expanding the 'matchRequestsBy' options (method, body, order, url) meets the recording requirements without over-matching or hiding differences. - Reason this comment was not posted:
Comment did not seem useful. Confidence is useful =0%<= threshold50%The comment is asking the PR author to verify their changes, which violates the rule against asking for confirmation or verification. It doesn't provide a specific suggestion or point out a specific issue with the code.
4. packages/traceloop-sdk/test/datasets-recording.test.ts:46
- Draft comment:
Hardcoding dummy environment values in non-recording mode ensures consistency; confirm these values are isolated to test contexts only. - Reason this comment was not posted:
Comment did not seem useful. Confidence is useful =0%<= threshold50%The comment is asking the PR author to confirm that the hardcoded dummy environment values are isolated to test contexts only. This falls under asking the author to confirm their intention, which is against the rules.
5. packages/traceloop-sdk/test/datasets-recording.test.ts:75
- Draft comment:
Using a fixed dataset name in recorded mode is good for stability; ensure that this constant value won't cause collisions if tests run concurrently. - Reason this comment was not posted:
Comment did not seem useful. Confidence is useful =0%<= threshold50%The comment is asking the PR author to ensure that a constant value won't cause collisions, which is a form of asking them to double-check something. This violates the rule against asking the author to ensure behavior is intended or tested.
6. packages/traceloop-sdk/test/datasets-recording.test.ts:104
- Draft comment:
The comment noting the recorded response already shows the updated description is helpful; ensure future changes keep test expectations aligned with recorded data. - Reason this comment was not posted:
Confidence changes required:30%<= threshold50%None
Workflow ID: wflow_QTnc4RsHUz7qZBRg
You can customize
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Important
Looks good to me! 👍
Reviewed 26b57b5 in 29 seconds. Click for details.
- Reviewed
18lines of code in1files - Skipped
0files when reviewing. - Skipped posting
1draft comments. View those below. - Modify your settings and rules to customize what types of comments Ellipsis leaves. And don't forget to react with 👍 or 👎 to teach Ellipsis.
1. packages/traceloop-sdk/test/datasets-recording.test.ts:75
- Draft comment:
Formatting update: The ternary assignment for datasetName is now more readable. Ensure consistency across similar patterns. - Reason this comment was not posted:
Confidence changes required:0%<= threshold50%None
Workflow ID: wflow_fz5Wi0AmW5ZS6ku3
You can customize
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Important
Looks good to me! 👍
Reviewed 85f2547 in 2 minutes and 39 seconds. Click for details.
- Reviewed
1184lines of code in2files - Skipped
0files when reviewing. - Skipped posting
7draft comments. View those below. - Modify your settings and rules to customize what types of comments Ellipsis leaves. And don't forget to react with 👍 or 👎 to teach Ellipsis.
1. packages/traceloop-sdk/recordings/Dataset-Integration-Test_2732516487/should-create-and-manage-a-dataset_3398104721/recording.har:30
- Draft comment:
Dataset creation values (ID, slug, timestamps) are updated consistently. Verify these changes align with the API contract and expected test flows. - Reason this comment was not posted:
Confidence changes required:33%<= threshold50%None
2. packages/traceloop-sdk/test/datasets-recording.test.ts:22
- Draft comment:
Added 'recordFailedRequests: true' and changed matchRequestsBy.order to true. Confirm these settings are intentional and that request order remains deterministic. - Reason this comment was not posted:
Confidence changes required:50%<= threshold50%None
3. packages/traceloop-sdk/test/datasets-recording.test.ts:76
- Draft comment:
The fixed dataset name has been updated to use the new timestamp (2025-08-07T08-56-39-202Z). Ensure this change is intentional and aligns with the HAR recordings. - Reason this comment was not posted:
Confidence changes required:33%<= threshold50%None
4. packages/traceloop-sdk/recordings/Dataset-Integration-Test_2732516487/should-create-and-manage-a-dataset_3398104721/recording.har:485
- Draft comment:
The URL contains a timestamp with lowercase 't' and 'z' ("integration-test-2025-08-07t08-56-39-202z"). For consistency with the ISO format used elsewhere (e.g., in the startedDateTime with uppercase 'T' and 'Z'), consider normalizing the case. - Reason this comment was not posted:
Decided after close inspection that this draft comment was likely wrong and/or not actionable: usefulness confidence = 10% vs. threshold = 50% This appears to be a test recording file. The case difference in timestamps is likely not a functional issue since URLs are typically case-insensitive. The inconsistency seems purely cosmetic. The comment doesn't point to any actual problems that need fixing. Additionally, since this is a recording file, it's capturing actual HTTP traffic - changing the URL format might not even be possible if that's how the API expects to receive it. The inconsistency in timestamp formats could potentially indicate an underlying issue with how dates are being formatted in the codebase. Maybe there's a mix of date formatting functions being used? While date formatting consistency is generally good practice, in this case we're looking at URLs in a test recording file. The lowercase format in URLs is likely intentional or required by the API, and changing it could break functionality. The inconsistency between URL format and response format is not a problem that needs fixing. This comment should be deleted as it suggests a purely cosmetic change to a test recording file, doesn't identify a real issue that needs fixing, and could potentially cause problems if implemented.
5. packages/traceloop-sdk/recordings/Dataset-Integration-Test_2732516487/should-create-and-manage-a-dataset_3398104721/recording.har:605
- Draft comment:
Similarly, the URL on this line uses lowercase 't' and 'z' in the timestamp. It would be more consistent to match the standard ISO format (uppercase 'T' and 'Z') if applicable. - Reason this comment was not posted:
Decided after close inspection that this draft comment was likely wrong and/or not actionable: usefulness confidence = 10% vs. threshold = 50% This appears to be a test recording file that captures HTTP traffic. The timestamps in URLs are likely generated by test code. While consistency in formats is generally good, this is test data and the actual format doesn't impact functionality. The URLs work fine either way. Making this change would be purely cosmetic and not improve the code's behavior. The comment does point out an inconsistency in the codebase. Having consistent timestamp formats could make the code more maintainable and easier to understand. However, this is a test recording file containing historical HTTP traffic data. Changing timestamp formats in URLs here wouldn't affect the actual application code or behavior. It would just be modifying test data. The comment should be deleted as it suggests a purely cosmetic change to test data that wouldn't improve code quality or functionality.
6. packages/traceloop-sdk/recordings/Dataset-Integration-Test_2732516487/should-create-and-manage-a-dataset_3398104721/recording.har:722
- Draft comment:
Typo: In the dataset object, the 'slug' field uses lowercase ('integration-test-2025-08-07t08-56-39-202z') while the 'name' field uses uppercase 'T' and 'Z' ('integration-test-2025-08-07T08-56-39-202Z'). Please verify if this inconsistency in letter casing is intended. - Reason this comment was not posted:
Decided after close inspection that this draft comment was likely wrong and/or not actionable: usefulness confidence = 10% vs. threshold = 50% This appears to be intentional API behavior where slugs are always lowercase for URL compatibility while names preserve original casing. The comment is asking for verification of intended behavior, which violates our rules. We should not ask authors to verify things that appear to be working as designed. Additionally, this is not suggesting any actual code changes. Could this inconsistency cause bugs or usability issues that should be addressed? Maybe there's a good reason to make the casing consistent? No - slugs being lowercase is a common web practice for URLs, while preserving original name casing is good for display. This is standard practice and working as intended. Delete the comment. This is asking for verification of behavior that appears intentional and follows standard web practices. No actual code changes are being suggested.
7. packages/traceloop-sdk/recordings/Dataset-Integration-Test_2732516487/should-create-and-manage-a-dataset_3398104721/recording.har:941
- Draft comment:
Typo: In the POST request payload, the JSON property is labeled as "Rows" (with an uppercase 'R') whereas the response uses "rows" in lowercase. Please check if this casing is correct or should be consistent. - Reason this comment was not posted:
Decided after close inspection that this draft comment was likely wrong and/or not actionable: usefulness confidence = 10% vs. threshold = 50% The API appears to be working correctly despite the casing difference. The response is successful with status 201. This suggests the API is case-insensitive for this field. Additionally, this is a test file recording HTTP interactions, not the actual implementation code. The casing difference doesn't affect functionality and pointing it out doesn't add value. The casing inconsistency could indicate an underlying API design issue. If the API documentation specifies a particular casing, this could be violating that contract. Since this is a test recording file and the API works correctly, maintaining strict casing consistency here isn't critical. The actual API implementation is what matters, not the test recordings. Delete the comment. The casing difference is not impacting functionality, and this is just a test recording file, not implementation code.
Workflow ID: wflow_FYd3IbCSwt4tZ7J1
You can customize
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Important
Looks good to me! 👍
Reviewed 8e8c1e2 in 44 seconds. Click for details.
- Reviewed
85lines of code in4files - Skipped
0files when reviewing. - Skipped posting
4draft comments. View those below. - Modify your settings and rules to customize what types of comments Ellipsis leaves. And don't forget to react with 👍 or 👎 to teach Ellipsis.
1. packages/traceloop-sdk/src/lib/client/dataset/dataset.ts:326
- Draft comment:
Removed getStats method. Ensure clients no longer rely on stats functionality. - Reason this comment was not posted:
Comment did not seem useful. Confidence is useful =0%<= threshold50%The comment is asking the author to ensure that clients no longer rely on the removed functionality. This is a form of asking the author to double-check something, which violates the rules. The comment does not provide a specific suggestion or ask for a specific test to be written.
2. packages/traceloop-sdk/src/lib/interfaces/dataset.interface.ts:79
- Draft comment:
Removed DatasetStats interface. Confirm that no code still references this type. - Reason this comment was not posted:
Comment did not seem useful. Confidence is useful =0%<= threshold50%The comment is asking the PR author to confirm that no code references a removed interface. This is a request for confirmation, which violates the rule against asking the author to confirm their intention or to double-check things. Therefore, this comment should be removed.
3. packages/traceloop-sdk/src/lib/node-server-sdk.ts:15
- Draft comment:
Removed export of DatasetStats from node-server-sdk. Verify that consumers are updated accordingly. - Reason this comment was not posted:
Comment did not seem useful. Confidence is useful =0%<= threshold50%The comment is asking the PR author to verify that consumers are updated accordingly, which falls under the rule of not asking the author to ensure behavior is intended or to double-check things. This is not a specific code suggestion or a request for a test, so it should be removed.
4. packages/traceloop-sdk/test/datasets-comprehensive.test.ts:632
- Draft comment:
Removed the test for dataset statistics. Confirm that removal aligns with API feature changes. - Reason this comment was not posted:
Comment did not seem useful. Confidence is useful =30%<= threshold50%The comment is asking the PR author to confirm the removal of a test, which is not allowed according to the rules. However, it is specific about the removal of a test for dataset statistics and its alignment with API feature changes, which could be a significant change. The comment could be rephrased to suggest adding a test if necessary, but as it stands, it violates the rules.
Workflow ID: wflow_hcAo9bUjO2s3uJ3b
You can customize
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 3
🧹 Nitpick comments (4)
packages/traceloop-sdk/test/datasets-final.test.ts (4)
1-3: Consider using more specific imports.Using wildcard imports (
import * as) can lead to larger bundle sizes and make it harder to track dependencies. Consider importing only the specific types and classes needed.-import * as assert from "assert"; -import * as traceloop from "../src"; +import { strictEqual, ok } from "assert"; +import { TraceloopClient, ColumnResponse } from "../src";
15-26: Redundant test cases for client initialization.Both test cases verify the same functionality (
client.datasetsexistence). Consider consolidating these into a single test or making them more specific.describe("Client Initialization", () => { - it("should initialize TraceloopClient correctly", () => { + it("should initialize TraceloopClient with datasets client", () => { assert.ok(client); assert.ok(client.datasets); - console.log("✓ TraceloopClient initialized successfully"); - }); - - it("should have dataset client available", () => { - assert.ok(client.datasets); - console.log("✓ Dataset client is available on main client"); + console.log("✓ TraceloopClient and datasets client initialized successfully"); }); });
46-56: Test validates trivial object structure.This test only verifies that object properties exist after they're manually set, which doesn't provide meaningful validation. Consider testing actual dataset creation options validation or remove this test.
- describe("Dataset Interfaces", () => { - it("should create dataset options correctly", () => { - const createOptions = { - name: "test-dataset", - description: "Test description", - }; - - assert.ok(createOptions.name); - assert.ok(createOptions.description); - console.log("✓ Dataset creation options are properly structured"); - });
19-19: Remove console.log statements from tests.Console.log statements in tests can clutter output and are not necessary for test validation. Consider removing them or replacing with proper test reporters.
- console.log("✓ TraceloopClient initialized successfully"); - console.log("✓ Dataset client is available on main client"); - console.log("✓ Routes configured without project prefix per PR #3219"); - console.log("✓ All dataset methods are available"); - console.log("✓ Dataset creation options are properly structured"); - console.log("✓ Dataset response uses consistent snake_case format"); - console.log("✓ Dataset response structure is correct"); - console.log("✓ Column uses slug instead of id per PR #320"); - console.log("✓ Column properties are correctly structured"); - console.log("✓ Column timestamps use snake_case format");Also applies to: 24-24, 34-34, 42-42, 55-55, 75-75, 89-89, 107-107, 125-125, 141-141
📜 Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
Plan: Pro
📒 Files selected for processing (2)
packages/traceloop-sdk/recordings/Dataset-API-Comprehensive-Tests_1618738334/recording.har(1 hunks)packages/traceloop-sdk/test/datasets-final.test.ts(1 hunks)
🚧 Files skipped from review as they are similar to previous changes (1)
- packages/traceloop-sdk/recordings/Dataset-API-Comprehensive-Tests_1618738334/recording.har
🧰 Additional context used
🧬 Code Graph Analysis (1)
packages/traceloop-sdk/test/datasets-final.test.ts (2)
packages/traceloop-sdk/src/lib/client/traceloop-client.ts (1)
TraceloopClient(19-85)packages/traceloop-sdk/src/lib/interfaces/dataset.interface.ts (1)
ColumnResponse(32-38)
⏰ Context from checks skipped due to timeout of 90000ms. You can increase the timeout in your CodeRabbit configuration to a maximum of 15 minutes (900000ms). (1)
- GitHub Check: Build and test
🔇 Additional comments (1)
packages/traceloop-sdk/test/datasets-final.test.ts (1)
8-12: No HTTP calls indatasets-final.test.ts—hardcoded staging URL/API key used only for instantiationVerified that
packages/traceloop-sdk/test/datasets-final.test.tsdoes not perform any network requests or rely on real API calls (it only instantiatesTraceloopClientand asserts interface properties). Using the hardcoded"test-key"and stagingbaseUrlhere is safe for pure unit tests.
| describe("Route Configuration (PR #3219)", () => { | ||
| it("should configure routes without project prefix", () => { | ||
| // After PR #3219, dataset routes no longer require project prefix | ||
| // The SDK now uses direct /v2/datasets routes as per the updated API | ||
| assert.ok(client); | ||
| assert.ok(client.datasets); | ||
| console.log("✓ Routes configured without project prefix per PR #3219"); | ||
| }); | ||
|
|
||
| it("should have all required dataset methods", () => { | ||
| assert.ok(typeof client.datasets.create === "function"); | ||
| assert.ok(typeof client.datasets.get === "function"); | ||
| assert.ok(typeof client.datasets.list === "function"); | ||
| assert.ok(typeof client.datasets.findByName === "function"); | ||
| console.log("✓ All dataset methods are available"); | ||
| }); | ||
| }); |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
🛠️ Refactor suggestion
Missing verification for route configuration claims.
The test comments reference PR #3219 and claim that routes no longer require project prefix, but the test only verifies client existence and method availability. It doesn't actually verify the route configuration or URL structure.
Consider adding actual route verification or remove the misleading comments:
describe("Route Configuration (PR #3219)", () => {
- it("should configure routes without project prefix", () => {
- // After PR #3219, dataset routes no longer require project prefix
- // The SDK now uses direct /v2/datasets routes as per the updated API
- assert.ok(client);
- assert.ok(client.datasets);
- console.log("✓ Routes configured without project prefix per PR #3219");
- });
-
it("should have all required dataset methods", () => {
assert.ok(typeof client.datasets.create === "function");
assert.ok(typeof client.datasets.get === "function");
assert.ok(typeof client.datasets.list === "function");
assert.ok(typeof client.datasets.findByName === "function");
console.log("✓ All dataset methods are available");
});
});📝 Committable suggestion
‼️ IMPORTANT
Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.
| describe("Route Configuration (PR #3219)", () => { | |
| it("should configure routes without project prefix", () => { | |
| // After PR #3219, dataset routes no longer require project prefix | |
| // The SDK now uses direct /v2/datasets routes as per the updated API | |
| assert.ok(client); | |
| assert.ok(client.datasets); | |
| console.log("✓ Routes configured without project prefix per PR #3219"); | |
| }); | |
| it("should have all required dataset methods", () => { | |
| assert.ok(typeof client.datasets.create === "function"); | |
| assert.ok(typeof client.datasets.get === "function"); | |
| assert.ok(typeof client.datasets.list === "function"); | |
| assert.ok(typeof client.datasets.findByName === "function"); | |
| console.log("✓ All dataset methods are available"); | |
| }); | |
| }); | |
| describe("Route Configuration (PR #3219)", () => { | |
| it("should have all required dataset methods", () => { | |
| assert.ok(typeof client.datasets.create === "function"); | |
| assert.ok(typeof client.datasets.get === "function"); | |
| assert.ok(typeof client.datasets.list === "function"); | |
| assert.ok(typeof client.datasets.findByName === "function"); | |
| console.log("✓ All dataset methods are available"); | |
| }); | |
| }); |
🤖 Prompt for AI Agents
In packages/traceloop-sdk/test/datasets-final.test.ts around lines 28 to 44, the
test claims routes no longer require a project prefix (PR #3219) but only checks
client and method existence; update the test to assert the actual route/URL used
(or mock the HTTP layer and verify the request path is /v2/datasets without a
project prefix) or, if you don't want to test routing, remove the misleading
comments and change the test description to only assert method availability.
Ensure you either add a mock/spy that inspects the constructed request path and
assert it equals '/v2/datasets' for relevant calls, or simplify wording to avoid
implying route validation.
| it("should handle dataset response with snake_case fields", () => { | ||
| // Test that our interfaces use snake_case as per API format | ||
| const mockDatasetResponse = { | ||
| id: "test-id", | ||
| slug: "test-slug", | ||
| name: "test-name", | ||
| description: "test-description", | ||
| created_at: "2025-01-01T00:00:00Z", | ||
| updated_at: "2025-01-01T00:00:00Z", | ||
| columns: {}, | ||
| rows: [], | ||
| }; | ||
|
|
||
| assert.ok(mockDatasetResponse.id); | ||
| assert.ok(mockDatasetResponse.slug); | ||
| assert.ok(mockDatasetResponse.created_at); | ||
| assert.ok(mockDatasetResponse.updated_at); | ||
| console.log("✓ Dataset response uses consistent snake_case format"); | ||
| }); | ||
|
|
||
| it("should handle dataset response structure correctly", () => { | ||
| const mockDatasetResponse = { | ||
| id: "test-id", | ||
| slug: "test-slug", | ||
| name: "test-name", | ||
| columns: {}, | ||
| rows: [], | ||
| }; | ||
|
|
||
| assert.ok(typeof mockDatasetResponse.columns === "object"); | ||
| assert.ok(Array.isArray(mockDatasetResponse.rows)); | ||
| console.log("✓ Dataset response structure is correct"); | ||
| }); | ||
| }); |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
🛠️ Refactor suggestion
Tests validate manually created mock objects.
These tests create mock objects and then verify the properties that were just set, which doesn't validate actual API responses or interface compliance. Consider testing actual API response transformation or interface validation.
Replace with meaningful tests that validate actual API integration:
- it("should handle dataset response with snake_case fields", () => {
- // Test that our interfaces use snake_case as per API format
- const mockDatasetResponse = {
- id: "test-id",
- slug: "test-slug",
- name: "test-name",
- description: "test-description",
- created_at: "2025-01-01T00:00:00Z",
- updated_at: "2025-01-01T00:00:00Z",
- columns: {},
- rows: [],
- };
-
- assert.ok(mockDatasetResponse.id);
- assert.ok(mockDatasetResponse.slug);
- assert.ok(mockDatasetResponse.created_at);
- assert.ok(mockDatasetResponse.updated_at);
- console.log("✓ Dataset response uses consistent snake_case format");
- });
-
- it("should handle dataset response structure correctly", () => {
- const mockDatasetResponse = {
- id: "test-id",
- slug: "test-slug",
- name: "test-name",
- columns: {},
- rows: [],
- };
-
- assert.ok(typeof mockDatasetResponse.columns === "object");
- assert.ok(Array.isArray(mockDatasetResponse.rows));
- console.log("✓ Dataset response structure is correct");
- });
+ // TODO: Add tests that validate actual API responses or interface compliance
+ // Consider using fixtures or recorded responses instead of manually created mocks📝 Committable suggestion
‼️ IMPORTANT
Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.
| it("should handle dataset response with snake_case fields", () => { | |
| // Test that our interfaces use snake_case as per API format | |
| const mockDatasetResponse = { | |
| id: "test-id", | |
| slug: "test-slug", | |
| name: "test-name", | |
| description: "test-description", | |
| created_at: "2025-01-01T00:00:00Z", | |
| updated_at: "2025-01-01T00:00:00Z", | |
| columns: {}, | |
| rows: [], | |
| }; | |
| assert.ok(mockDatasetResponse.id); | |
| assert.ok(mockDatasetResponse.slug); | |
| assert.ok(mockDatasetResponse.created_at); | |
| assert.ok(mockDatasetResponse.updated_at); | |
| console.log("✓ Dataset response uses consistent snake_case format"); | |
| }); | |
| it("should handle dataset response structure correctly", () => { | |
| const mockDatasetResponse = { | |
| id: "test-id", | |
| slug: "test-slug", | |
| name: "test-name", | |
| columns: {}, | |
| rows: [], | |
| }; | |
| assert.ok(typeof mockDatasetResponse.columns === "object"); | |
| assert.ok(Array.isArray(mockDatasetResponse.rows)); | |
| console.log("✓ Dataset response structure is correct"); | |
| }); | |
| }); | |
| // TODO: Add tests that validate actual API responses or interface compliance | |
| // Consider using fixtures or recorded responses instead of manually created mocks | |
| }); |
🤖 Prompt for AI Agents
In packages/traceloop-sdk/test/datasets-final.test.ts around lines 58 to 91, the
two tests simply assert properties on objects they construct themselves (which
doesn't validate API responses or transformation logic); replace them with
meaningful tests that exercise real code paths: either call the function that
transforms/normalizes API responses (or a mocked HTTP client that returns a
recorded API fixture) and assert the transformed object shape and types (e.g.,
check snake_case fields exist on raw response and that the SDK returns the
expected camelCase/typed object), or use a schema validator (zod/ajv) against a
stored API fixture to confirm interface compliance; remove the tautological
asserts, load a realistic fixture or mock network response, invoke the actual
parser/HTTP client, and assert deep equality/shape and type checks for
created_at/updated_at parsing and columns/rows structure.
| describe("Column Interfaces (PR #320)", () => { | ||
| it("should use slug instead of id for columns", () => { | ||
| // Test that column interfaces use slug instead of id (PR #320) | ||
| const mockColumnResponse: traceloop.ColumnResponse = { | ||
| slug: "test-column-slug", | ||
| name: "Test Column", | ||
| type: "string", | ||
| datasetId: "dataset-id", | ||
| datasetSlug: "dataset-slug", | ||
| created_at: "2025-01-01T00:00:00Z", | ||
| updated_at: "2025-01-01T00:00:00Z", | ||
| }; | ||
|
|
||
| assert.strictEqual(mockColumnResponse.slug, "test-column-slug"); | ||
| console.log("✓ Column uses slug instead of id per PR #320"); | ||
| }); | ||
|
|
||
| it("should have correct column properties", () => { | ||
| const mockColumnResponse: traceloop.ColumnResponse = { | ||
| slug: "test-column-slug", | ||
| name: "Test Column", | ||
| type: "string", | ||
| datasetId: "dataset-id", | ||
| datasetSlug: "dataset-slug", | ||
| created_at: "2025-01-01T00:00:00Z", | ||
| updated_at: "2025-01-01T00:00:00Z", | ||
| }; | ||
|
|
||
| assert.strictEqual(mockColumnResponse.name, "Test Column"); | ||
| assert.strictEqual(mockColumnResponse.type, "string"); | ||
| assert.ok(mockColumnResponse.datasetId); | ||
| assert.ok(mockColumnResponse.datasetSlug); | ||
| console.log("✓ Column properties are correctly structured"); | ||
| }); | ||
|
|
||
| it("should use snake_case for column timestamps", () => { | ||
| const mockColumnResponse: traceloop.ColumnResponse = { | ||
| slug: "test-column-slug", | ||
| name: "Test Column", | ||
| type: "string", | ||
| datasetId: "dataset-id", | ||
| datasetSlug: "dataset-slug", | ||
| created_at: "2025-01-01T00:00:00Z", | ||
| updated_at: "2025-01-01T00:00:00Z", | ||
| }; | ||
|
|
||
| assert.ok(mockColumnResponse.created_at); | ||
| assert.ok(mockColumnResponse.updated_at); | ||
| console.log("✓ Column timestamps use snake_case format"); | ||
| }); | ||
| }); |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
🛠️ Refactor suggestion
Column interface tests suffer from same mocking issues.
Similar to the dataset tests, these create mock ColumnResponse objects and validate properties that were just set. The tests reference PR #320 but don't actually verify the claimed behavior changes.
Consider replacing these with tests that validate actual column interface behavior:
describe("Column Interfaces (PR #320)", () => {
- it("should use slug instead of id for columns", () => {
- // Test that column interfaces use slug instead of id (PR #320)
- const mockColumnResponse: traceloop.ColumnResponse = {
- slug: "test-column-slug",
- name: "Test Column",
- type: "string",
- datasetId: "dataset-id",
- datasetSlug: "dataset-slug",
- created_at: "2025-01-01T00:00:00Z",
- updated_at: "2025-01-01T00:00:00Z",
- };
-
- assert.strictEqual(mockColumnResponse.slug, "test-column-slug");
- console.log("✓ Column uses slug instead of id per PR #320");
- });
-
- it("should have correct column properties", () => {
- const mockColumnResponse: traceloop.ColumnResponse = {
- slug: "test-column-slug",
- name: "Test Column",
- type: "string",
- datasetId: "dataset-id",
- datasetSlug: "dataset-slug",
- created_at: "2025-01-01T00:00:00Z",
- updated_at: "2025-01-01T00:00:00Z",
- };
-
- assert.strictEqual(mockColumnResponse.name, "Test Column");
- assert.strictEqual(mockColumnResponse.type, "string");
- assert.ok(mockColumnResponse.datasetId);
- assert.ok(mockColumnResponse.datasetSlug);
- console.log("✓ Column properties are correctly structured");
- });
-
- it("should use snake_case for column timestamps", () => {
- const mockColumnResponse: traceloop.ColumnResponse = {
- slug: "test-column-slug",
- name: "Test Column",
- type: "string",
- datasetId: "dataset-id",
- datasetSlug: "dataset-slug",
- created_at: "2025-01-01T00:00:00Z",
- updated_at: "2025-01-01T00:00:00Z",
- };
-
- assert.ok(mockColumnResponse.created_at);
- assert.ok(mockColumnResponse.updated_at);
- console.log("✓ Column timestamps use snake_case format");
- });
+ // TODO: Add meaningful tests that validate ColumnResponse interface compliance
+ // and actual API behavior rather than manually created mock objects
});📝 Committable suggestion
‼️ IMPORTANT
Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.
| describe("Column Interfaces (PR #320)", () => { | |
| it("should use slug instead of id for columns", () => { | |
| // Test that column interfaces use slug instead of id (PR #320) | |
| const mockColumnResponse: traceloop.ColumnResponse = { | |
| slug: "test-column-slug", | |
| name: "Test Column", | |
| type: "string", | |
| datasetId: "dataset-id", | |
| datasetSlug: "dataset-slug", | |
| created_at: "2025-01-01T00:00:00Z", | |
| updated_at: "2025-01-01T00:00:00Z", | |
| }; | |
| assert.strictEqual(mockColumnResponse.slug, "test-column-slug"); | |
| console.log("✓ Column uses slug instead of id per PR #320"); | |
| }); | |
| it("should have correct column properties", () => { | |
| const mockColumnResponse: traceloop.ColumnResponse = { | |
| slug: "test-column-slug", | |
| name: "Test Column", | |
| type: "string", | |
| datasetId: "dataset-id", | |
| datasetSlug: "dataset-slug", | |
| created_at: "2025-01-01T00:00:00Z", | |
| updated_at: "2025-01-01T00:00:00Z", | |
| }; | |
| assert.strictEqual(mockColumnResponse.name, "Test Column"); | |
| assert.strictEqual(mockColumnResponse.type, "string"); | |
| assert.ok(mockColumnResponse.datasetId); | |
| assert.ok(mockColumnResponse.datasetSlug); | |
| console.log("✓ Column properties are correctly structured"); | |
| }); | |
| it("should use snake_case for column timestamps", () => { | |
| const mockColumnResponse: traceloop.ColumnResponse = { | |
| slug: "test-column-slug", | |
| name: "Test Column", | |
| type: "string", | |
| datasetId: "dataset-id", | |
| datasetSlug: "dataset-slug", | |
| created_at: "2025-01-01T00:00:00Z", | |
| updated_at: "2025-01-01T00:00:00Z", | |
| }; | |
| assert.ok(mockColumnResponse.created_at); | |
| assert.ok(mockColumnResponse.updated_at); | |
| console.log("✓ Column timestamps use snake_case format"); | |
| }); | |
| }); | |
| describe("Column Interfaces (PR #320)", () => { | |
| // TODO: Add meaningful tests that validate ColumnResponse interface compliance | |
| // and actual API behavior rather than manually created mock objects | |
| }); |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Important
Looks good to me! 👍
Reviewed 132dd45 in 1 minute and 11 seconds. Click for details.
- Reviewed
1783lines of code in3files - Skipped
0files when reviewing. - Skipped posting
4draft comments. View those below. - Modify your settings and rules to customize what types of comments Ellipsis leaves. And don't forget to react with 👍 or 👎 to teach Ellipsis.
1. packages/traceloop-sdk/src/lib/interfaces/dataset.interface.ts:11
- Draft comment:
Consider normalizing timestamp field names to camelCase (e.g. createdAt, updatedAt) to match the SDK’s promise of camelCase API responses. - Reason this comment was not posted:
Comment was not on a location in the diff, so it can't be submitted as a review comment.
2. packages/traceloop-sdk/test/datasets-comprehensive.test.ts:187
- Draft comment:
When mapping column values for row creation, the test uses the column name as key. For robustness (especially with custom slugs), consider using the column slug as the key. - Reason this comment was not posted:
Comment was not on a location in the diff, so it can't be submitted as a review comment.
3. packages/traceloop-sdk/test/datasets-comprehensive.test.ts:289
- Draft comment:
In the column validation tests, consider adding test cases for boolean and date types, ensuring full coverage of allowed types. - Reason this comment was not posted:
Comment was not on a location in the diff, so it can't be submitted as a review comment.
4. packages/traceloop-sdk/test/datasets-comprehensive.test.ts:583
- Draft comment:
Row cloning test asserts that the clone retains the original row id. Confirm that this behavior is intentional; if cloning is meant for new row creation, the id might need to be excluded. - Reason this comment was not posted:
Comment was not on a location in the diff, so it can't be submitted as a review comment.
Workflow ID: wflow_k1THyZix5EgJ5KsP
You can customize
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 1
♻️ Duplicate comments (13)
packages/traceloop-sdk/test/datasets-comprehensive.test.ts (3)
46-49: Security Risk: API Key Exposure in RecordingsThe API key from environment variables could be captured in Polly recordings and exposed if these recordings are committed to the repository.
348-357: Add defensive checks for column propertiesThe test assumes all column properties exist but doesn't handle potential null or undefined values, which could cause runtime errors.
459-462: Fix incorrect assertion logic in row update testThe test uses
assert.notStrictEqualafter refreshing the row, which incorrectly expects the refreshed value to differ. The test should verify that the server persisted the updated value correctly.Apply this fix to properly verify the update:
await rowObj.update({ data: updateData }); await rowObj.refresh(); - assert.notStrictEqual(rowObj.data[firstKey], originalData[firstKey]); + assert.strictEqual(rowObj.data[firstKey], "Updated Value"); console.log("✓ Updated row data successfully");packages/traceloop-sdk/src/lib/client/dataset/dataset.ts (10)
90-179: Simplify complex response handling in addColumnThe
addColumnmethod has overly complex logic to handle different API response formats with extensive type casting and multiple conditional branches.Extract response parsing into helper methods:
private parseDirectColumnResponse(data: any, column: ColumnDefinition): ColumnResponse { return { slug: data.slug || data, datasetId: this._data.id, datasetSlug: this._data.slug, name: data.name || column.name, type: data.type || column.type, required: data.required !== undefined ? data.required : column.required || false, description: data.description || column.description, createdAt: data.created_at || data.createdAt || new Date().toISOString(), updatedAt: data.updated_at || data.updatedAt || new Date().toISOString() }; } private parseColumnFromDataset(data: any, column: ColumnDefinition): ColumnResponse | null { const dataWithColumns = data as any; if (!dataWithColumns.columns) return null; const columnEntries = Object.entries(dataWithColumns.columns); const newColumn = columnEntries.find(([, col]: [string, any]) => col.name === column.name); if (!newColumn) return null; const [columnSlug, columnData] = newColumn; const col = columnData as any; return { slug: columnSlug, datasetId: this._data.id, datasetSlug: this._data.slug, name: col.name, type: col.type, required: col.required !== undefined ? col.required : column.required || false, description: col.description, createdAt: col.created_at || col.createdAt || this.createdAt, updatedAt: col.updated_at || col.updatedAt || this.updatedAt }; } async addColumn(column: ColumnDefinition): Promise<ColumnResponse> { if (!column.name || typeof column.name !== "string") { throw new Error("Column name is required and must be a string"); } const response = await this.client.post(`/v2/datasets/${this.slug}/columns`, column); const data = await this.handleResponse(response); // Try direct column response if (data && (data.column || data.slug || typeof data === 'string')) { return this.parseDirectColumnResponse(data.column || data, column); } // Try extracting from dataset response this._data = data; const columnResponse = this.parseColumnFromDataset(data, column); if (columnResponse) { return columnResponse; } throw new Error("Failed to create column or extract column from response"); }
114-115: Fix inconsistent property naming in column responsesThe ColumnResponse interface expects camelCase properties (
createdAt,updatedAt) but the code returns snake_case properties (created_at,updated_at). This type inconsistency could cause runtime issues.Apply this fix throughout the
addColumnmethod:- created_at: columnData.created_at || new Date().toISOString(), - updated_at: columnData.updated_at || new Date().toISOString(), + createdAt: columnData.created_at || columnData.createdAt || new Date().toISOString(), + updatedAt: columnData.updated_at || columnData.updatedAt || new Date().toISOString(),Also applies to: 128-129, 145-146, 172-173
201-202: Use column-specific timestamps in getColumnsThe method incorrectly uses dataset-level timestamps (
this.createdAt,this.updatedAt) instead of column-specific timestamps. This results in all columns having the same timestamps as the dataset.Apply this fix:
- created_at: this.createdAt, - updated_at: this.updatedAt, + createdAt: col.created_at || col.createdAt || this.createdAt, + updatedAt: col.updated_at || col.updatedAt || this.updatedAt,
243-245: Fix incorrect payload property casingThe payload uses
Rows(Pascal case) but the API expectsrows(camel case), which will cause the request to fail.Apply this fix:
const payload = { - Rows: transformedRows, + rows: transformedRows, };
259-260: Fix inconsistent property naming in row responsesSimilar to columns, the RowResponse interface expects camelCase properties but the code returns snake_case properties.
Apply this fix in both
addRowsandgetRows:- created_at: row.created_at, - updated_at: row.updated_at, + createdAt: row.created_at || row.createdAt || "", + updatedAt: row.updated_at || row.updatedAt || "",Also applies to: 300-301
232-241: Support rows keyed by column slugsThe current transformation only maps row keys when they are column names and drops keys that are already column slugs. This could cause data loss if rows are provided with slug keys.
Add support for both naming schemes:
columns.forEach((col) => { columnMap.set(col.name, col.slug); }); + const slugSet = new Set(columns.map((c) => c.slug)); + const transformedRows = rows.map((row) => { const transformedRow: { [key: string]: any } = {}; - Object.keys(row).forEach((columnName) => { - const columnSlug = columnMap.get(columnName); - if (columnSlug) { - transformedRow[columnSlug] = row[columnName]; - } - }); + Object.keys(row).forEach((key) => { + const columnSlug = columnMap.get(key); + if (columnSlug) { + transformedRow[columnSlug] = row[key]; + } else if (slugSet.has(key)) { + // Already a slug + transformedRow[key] = row[key]; + } + }); return transformedRow; });
288-303: getRows doesn't transform values back to column namesThe
getRowsmethod returns raw API data without transforming column slugs back to names, creating inconsistency withaddRowswhich does perform this transformation.Transform the response data consistently:
async getRows(limit = 100, offset = 0): Promise<RowResponse[]> { const response = await this.client.get( `/v2/datasets/${this.slug}/rows?limit=${limit}&offset=${offset}`, ); const data = await this.handleResponse(response); const rows = data.rows || []; + if (rows.length === 0) return []; + + const columns = await this.getColumns(); + const columnMap = new Map<string, string>(); + columns.forEach((col) => columnMap.set(col.name, col.slug)); + return rows.map((row: any) => ({ id: row.id, datasetId: this._data.id, datasetSlug: this._data.slug, - data: row.values || row.data || {}, - created_at: row.created_at || "", - updated_at: row.updated_at || "", + data: this.transformValuesBackToNames(row.values ?? row.data ?? {}, columnMap), + createdAt: row.created_at || row.createdAt || "", + updatedAt: row.updated_at || row.updatedAt || "", })); }
181-182: Avoid unconditional refresh in getColumnsThe method always calls
refresh()which causes unnecessary network overhead. It should only refresh when columns are not already cached.Optimize to refresh only when needed:
async getColumns(): Promise<ColumnResponse[]> { - await this.refresh(); + // Refresh only when columns are not present + if (!(this._data as any).columns) { + await this.refresh(); + } const dataWithColumns = this._data as any;
321-325: Optimize CSV import to avoid repeated column fetchingThe CSV import calls
addRowsin a loop, and eachaddRowscall fetches columns again, causing N+1 API calls for large CSV files.Pre-fetch columns once and reuse them:
+ // Build column map once for the whole import + const columns = await this.getColumns(); + const columnMap = new Map<string, string>(); + columns.forEach((col) => columnMap.set(col.name, col.slug)); + const batchSize = 100; for (let i = 0; i < rows.length; i += batchSize) { const batch = rows.slice(i, i + batchSize); - await this.addRows(batch); + await this.addRowsWithColumnMap(batch, columnMap); }Add this helper method:
private async addRowsWithColumnMap( rows: RowData[], columnMap: Map<string, string> ): Promise<RowResponse[]> { const slugSet = new Set(columnMap.values()); const transformedRows = rows.map((row) => { const transformedRow: { [key: string]: any } = {}; Object.keys(row).forEach((key) => { const columnSlug = columnMap.get(key); if (columnSlug) { transformedRow[columnSlug] = row[key]; } else if (slugSet.has(key)) { transformedRow[key] = row[key]; } }); return transformedRow; }); const payload = { rows: transformedRows }; const response = await this.client.post(`/v2/datasets/${this.slug}/rows`, payload); const result = await this.handleResponse(response); if (!result.rows) return []; return result.rows.map((row: any) => ({ id: row.id, datasetId: this._data.id, datasetSlug: this._data.slug, data: this.transformValuesBackToNames(row.values ?? row.data ?? {}, columnMap), createdAt: row.created_at || row.createdAt || "", updatedAt: row.updated_at || row.updatedAt || "", })); }
382-402: CSV parsing is simplistic and may not handle edge casesThe custom CSV parsing implementation may not correctly handle edge cases like embedded newlines within quoted fields, escaped quotes, or Unicode characters.
Consider using a robust CSV parsing library like
papaparseorcsv-parse:+ import { parse } from 'csv-parse/sync'; private parseCSV( csvContent: string, delimiter: string, hasHeader: boolean, ): RowData[] { - // Custom parsing logic... + const records = parse(csvContent, { + delimiter, + columns: hasHeader, + skip_empty_lines: true, + trim: true, + cast: true, + cast_date: false + }); + + if (!hasHeader) { + // Generate column headers if not present + return records.map((record: any[]) => { + const row: RowData = {}; + record.forEach((value, index) => { + row[`column_${index + 1}`] = value; + }); + return row; + }); + } + + return records; }
🧹 Nitpick comments (3)
packages/traceloop-sdk/test/datasets-comprehensive.test.ts (2)
383-396: Extract row data generation into helper functionThe row data generation logic is duplicated between single and multiple row tests.
Create a helper function to reduce duplication:
+ function generateRowData(columns: any[], index = 0): any { + const rowData: any = {}; + columns.forEach((column) => { + if (!column.name || !column.type) return; + if (column.type === "string") { + rowData[column.name] = index === 0 ? "Test Value" : `Test Value ${index}`; + } else if (column.type === "number") { + rowData[column.name] = index === 0 ? 42 : index * 10; + } else if (column.type === "boolean") { + rowData[column.name] = index === 0 ? true : index % 2 === 0; + } + }); + return rowData; + } // In the single row test: - const rowData: any = {}; - columns.forEach((column) => { - if (column.type === "string") { - rowData[column.name] = "Test Value"; - } else if (column.type === "number") { - rowData[column.name] = 42; - } else if (column.type === "boolean") { - rowData[column.name] = true; - } - }); + const rowData = generateRowData(columns); // In the multiple rows test: const rowsData: any[] = []; for (let i = 0; i < 3; i++) { - const rowData: any = {}; - columns.forEach((column) => { - if (column.type === "string") { - rowData[column.name] = `Test Value ${i}`; - } else if (column.type === "number") { - rowData[column.name] = i * 10; - } else if (column.type === "boolean") { - rowData[column.name] = i % 2 === 0; - } - }); - rowsData.push(rowData); + rowsData.push(generateRowData(columns, i)); }
20-60: Extract Polly configuration to reduce duplicationThe Polly configuration could be extracted to a constant or helper function for better maintainability.
Extract configuration:
+const POLLY_CONFIG = { + adapters: ["node-http", "fetch"], + persister: "fs", + recordIfMissing: false, + recordFailedRequests: true, + matchRequestsBy: { + method: true, + headers: false, + body: false, + order: false, + url: { + protocol: true, + username: true, + password: true, + hostname: true, + port: true, + pathname: true, + query: true, + hash: false, + }, + }, +}; before(async function () { // Setup Polly for recording/replaying HTTP requests polly = new Polly("Dataset API Comprehensive Tests", { - adapters: ["node-http", "fetch"], - persister: "fs", - recordIfMissing: false, + ...POLLY_CONFIG, mode: process.env.RECORD_MODE === "NEW" ? "record" : "replay", - recordFailedRequests: true, - matchRequestsBy: { - method: true, - headers: false, - body: false, - order: false, - url: { - protocol: true, - username: true, - password: true, - hostname: true, - port: true, - pathname: true, - query: true, - hash: false, - }, - }, });packages/traceloop-sdk/src/lib/client/dataset/dataset.ts (1)
335-338: Add method to fetch actual version dataThe
getVersionmethod only returns version metadata, not the actual version data/CSV content. Based on the review comment, there should be agetVersionCSVmethod.Would you like me to implement a
getVersionCSVmethod that fetches the actual version data? This would complement the existing metadata-only methods.async getVersionCSV(version: string): Promise<string> { const response = await this.client.get( `/v2/datasets/${this.slug}/versions/${version}/csv` ); if (!response.ok) { throw new Error(`Failed to get version CSV: ${response.statusText}`); } return await response.text(); }
📜 Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
Plan: Pro
📒 Files selected for processing (4)
packages/traceloop-sdk/src/lib/client/dataset/dataset.ts(1 hunks)packages/traceloop-sdk/src/lib/interfaces/dataset.interface.ts(1 hunks)packages/traceloop-sdk/src/lib/node-server-sdk.ts(1 hunks)packages/traceloop-sdk/test/datasets-comprehensive.test.ts(1 hunks)
🚧 Files skipped from review as they are similar to previous changes (2)
- packages/traceloop-sdk/src/lib/node-server-sdk.ts
- packages/traceloop-sdk/src/lib/interfaces/dataset.interface.ts
🧰 Additional context used
🧬 Code Graph Analysis (2)
packages/traceloop-sdk/test/datasets-comprehensive.test.ts (2)
packages/traceloop-sdk/src/lib/client/traceloop-client.ts (1)
TraceloopClient(19-85)packages/traceloop-sdk/src/lib/client/dataset/dataset.ts (1)
version(40-42)
packages/traceloop-sdk/src/lib/client/dataset/dataset.ts (4)
packages/traceloop-sdk/src/lib/interfaces/dataset.interface.ts (10)
DatasetResponse(11-22)DatasetUpdateOptions(6-9)DatasetPublishOptions(71-74)ColumnDefinition(24-30)ColumnResponse(32-38)RowData(47-49)RowResponse(51-58)CSVImportOptions(76-80)DatasetVersionsResponse(88-93)DatasetVersion(82-86)packages/traceloop-sdk/src/lib/client/traceloop-client.ts (1)
TraceloopClient(19-85)packages/traceloop-sdk/src/lib/client/dataset/row.ts (1)
data(25-27)packages/traceloop-sdk/src/lib/client/dataset/column.ts (2)
slug(13-15)name(17-19)
🔇 Additional comments (2)
packages/traceloop-sdk/test/datasets-comprehensive.test.ts (2)
265-267: Fix incorrect assertion logic in column update testThe test expects the column name to be "Updated Name" after refresh, but this assumes the API immediately reflects the update. Given that the column update endpoint might not be implemented, this assertion may fail for the wrong reason.
The test should capture the update value before refresh to properly validate:
const columnObj = new traceloop.Column(client, column); + const updatedName = "Updated Name"; await columnObj.update({ - name: "Updated Name", + name: updatedName, description: "Updated description", }); // Verify the update await columnObj.refresh(); - assert.strictEqual(columnObj.name, "Updated Name"); + assert.strictEqual(columnObj.name, updatedName); console.log("✓ Updated column successfully");Likely an incorrect or invalid review comment.
492-495: Fix incorrect assertion in partial update testSimilar issue to the row update test - the assertion should verify the updated value matches what was sent, not assume the refresh will show the change.
Apply this fix:
+ const updatedValue = "Partial Update Value"; - await rowObj.partialUpdate({ [firstKey]: "Partial Update Value" }); + await rowObj.partialUpdate({ [firstKey]: updatedValue }); await rowObj.refresh(); - assert.strictEqual(rowObj.data[firstKey], "Partial Update Value"); + assert.strictEqual(rowObj.data[firstKey], updatedValue); console.log("✓ Partial updated row data successfully");Likely an incorrect or invalid review comment.
| const result = await client.datasets.list(1, 10); | ||
|
|
||
| assert.ok(result); | ||
| assert.ok(Array.isArray(result.datasets)); | ||
| assert.ok(typeof result.total === "number" || result.total === undefined); | ||
| assert.ok(typeof result.page === "number" || result.page === undefined); | ||
| assert.ok(typeof result.limit === "number" || result.limit === undefined); | ||
| console.log(`✓ Listed datasets: ${result.datasets.length} found`); | ||
| }); |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
🛠️ Refactor suggestion
Improve dataset list validation
The test accepts undefined values for pagination properties but should verify that at least the datasets array is properly structured.
Strengthen the assertions to validate expected data structure:
assert.ok(result);
assert.ok(Array.isArray(result.datasets));
- assert.ok(typeof result.total === "number" || result.total === undefined);
- assert.ok(typeof result.page === "number" || result.page === undefined);
- assert.ok(typeof result.limit === "number" || result.limit === undefined);
+ // Pagination properties should be numbers when present
+ if (result.total !== undefined) {
+ assert.ok(typeof result.total === "number", "total should be a number");
+ }
+ if (result.page !== undefined) {
+ assert.ok(typeof result.page === "number", "page should be a number");
+ }
+ if (result.limit !== undefined) {
+ assert.ok(typeof result.limit === "number", "limit should be a number");
+ }
console.log(`✓ Listed datasets: ${result.datasets.length} found`);📝 Committable suggestion
‼️ IMPORTANT
Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.
| const result = await client.datasets.list(1, 10); | |
| assert.ok(result); | |
| assert.ok(Array.isArray(result.datasets)); | |
| assert.ok(typeof result.total === "number" || result.total === undefined); | |
| assert.ok(typeof result.page === "number" || result.page === undefined); | |
| assert.ok(typeof result.limit === "number" || result.limit === undefined); | |
| console.log(`✓ Listed datasets: ${result.datasets.length} found`); | |
| }); | |
| const result = await client.datasets.list(1, 10); | |
| assert.ok(result); | |
| assert.ok(Array.isArray(result.datasets)); | |
| // Pagination properties should be numbers when present | |
| if (result.total !== undefined) { | |
| assert.ok(typeof result.total === "number", "total should be a number"); | |
| } | |
| if (result.page !== undefined) { | |
| assert.ok(typeof result.page === "number", "page should be a number"); | |
| } | |
| if (result.limit !== undefined) { | |
| assert.ok(typeof result.limit === "number", "limit should be a number"); | |
| } | |
| console.log(`✓ Listed datasets: ${result.datasets.length} found`); | |
| }); |
🤖 Prompt for AI Agents
In packages/traceloop-sdk/test/datasets-comprehensive.test.ts around lines
89-97, the test currently allows pagination values to be undefined and only
lightly validates the response; tighten validation by asserting result.datasets
is an Array and every element is a non-null object, and require that
result.total, result.page, and result.limit are numbers (use typeof === "number"
assertions rather than allowing undefined); also assert result.datasets.length
matches expected bounds (e.g., >= 0 and <= limit) to ensure pagination
consistency.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Caution
Changes requested ❌
Reviewed 2684fa8 in 2 minutes and 9 seconds. Click for details.
- Reviewed
1741lines of code in6files - Skipped
0files when reviewing. - Skipped posting
2draft comments. View those below. - Modify your settings and rules to customize what types of comments Ellipsis leaves. And don't forget to react with 👍 or 👎 to teach Ellipsis.
1. packages/traceloop-sdk/src/lib/client/dataset/row.ts:37
- Draft comment:
Using '|| null' in getValue can incorrectly convert valid falsy values (like 0 or false) to null. Consider using the nullish coalescing operator (??) to preserve such values. - Reason this comment was not posted:
Comment was not on a location in the diff, so it can't be submitted as a review comment.
2. packages/traceloop-sdk/src/lib/interfaces/dataset.interface.ts:48
- Draft comment:
The RowData type now excludes Date, yet Column.validateValue still handles 'date' types. This inconsistency may lead to unexpected behavior, so please align the types. - Reason this comment was not posted:
Decided after close inspection that this draft comment was likely wrong and/or not actionable: usefulness confidence = 30% vs. threshold = 50% The comment raises a valid point about type consistency. However, it's possible that dates are meant to be serialized as strings in the RowData, which is a common pattern. Without seeing Column.validateValue implementation or understanding the full system design, I can't be certain this is actually a bug rather than intentional. I might be missing important context about how dates are handled in the system. The removal of Date could be intentional to enforce string serialization of dates. While the type inconsistency exists, I don't have strong evidence that this is actually causing problems rather than being an intentional design choice. Without more context about the system's date handling, we should not keep this speculative comment.
Workflow ID: wflow_mZHhf3UevsRb6FRj
You can customize
|
|
||
| if ( | ||
| options.type && | ||
| !["string", "number", "boolean"].includes(options.type) |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
In the update method, the allowed types are restricted to ['string', 'number', 'boolean'] while the interface permits 'date' as well. Consider including 'date' for consistency or updating the interface accordingly.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Important
Looks good to me! 👍
Reviewed 05fdc29 in 41 seconds. Click for details.
- Reviewed
22lines of code in1files - Skipped
0files when reviewing. - Skipped posting
1draft comments. View those below. - Modify your settings and rules to customize what types of comments Ellipsis leaves. And don't forget to react with 👍 or 👎 to teach Ellipsis.
1. packages/traceloop-sdk/src/lib/client/dataset/row.ts:38
- Draft comment:
Removed setValue method. Ensure this breaking change is intentional and update docs to instruct users to use update() or partialUpdate() for modifying row data. - Reason this comment was not posted:
Comment did not seem useful. Confidence is useful =50%<= threshold50%The comment is asking the author to ensure that the breaking change is intentional, which is not allowed. However, it also provides a specific suggestion to update the documentation, which is useful. The comment is partially useful.
Workflow ID: wflow_ZBHDZySSJ9lmZTxy
You can customize
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Important
Looks good to me! 👍
Reviewed 8f5e11b in 49 seconds. Click for details.
- Reviewed
48lines of code in2files - Skipped
0files when reviewing. - Skipped posting
2draft comments. View those below. - Modify your settings and rules to customize what types of comments Ellipsis leaves. And don't forget to react with 👍 or 👎 to teach Ellipsis.
1. packages/traceloop-sdk/src/lib/client/dataset/datasets.ts:69
- Draft comment:
The new delete method is implemented consistently with other dataset methods. Ensure that handleResponse correctly processes deletion responses. - Reason this comment was not posted:
Confidence changes required:0%<= threshold50%None
2. packages/traceloop-sdk/test/datasets-comprehensive.test.ts:762
- Draft comment:
Updated tests now use client.datasets.delete for dataset deletion, ensuring consistency with the new API design. - Reason this comment was not posted:
Confidence changes required:0%<= threshold50%None
Workflow ID: wflow_4eRpTfDKhxbUYn4c
You can customize
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 6
♻️ Duplicate comments (6)
packages/traceloop-sdk/recordings/Dataset-API-Comprehensive-Tests_1618738334/recording.har (3)
973-981: Fix JSON payload key casing: "Rows" should be "rows".Request body uses capitalized "Rows", which is inconsistent with the API and the rest of the codebase. Use lowercase.
- "text": "{\"Rows\":[{\"custom-score-slug\":42,\"name\":\"Test Value\"}]}" + "text": "{\"rows\":[{\"custom-score-slug\":42,\"name\":\"Test Value\"}]}"
859-861: "undefined" in URL indicates a missing dataset slug variable; fix and re-record.The request path contains "undefined", which points to a bug in the test/client constructing this URL. This should be the dataset slug (and the column slug if fetching a specific column).
Prefer updating the code and re-recording; if you must fix the HAR for now:
- "url": "https://api-staging.traceloop.com/v2/datasets/undefined/columns/test-dataset-comprehensive-1754995040293" + "url": "https://api-staging.traceloop.com/v2/datasets/test-dataset-comprehensive-1754995040293/columns/name"Also verify the test that triggers this request sets the dataset slug and intended column slug:
#!/bin/bash # Find code constructing dataset column URLs and check slug sources rg -n --pretty '/v2/datasets/.+/columns/.+' -A 3 -B 3 packages
2445-2452: Fix JSON payload key casing: "Rows" should be "rows" (error-path test).Maintain consistent request schema even in negative/error-path tests.
- "text": "{\"Rows\":[{}]}" + "text": "{\"rows\":[{}]}"packages/traceloop-sdk/src/lib/client/dataset/datasets.ts (2)
24-31: “Find by slug” is covered by get(slug)Re: prior comment “FindBySlug” — the get(slug) method already serves this use-case. If desired for clarity, consider renaming to getBySlug.
54-67: Add a convenience delete(slug) API on the collectionPrior review asked for “Delete dataset by slug.” Adding it here keeps collection-level ops centralized and complements get/create/list/findByName.
async findByName(name: string): Promise<Dataset | null> { this.validateDatasetName(name); const response = await this.client.get( `/v2/datasets?name=${encodeURIComponent(name)}`, ); const data: DatasetListResponse = await this.handleResponse(response); if (!data || !data.datasets || data.datasets.length === 0) { return null; } return new Dataset(this.client, data.datasets[0]); } + + async delete(slug: string): Promise<void> { + this.validateDatasetSlug(slug); + const response = await this.client.delete( + `/v2/datasets/${encodeURIComponent(slug)}` + ); + await this.handleResponse(response); + }packages/traceloop-sdk/src/lib/client/dataset/row.ts (1)
80-99: Good fix: no pre-mutation of internal state in partialUpdatePrevious review flagged mutating this._data before the API call. That has been removed — thanks.
🧹 Nitpick comments (4)
packages/traceloop-sdk/recordings/Dataset-API-Comprehensive-Tests_1618738334/recording.har (2)
27-29: Avoid pinning dynamic headers in recordings; exclude x-traceloop-sdk-version from matching and persistence.Hard-coding SDK version in recorded requests makes fixtures fragile across releases.
In Polly setup, exclude it from matching and optionally drop it before persisting:
polly.configure({ matchRequestsBy: { headers: { exclude: ['x-traceloop-sdk-version', 'user-agent', 'accept', 'accept-encoding'], }, }, }); polly.server.any().on('beforePersist', (_req, recording) => { recording.request.headers = (recording.request.headers || []).filter( h => h.name?.toLowerCase() !== 'x-traceloop-sdk-version' ); });
1-2648: Optional: Strip volatile response headers and network timings to stabilize fixtures and reduce noise.Headers like date, cf-ray, x-kong-request-id, and the timings block change every run and add churn to diffs.
Outside this file (in Polly setup):
polly.server.any().on('beforePersist', (_req, recording) => { const drop = new Set([ 'date','cf-ray','x-kong-request-id','x-kong-proxy-latency','x-kong-upstream-latency', 'server','via','strict-transport-security','permissions-policy','referrer-policy', 'cf-cache-status','content-encoding','transfer-encoding','connection' ]); recording.response.headers = (recording.response.headers || []).filter( h => !drop.has(h.name?.toLowerCase()) ); // Optionally drop timings if not used if (recording.timings) recording.timings = {}; });packages/traceloop-sdk/src/lib/client/dataset/datasets.ts (1)
33-52: Consider adding pagination options and consistent fallback shape for list()Currently, list() has no pagination/filtering and returns a minimal fallback shape. Adding options keeps API flexible and ensures consistent return types.
- async list(): Promise<DatasetListResponse> { - const response = await this.client.get(`/v2/datasets`); + async list(options: { page?: number; limit?: number; search?: string } = {}): Promise<DatasetListResponse> { + const params = new URLSearchParams(); + if (options.page != null) params.set("page", String(options.page)); + if (options.limit != null) params.set("limit", String(options.limit)); + if (options.search) params.set("search", options.search); + const qs = params.toString(); + + const response = await this.client.get(`/v2/datasets${qs ? `?${qs}` : ""}`); const data: DatasetListResponse = await this.handleResponse(response); if (!data || !data.datasets) { return { datasets: [], - total: 0, + total: 0, + ...(options.page != null ? { page: options.page } : {}), + ...(options.limit != null ? { limit: options.limit } : {}), }; } const datasets = data.datasets.map( (datasetData) => new Dataset(this.client, datasetData), ); return { ...data, datasets, }; }Verification needed:
- Ensure DatasetListResponse optionally includes page/limit (or adjust the return type accordingly).
- Confirm that replacing raw dataset items with Dataset instances is compatible with DatasetListResponse typings. If not, consider a separate return type for the SDK-level list response (e.g., with Dataset[]).
packages/traceloop-sdk/src/lib/client/dataset/row.ts (1)
101-106: Confirm handleResponse can handle 204/empty delete responsesIf DELETE returns 204 No Content, a naive JSON parse in handleResponse would throw. Ensure handleResponse short-circuits on 204/empty body, or bypass parsing here.
async delete(): Promise<void> { const response = await this.client.delete( `/v2/datasets/${this.datasetSlug}/rows/${this.id}`, ); - await this.handleResponse(response); + // If handleResponse already handles 204, keep it. Otherwise: + // if (response.status !== 204) await this.handleResponse(response); + await this.handleResponse(response); }
📜 Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
Plan: Pro
📒 Files selected for processing (6)
packages/traceloop-sdk/recordings/Dataset-API-Comprehensive-Tests_1618738334/recording.har(1 hunks)packages/traceloop-sdk/src/lib/client/dataset/column.ts(1 hunks)packages/traceloop-sdk/src/lib/client/dataset/datasets.ts(1 hunks)packages/traceloop-sdk/src/lib/client/dataset/row.ts(1 hunks)packages/traceloop-sdk/src/lib/interfaces/dataset.interface.ts(1 hunks)packages/traceloop-sdk/test/datasets-comprehensive.test.ts(1 hunks)
🚧 Files skipped from review as they are similar to previous changes (3)
- packages/traceloop-sdk/src/lib/interfaces/dataset.interface.ts
- packages/traceloop-sdk/test/datasets-comprehensive.test.ts
- packages/traceloop-sdk/src/lib/client/dataset/column.ts
🧰 Additional context used
🧬 Code Graph Analysis (1)
packages/traceloop-sdk/src/lib/client/dataset/row.ts (2)
packages/traceloop-sdk/src/lib/interfaces/dataset.interface.ts (3)
RowResponse(52-59)RowData(48-50)RowUpdateOptions(61-63)packages/traceloop-sdk/src/lib/client/traceloop-client.ts (1)
TraceloopClient(19-85)
🔇 Additional comments (3)
packages/traceloop-sdk/recordings/Dataset-API-Comprehensive-Tests_1618738334/recording.har (1)
1342-1349: Ignore payload casing suggestion
The SDK and test fixtures consistently use uppercaseValues(inrow.ts) andRows(indataset.ts) to match the API contract and existing recordings. Swapping to lowercase would break both the client implementation and its HAR-based tests.Likely an incorrect or invalid review comment.
packages/traceloop-sdk/src/lib/client/dataset/datasets.ts (1)
48-51: Verify DatasetListResponse.datasets element typeYou’re returning Dataset instances, not raw response shapes. If DatasetListResponse expects wire-format objects, this will be a type mismatch. Either:
- Change DatasetListResponse to accept Dataset[] in the SDK layer; or
- Return raw items here and provide a separate helper to wrap items into Dataset instances.
packages/traceloop-sdk/src/lib/client/dataset/row.ts (1)
112-134: Nice: removed redundant type annotation and robust CSV quoting
delimiter = ","infers string, and the quoting logic handles delimiter, quotes, and newlines correctly.
| { | ||
| "name": "authorization", | ||
| "value": "Bearer tl_9981e7218948437584e08e7b724304d8" | ||
| }, |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
💡 Verification agent
🧩 Analysis chain
Redact Authorization bearer tokens from recordings (credential leakage).
A real bearer token is persisted in the HAR. These artifacts live in the repo and can leak credentials. Redact before persisting and exclude from request matching.
Apply a quick inline fix in this file (repeat for all occurrences):
- "name": "authorization",
- "value": "Bearer tl_9981e7218948437584e08e7b724304d8"
+ "name": "authorization",
+ "value": "Bearer <REDACTED>"And add redaction to your Polly setup to prevent future leaks (outside this file):
// polly-setup.ts
polly.server.any().on('beforePersist', (_req, recording) => {
// Redact request Authorization header
const reqAuth = recording.request.headers?.find(h => h.name?.toLowerCase() === 'authorization');
if (reqAuth) reqAuth.value = 'Bearer <REDACTED>';
// Optionally redact from response as well if present
const resAuth = recording.response.headers?.find(h => h.name?.toLowerCase() === 'authorization');
if (resAuth) resAuth.value = '<REDACTED>';
});
// Also avoid matching by Authorization header to keep recordings stable
polly.configure({
matchRequestsBy: {
headers: {
exclude: ['authorization'],
},
},
});To scan the repo for any other leaked tokens:
🏁 Script executed:
#!/bin/bash
# Find bearer tokens persisted in recordings
rg -n --pretty $'"name":\\s*"authorization"[\\s\\S]{0,120}"value":\\s*"Bearer\\s+[^"<]+' \
| sed -E 's/(Bearer )([A-Za-z0-9_\-\.]+)/\1<REDACTED>/'Length of output: 140
🏁 Script executed:
#!/bin/bash
# List all HAR files under the recordings directory
echo "HAR files in packages/traceloop-sdk/recordings:"
find packages/traceloop-sdk/recordings -type f -name "*.har"
# Search for any Bearer token values in those HAR files
echo "Searching for Bearer tokens in HAR files:"
rg -n '"value":\s*"Bearer ' --pretty packages/traceloop-sdk/recordings || true
# Search for any authorization header entries in those HAR files
echo "Searching for authorization header names in HAR files:"
rg -n '"name":\s*"authorization"' --pretty packages/traceloop-sdk/recordings || trueLength of output: 5098
Redact persisted Authorization tokens in HAR recordings
Multiple real bearer tokens (25 occurrences) are present in
packages/traceloop-sdk/recordings/Dataset-API-Comprehensive-Tests_1618738334/recording.har.
These must be redacted to prevent credential leakage.
• File requiring redaction:
- packages/traceloop-sdk/recordings/Dataset-API-Comprehensive-Tests_1618738334/recording.har (lines 20, 140, 255, …, 2551)
Apply this inline change for each occurrence:
- "name": "authorization",
- "value": "Bearer tl_9981e7218948437584e08e7b724304d8"
+ "name": "authorization",
+ "value": "Bearer <REDACTED>"To automate bulk replacement across all HAR files:
find packages/traceloop-sdk/recordings -type f -name '*.har' \
-exec sed -i -E 's/("value":\s*"Bearer )[^"]+/\1<REDACTED>/g' {} +Additionally, update your Polly setup to redact tokens on-the-fly and prevent future leaks:
// polly-setup.ts
polly.server.any().on('beforePersist', (_req, recording) => {
const reqHeader = recording.request.headers?.find(h => h.name?.toLowerCase() === 'authorization');
if (reqHeader) reqHeader.value = 'Bearer <REDACTED>';
const resHeader = recording.response.headers?.find(h => h.name?.toLowerCase() === 'authorization');
if (resHeader) resHeader.value = '<REDACTED>';
});
polly.configure({
matchRequestsBy: {
headers: {
exclude: ['authorization'],
},
},
});Finally, verify no other tokens remain:
rg -n '"value":\s*"Bearer ' --pretty packages/traceloop-sdk/recordings \
| sed -E 's/(Bearer )([A-Za-z0-9_\-\.]+)/\1<REDACTED>/'🤖 Prompt for AI Agents
In
packages/traceloop-sdk/recordings/Dataset-API-Comprehensive-Tests_1618738334/recording.har
around lines 18-21 (and other occurrences listed e.g. lines 140, 255, …, 2551),
redaction is required: replace every Authorization header value that starts with
"Bearer " with "Bearer <REDACTED>" so no real tokens remain in the HARs; apply
this change for all occurrences in that file and across recordings directory.
Also update the Polly setup to mutate recordings before persisting so request
and response Authorization headers are replaced with redacted values and
configure Polly to exclude the Authorization header from request matching to
prevent future leaks. After changes, run a repository-wide check for any
remaining Authorization bearer values and confirm all are replaced.
| const response = await this.client.get(`/v2/datasets/${slug}`); | ||
| const data: DatasetResponse = await this.handleResponse(response); | ||
|
|
||
| return new Dataset(this.client, data); |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
🛠️ Refactor suggestion
URL-encode slug in dataset GET path
Protect against path issues (space, unicode, special chars) by encoding the slug.
- const response = await this.client.get(`/v2/datasets/${slug}`);
+ const response = await this.client.get(
+ `/v2/datasets/${encodeURIComponent(slug)}`
+ );📝 Committable suggestion
‼️ IMPORTANT
Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.
| const response = await this.client.get(`/v2/datasets/${slug}`); | |
| const data: DatasetResponse = await this.handleResponse(response); | |
| return new Dataset(this.client, data); | |
| const response = await this.client.get( | |
| `/v2/datasets/${encodeURIComponent(slug)}` | |
| ); | |
| const data: DatasetResponse = await this.handleResponse(response); | |
| return new Dataset(this.client, data); |
🤖 Prompt for AI Agents
In packages/traceloop-sdk/src/lib/client/dataset/datasets.ts around lines 27-30
the dataset GET path uses the raw slug which can break for spaces, unicode or
special characters; replace the raw slug with an encoded value (use
encodeURIComponent(slug)) when building the request path (e.g.
`/v2/datasets/${encodeURIComponent(slug)}`), and ensure you don't double-encode
if callers already encode — prefer encoding here and adjust callers/tests
accordingly.
| get createdAt(): string { | ||
| return this._data.created_at; | ||
| } | ||
|
|
||
| get updatedAt(): string { | ||
| return this._data.updated_at; | ||
| } |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
💡 Verification agent
🧩 Analysis chain
Align createdAt/updatedAt with response key transformation
PR notes say responses are normalized to camelCase. If handleResponse transforms keys, these getters should read createdAt/updatedAt. Otherwise, the current code will break under camelCase.
Option A (preferred): standardize on camelCase and update the interface.
- get createdAt(): string {
- return this._data.created_at;
- }
+ get createdAt(): string {
+ // if response-transformer applied, this is createdAt
+ // update the RowResponse interface accordingly
+ return (this._data as any).createdAt ?? this._data.created_at;
+ }
- get updatedAt(): string {
- return this._data.updated_at;
- }
+ get updatedAt(): string {
+ return (this._data as any).updatedAt ?? this._data.updated_at;
+ }And update the interface (outside this file):
// packages/traceloop-sdk/src/lib/interfaces/dataset.interface.ts
export interface RowResponse {
id: string;
datasetId: string;
datasetSlug: string;
data: RowData;
createdAt: string; // was created_at
updatedAt: string; // was updated_at
}Please confirm whether handleResponse applies key transformation here; if not, keep snake_case and remove the fallback.
🏁 Script executed:
#!/bin/bash
# Locate the implementation and references of handleResponse
rg -n "handleResponse" .
echo "----"
# Inspect the imports and context of row.ts to see how _data is populated
sed -n '1,20p' packages/traceloop-sdk/src/lib/client/dataset/row.tsLength of output: 3339
🏁 Script executed:
#!/bin/bash
# Inspect handleResponse implementation in BaseDataset
rg -n "protected async handleResponse" -n packages/traceloop-sdk/src/lib/client/dataset/base-dataset.ts -A20
echo "----"
# View the response-transformer to see how keys are transformed
sed -n '1,200p' packages/traceloop-sdk/src/lib/utils/response-transformer.tsLength of output: 2421
🏁 Script executed:
#!/bin/bash
# Show the entire handleResponse method to locate response transformation
sed -n '1,200p' packages/traceloop-sdk/src/lib/client/dataset/base-dataset.ts
echo "---- Searching for transformApiResponse usage ----"
rg -n "transformApiResponse" -n packages/traceloop-sdk/src/lib/client/dataset/base-dataset.ts -A3 -B3Length of output: 2567
🏁 Script executed:
#!/bin/bash
# Locate the RowResponse interface definition and its fields
rg -n "export interface RowResponse" -n packages/traceloop-sdk/src/lib/interfaces -A10 -B2Length of output: 1168
Fix RowResponse interface and Row getters to use camelCase
The handleResponse method applies transformApiResponse, converting all snake_case keys (e.g., created_at) to camelCase (e.g., createdAt). As a result, at runtime _data.created_at/_data.updated_at will be undefined. We need to standardize on camelCase throughout:
• Update the RowResponse interface to use createdAt/updatedAt.
• Update the Row getters to reference this._data.createdAt and this._data.updatedAt.
Locations to update:
- packages/traceloop-sdk/src/lib/interfaces/dataset.interface.ts
- packages/traceloop-sdk/src/lib/client/dataset/row.ts
Diff suggestions:
--- a/packages/traceloop-sdk/src/lib/interfaces/dataset.interface.ts
+++ b/packages/traceloop-sdk/src/lib/interfaces/dataset.interface.ts
@@ export interface RowResponse {
- created_at: string;
- updated_at: string;
+ createdAt: string;
+ updatedAt: string;
}--- a/packages/traceloop-sdk/src/lib/client/dataset/row.ts
@@ get createdAt(): string {
- return this._data.created_at;
+ return this._data.createdAt;
@@ get updatedAt(): string {
- return this._data.updated_at;
+ return this._data.updatedAt;
}📝 Committable suggestion
‼️ IMPORTANT
Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.
| get createdAt(): string { | |
| return this._data.created_at; | |
| } | |
| get updatedAt(): string { | |
| return this._data.updated_at; | |
| } | |
| // packages/traceloop-sdk/src/lib/interfaces/dataset.interface.ts | |
| export interface RowResponse { | |
| // … other fields … | |
| createdAt: string; | |
| updatedAt: string; | |
| } |
| get createdAt(): string { | |
| return this._data.created_at; | |
| } | |
| get updatedAt(): string { | |
| return this._data.updated_at; | |
| } | |
| // packages/traceloop-sdk/src/lib/client/dataset/row.ts | |
| get createdAt(): string { | |
| return this._data.createdAt; | |
| } | |
| get updatedAt(): string { | |
| return this._data.updatedAt; | |
| } |
🤖 Prompt for AI Agents
In packages/traceloop-sdk/src/lib/client/dataset/row.ts around lines 29-35 and
packages/traceloop-sdk/src/lib/interfaces/dataset.interface.ts, the code still
expects snake_case fields (created_at/updated_at) but transformApiResponse
converts response keys to camelCase; update the RowResponse interface in
dataset.interface.ts to use createdAt and updatedAt, and update the Row getters
in row.ts to return this._data.createdAt and this._data.updatedAt respectively
so the runtime properties match the transformed response.
| getValue(columnName: string): string | number | boolean | Date | null { | ||
| return this._data.data[columnName] || null; | ||
| } |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Fix falsy value handling and type for getValue()
Using || null collapses valid falsy values (0, false, "") to null. Also, RowData doesn’t include Date.
- getValue(columnName: string): string | number | boolean | Date | null {
- return this._data.data[columnName] || null;
- }
+ getValue(columnName: string): string | number | boolean | null {
+ const value = this._data.data[columnName];
+ return value === undefined ? null : (value as string | number | boolean | null);
+ }📝 Committable suggestion
‼️ IMPORTANT
Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.
| getValue(columnName: string): string | number | boolean | Date | null { | |
| return this._data.data[columnName] || null; | |
| } | |
| getValue(columnName: string): string | number | boolean | null { | |
| const value = this._data.data[columnName]; | |
| return value === undefined ? null : (value as string | number | boolean | null); | |
| } |
🤖 Prompt for AI Agents
In packages/traceloop-sdk/src/lib/client/dataset/row.ts around lines 37 to 39,
getValue currently uses `|| null` which converts valid falsy values (0, false,
"") to null and its return type omits Date; change the existence check to
preserve falsy values (e.g., use hasOwnProperty(columnName) or check for
undefined) and return the actual stored value when the key exists, otherwise
return null, and update the RowData/type definitions and this method's return
type to include Date in the allowed types.
| const updatedData = { ...this._data.data, ...options.data }; | ||
|
|
||
| const response = await this.client.put( | ||
| `/v2/datasets/${this.datasetSlug}/rows/${this.id}`, | ||
| { | ||
| Values: updatedData, | ||
| }, | ||
| ); |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Use API-consistent payload key for update()
Payload uses Values (capital V), which likely doesn’t match the server contract. RowUpdateOptions specifies data, and partialUpdate mirrors this.
- const response = await this.client.put(
- `/v2/datasets/${this.datasetSlug}/rows/${this.id}`,
- {
- Values: updatedData,
- },
- );
+ const response = await this.client.put(
+ `/v2/datasets/${this.datasetSlug}/rows/${this.id}`,
+ {
+ data: updatedData,
+ },
+ );📝 Committable suggestion
‼️ IMPORTANT
Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.
| const updatedData = { ...this._data.data, ...options.data }; | |
| const response = await this.client.put( | |
| `/v2/datasets/${this.datasetSlug}/rows/${this.id}`, | |
| { | |
| Values: updatedData, | |
| }, | |
| ); | |
| const updatedData = { ...this._data.data, ...options.data }; | |
| const response = await this.client.put( | |
| `/v2/datasets/${this.datasetSlug}/rows/${this.id}`, | |
| { | |
| data: updatedData, | |
| }, | |
| ); |
🤖 Prompt for AI Agents
In packages/traceloop-sdk/src/lib/client/dataset/row.ts around lines 62 to 69,
the update payload is using the key "Values" which is inconsistent with the
RowUpdateOptions and server contract; change the payload to use the
API-consistent key "data" and send updatedData under that key (and update any
other partialUpdate usages to match), ensuring the request body shape matches
the server's expected { data: ... } format.
| async partialUpdate(updates: Partial<RowData>): Promise<void> { | ||
| if (!updates || typeof updates !== "object") { | ||
| throw new Error("Updates must be a valid object"); | ||
| } | ||
|
|
||
| const response = await this.client.put( | ||
| `/v2/datasets/${this.datasetSlug}/rows/${this.id}`, | ||
| { | ||
| Values: updates, | ||
| }, | ||
| ); | ||
|
|
||
| const result = await this.handleResponse(response); | ||
|
|
||
| if (result && result.id) { | ||
| this._data = result; | ||
| } else { | ||
| await this.refresh(); | ||
| } | ||
| } |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Use API-consistent payload key for partialUpdate()
Same issue as update(): use data, not Values.
- const response = await this.client.put(
- `/v2/datasets/${this.datasetSlug}/rows/${this.id}`,
- {
- Values: updates,
- },
- );
+ const response = await this.client.put(
+ `/v2/datasets/${this.datasetSlug}/rows/${this.id}`,
+ {
+ data: updates,
+ },
+ );📝 Committable suggestion
‼️ IMPORTANT
Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.
| async partialUpdate(updates: Partial<RowData>): Promise<void> { | |
| if (!updates || typeof updates !== "object") { | |
| throw new Error("Updates must be a valid object"); | |
| } | |
| const response = await this.client.put( | |
| `/v2/datasets/${this.datasetSlug}/rows/${this.id}`, | |
| { | |
| Values: updates, | |
| }, | |
| ); | |
| const result = await this.handleResponse(response); | |
| if (result && result.id) { | |
| this._data = result; | |
| } else { | |
| await this.refresh(); | |
| } | |
| } | |
| async partialUpdate(updates: Partial<RowData>): Promise<void> { | |
| if (!updates || typeof updates !== "object") { | |
| throw new Error("Updates must be a valid object"); | |
| } | |
| const response = await this.client.put( | |
| `/v2/datasets/${this.datasetSlug}/rows/${this.id}`, | |
| { | |
| data: updates, | |
| }, | |
| ); | |
| const result = await this.handleResponse(response); | |
| if (result && result.id) { | |
| this._data = result; | |
| } else { | |
| await this.refresh(); | |
| } | |
| } |
🤖 Prompt for AI Agents
In packages/traceloop-sdk/src/lib/client/dataset/row.ts around lines 80 to 99,
the partialUpdate() payload uses the wrong key "Values" instead of the
API-consistent "data"; update the request body to send { data: updates }
(matching update()), keep the rest of the logic intact so handleResponse() and
refresh() behavior is unchanged.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 3
♻️ Duplicate comments (1)
packages/traceloop-sdk/src/lib/client/dataset/datasets.ts (1)
24-31: URL-encode slug in GET path to avoid malformed requestsSlugs with spaces or special chars will break the path; encode to be safe.
- const response = await this.client.get(`/v2/datasets/${slug}`); + const response = await this.client.get( + `/v2/datasets/${encodeURIComponent(slug)}` + );
🧹 Nitpick comments (2)
packages/traceloop-sdk/src/lib/client/dataset/datasets.ts (2)
24-31: Optional: factor out a private path builder for slugged endpointsAvoid duplicating slug path construction and centralize encoding in one place.
For example:
export class Datasets extends BaseDataset { + private datasetPath(slug: string) { + return `/v2/datasets/${encodeURIComponent(slug)}`; + } @@ - const response = await this.client.get(`/v2/datasets/${slug}`); + const response = await this.client.get(this.datasetPath(slug)); @@ - const response = await this.client.delete(`/v2/datasets/${slug}`); + const response = await this.client.delete(this.datasetPath(slug));Also applies to: 69-74
10-75: Nit: add TSDoc to public SDK methodsPublic SDK surface benefits from brief TSDoc for better DX and typed hints in editors.
Example for create():
/** * Create a dataset. * @param options - Dataset metadata; name is required, slug optional. * @returns A Dataset instance wrapping the created dataset. * @throws Error when validation fails or API returns a non-2xx response. */
📜 Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
Plan: Pro
📒 Files selected for processing (2)
packages/traceloop-sdk/src/lib/client/dataset/datasets.ts(1 hunks)packages/traceloop-sdk/test/datasets-comprehensive.test.ts(1 hunks)
🚧 Files skipped from review as they are similar to previous changes (1)
- packages/traceloop-sdk/test/datasets-comprehensive.test.ts
🧰 Additional context used
🧬 Code Graph Analysis (1)
packages/traceloop-sdk/src/lib/client/dataset/datasets.ts (3)
packages/traceloop-sdk/src/lib/client/traceloop-client.ts (1)
TraceloopClient(19-85)packages/traceloop-sdk/src/lib/interfaces/dataset.interface.ts (3)
DatasetCreateOptions(1-5)DatasetResponse(12-23)DatasetListResponse(65-68)packages/traceloop-sdk/src/lib/client/dataset/dataset.ts (3)
Dataset(16-424)slug(28-30)name(32-34)
🔇 Additional comments (3)
packages/traceloop-sdk/src/lib/client/dataset/datasets.ts (3)
10-14: LGTM: Solid class surface and constructionClass extends BaseDataset cleanly and wires the client as expected. No issues spotted here.
37-42: LGTM: Defensive null-check prevents TypeError on empty responsesThanks for addressing the earlier CI failure; this guards against null/undefined API responses.
54-67: LGTM: findByName validates, encodes query, and handles empty resultsValidation and null checks look correct; encoding the name query param is spot-on.
| async create(options: DatasetCreateOptions): Promise<Dataset> { | ||
| this.validateDatasetName(options.name); | ||
|
|
||
| const response = await this.client.post("/v2/datasets", options); | ||
| const data: DatasetResponse = await this.handleResponse(response); | ||
|
|
||
| return new Dataset(this.client, data); | ||
| } |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
🛠️ Refactor suggestion
Validate optional slug on create()
If callers pass a custom slug in options, we should validate it as well to fail fast on the client side.
Apply this diff:
async create(options: DatasetCreateOptions): Promise<Dataset> {
this.validateDatasetName(options.name);
+ if (options.slug) {
+ this.validateDatasetSlug(options.slug);
+ }
const response = await this.client.post("/v2/datasets", options);
const data: DatasetResponse = await this.handleResponse(response);
return new Dataset(this.client, data);
}📝 Committable suggestion
‼️ IMPORTANT
Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.
| async create(options: DatasetCreateOptions): Promise<Dataset> { | |
| this.validateDatasetName(options.name); | |
| const response = await this.client.post("/v2/datasets", options); | |
| const data: DatasetResponse = await this.handleResponse(response); | |
| return new Dataset(this.client, data); | |
| } | |
| async create(options: DatasetCreateOptions): Promise<Dataset> { | |
| this.validateDatasetName(options.name); | |
| if (options.slug) { | |
| this.validateDatasetSlug(options.slug); | |
| } | |
| const response = await this.client.post("/v2/datasets", options); | |
| const data: DatasetResponse = await this.handleResponse(response); | |
| return new Dataset(this.client, data); | |
| } |
🤖 Prompt for AI Agents
In packages/traceloop-sdk/src/lib/client/dataset/datasets.ts around lines 15 to
22, the create() method currently validates only options.name; update it to also
validate an optional slug when provided by calling the same validation routine
(or a new validateSlug function) before making the POST request so the client
fails fast on bad slugs; specifically, check if options.slug exists and run the
appropriate validation method (reuse validateDatasetName if rules are identical)
prior to this.client.post("/v2/datasets", options).
| async list(): Promise<DatasetListResponse> { | ||
| const response = await this.client.get(`/v2/datasets`); | ||
| const data: DatasetListResponse = await this.handleResponse(response); | ||
|
|
||
| if (!data || !data.datasets) { | ||
| return { | ||
| datasets: [], | ||
| total: 0, | ||
| }; | ||
| } | ||
|
|
||
| const datasets = data.datasets.map( | ||
| (datasetData) => new Dataset(this.client, datasetData), | ||
| ); | ||
|
|
||
| return { | ||
| ...data, | ||
| datasets, | ||
| }; | ||
| } |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
🛠️ Refactor suggestion
list() return type mismatch: returning Dataset instances under DatasetListResponse
The method returns Dataset objects, but the declared return type (DatasetListResponse) specifies DatasetResponse[]. This breaks type safety and can confuse consumers.
Two possible fixes (pick one):
- Option A (preferred): Change return type to reflect Dataset instances and return only expected fields.
- async list(): Promise<DatasetListResponse> {
+ async list(): Promise<{ datasets: Dataset[]; total: number }> {
const response = await this.client.get(`/v2/datasets`);
const data: DatasetListResponse = await this.handleResponse(response);
if (!data || !data.datasets) {
return {
datasets: [],
total: 0,
};
}
const datasets = data.datasets.map(
(datasetData) => new Dataset(this.client, datasetData),
);
- return {
- ...data,
- datasets,
- };
+ return {
+ datasets,
+ total: data.total ?? datasets.length,
+ };
}- Option B: Keep the return type as DatasetListResponse and stop wrapping to Dataset instances (return raw responses). Add a separate method (e.g., listInstances) that returns Dataset[] if needed.
Let me know which path you prefer; I can follow up with a patch across call sites/tests if we change the signature.
📝 Committable suggestion
‼️ IMPORTANT
Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.
| async list(): Promise<DatasetListResponse> { | |
| const response = await this.client.get(`/v2/datasets`); | |
| const data: DatasetListResponse = await this.handleResponse(response); | |
| if (!data || !data.datasets) { | |
| return { | |
| datasets: [], | |
| total: 0, | |
| }; | |
| } | |
| const datasets = data.datasets.map( | |
| (datasetData) => new Dataset(this.client, datasetData), | |
| ); | |
| return { | |
| ...data, | |
| datasets, | |
| }; | |
| } | |
| async list(): Promise<{ datasets: Dataset[]; total: number }> { | |
| const response = await this.client.get(`/v2/datasets`); | |
| const data: DatasetListResponse = await this.handleResponse(response); | |
| if (!data || !data.datasets) { | |
| return { | |
| datasets: [], | |
| total: 0, | |
| }; | |
| } | |
| const datasets = data.datasets.map( | |
| (datasetData) => new Dataset(this.client, datasetData), | |
| ); | |
| return { | |
| datasets, | |
| total: data.total ?? datasets.length, | |
| }; | |
| } |
| async delete(slug: string): Promise<void> { | ||
| this.validateDatasetSlug(slug); | ||
|
|
||
| const response = await this.client.delete(`/v2/datasets/${slug}`); | ||
| await this.handleResponse(response); | ||
| } |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
💡 Verification agent
🧩 Analysis chain
URL-encode slug in DELETE path + verify 204 handling in handleResponse
- Encode slug to avoid path issues.
- If the API returns 204 No Content for deletes, ensure handleResponse doesn’t attempt to parse JSON, or this will throw.
Apply this diff for the path:
- const response = await this.client.delete(`/v2/datasets/${slug}`);
+ const response = await this.client.delete(
+ `/v2/datasets/${encodeURIComponent(slug)}`
+ );
await this.handleResponse(response);To verify 204 handling, run:
🏁 Script executed:
#!/bin/bash
# Show handleResponse implementation
rg -n "class BaseDataset" -A 200 packages/traceloop-sdk/src/lib/client/dataset/base-dataset.ts
echo "----"
rg -n "handleResponse\\(" -A 40 packages/traceloop-sdk/src/lib/client/dataset/base-dataset.ts
echo "---- Check for 204 handling ----"
rg -n "204|No Content|response\\.status" packages/traceloop-sdk/src/lib/client/dataset/base-dataset.tsLength of output: 3748
Encode dataset slug in DELETE path
- In
packages/traceloop-sdk/src/lib/client/dataset/datasets.ts(around lines 69–74), wrapslugwithencodeURIComponentto prevent path‐encoding issues. - Verified that
handleResponseonly callsresponse.json()whenContent-Typeincludes “application/json”. A 204 No Content response (which typically omits that header) will bypass JSON parsing and returnnullsafely—no changes needed for 204 handling.
Apply this diff:
--- a/packages/traceloop-sdk/src/lib/client/dataset/datasets.ts
+++ b/packages/traceloop-sdk/src/lib/client/dataset/datasets.ts
@@ async delete(slug: string): Promise<void> {
- const response = await this.client.delete(`/v2/datasets/${slug}`);
+ const response = await this.client.delete(
+ `/v2/datasets/${encodeURIComponent(slug)}`
+ );
await this.handleResponse(response);
}📝 Committable suggestion
‼️ IMPORTANT
Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.
| async delete(slug: string): Promise<void> { | |
| this.validateDatasetSlug(slug); | |
| const response = await this.client.delete(`/v2/datasets/${slug}`); | |
| await this.handleResponse(response); | |
| } | |
| async delete(slug: string): Promise<void> { | |
| this.validateDatasetSlug(slug); | |
| const response = await this.client.delete( | |
| `/v2/datasets/${encodeURIComponent(slug)}` | |
| ); | |
| await this.handleResponse(response); | |
| } |
🤖 Prompt for AI Agents
In packages/traceloop-sdk/src/lib/client/dataset/datasets.ts around lines 69 to
74, the DELETE request uses the raw slug in the URL which can break for special
characters; update the request path to use encodeURIComponent(slug) when
constructing `/v2/datasets/${slug}` so the slug is properly percent-encoded
before calling this.client.delete. No other changes are required for 204
handling.
… enhance dataset deletion; remove findByName method from Datasets class
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Caution
Changes requested ❌
Reviewed 46b7e12 in 1 minute and 21 seconds. Click for details.
- Reviewed
1797lines of code in4files - Skipped
0files when reviewing. - Skipped posting
2draft comments. View those below. - Modify your settings and rules to customize what types of comments Ellipsis leaves. And don't forget to react with 👍 or 👎 to teach Ellipsis.
1. packages/traceloop-sdk/test/datasets-final.test.ts:41
- Draft comment:
The test expects a getVersionCSV method, but it isn’t visible in the dataset client implementation. Verify if getVersionCSV is implemented or update the test if it’s not required. - Reason this comment was not posted:
Comment was not on a location in the diff, so it can't be submitted as a review comment.
2. packages/traceloop-sdk/test/datasets-comprehensive.test.ts:777
- Draft comment:
Properly validating invalid column data is good. Ensure that error messages from addColumn match expected output for consistency in client validation. - Reason this comment was not posted:
Comment did not seem useful. Confidence is useful =0%<= threshold50%The comment is asking the author to ensure that error messages match expected output, which is a form of asking for confirmation or verification. This violates the rule against asking the author to ensure behavior is intended or tested.
Workflow ID: wflow_msIKhu4qOuIKVbBN
You can customize
|
|
||
| const results: ColumnResponse[] = []; | ||
|
|
||
| for (const column of columns) { |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Consider using Promise.all to parallelize column creation in addColumn for potential performance gains.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 9
♻️ Duplicate comments (13)
packages/traceloop-sdk/src/lib/client/dataset/datasets.ts (4)
24-31: Encode dataset slug to prevent path issues.The GET request uses the raw slug in the URL which can break for special characters. This issue was previously identified and remains unaddressed.
Apply this fix:
- const response = await this.client.get(`/v2/datasets/${slug}`); + const response = await this.client.get( + `/v2/datasets/${encodeURIComponent(slug)}` + );
15-22: Validate optional slug parameter.If callers pass a custom slug in options, it should be validated to fail fast on the client side.
Apply this fix:
async create(options: DatasetCreateOptions): Promise<Dataset> { this.validateDatasetName(options.name); + if (options.slug) { + this.validateDatasetSlug(options.slug); + } const response = await this.client.post("/v2/datasets", options); const data: DatasetResponse = await this.handleResponse(response); return new Dataset(this.client, data); }
33-52: Fix return type mismatch in list method.The method returns Dataset instances but the declared return type expects DatasetResponse[]. This breaks type safety.
Apply this fix:
- async list(): Promise<DatasetListResponse> { + async list(): Promise<{ datasets: Dataset[]; total: number }> { const response = await this.client.get(`/v2/datasets`); const data: DatasetListResponse = await this.handleResponse(response); if (!data || !data.datasets) { return { datasets: [], total: 0, }; } const datasets = data.datasets.map( (datasetData) => new Dataset(this.client, datasetData), ); - return { - ...data, - datasets, - }; + return { + datasets, + total: data.total ?? datasets.length, + }; }
54-59: Encode dataset slug in DELETE path.The DELETE request uses the raw slug which can break for special characters.
Apply this fix:
- const response = await this.client.delete(`/v2/datasets/${slug}`); + const response = await this.client.delete( + `/v2/datasets/${encodeURIComponent(slug)}` + );packages/traceloop-sdk/src/lib/client/dataset/dataset.ts (9)
112-128: Fix property name inconsistency in ColumnResponse.The ColumnResponse interface expects camelCase properties but the method returns snake_case properties.
Apply this fix:
const columnResponse: ColumnResponse = { slug: data.slug, datasetId: this._data.id, datasetSlug: this._data.slug, name: data.name, type: data.type, required: data.required, description: data.description, - created_at: data.created_at, - updated_at: data.updated_at, + createdAt: data.created_at || data.createdAt || new Date().toISOString(), + updatedAt: data.updated_at || data.updatedAt || new Date().toISOString(), };
130-131: Avoid unconditional refresh in getColumns.The method always calls refresh causing unnecessary network overhead. Only refresh when columns are missing.
Apply this fix:
async getColumns(): Promise<ColumnResponse[]> { - await this.refresh(); + if (!(this._data as any).columns) { + await this.refresh(); + }
142-153: Fix timestamp inconsistency and property naming in getColumns.The method uses dataset timestamps instead of column-specific timestamps and returns snake_case properties.
Apply this fix:
columns.push({ slug: columnSlug, datasetId: this._data.id, datasetSlug: this._data.slug, name: col.name, type: col.type, required: col.required === true, description: col.description, - created_at: this.createdAt, - updated_at: this.updatedAt, + createdAt: col.created_at || col.createdAt || this.createdAt, + updatedAt: col.updated_at || col.updatedAt || this.updatedAt, });
178-190: Support inputs keyed by either column names or slugs.The transformation only maps by column names and drops rows already keyed by slugs.
Apply this fix:
columns.forEach((col) => { columnMap.set(col.name, col.slug); }); + const slugSet = new Set(columns.map((c) => c.slug)); const transformedRows = rows.map((row) => { const transformedRow: { [key: string]: any } = {}; - Object.keys(row).forEach((columnName) => { - const columnSlug = columnMap.get(columnName); - if (columnSlug) { - transformedRow[columnSlug] = row[columnName]; - } - }); + Object.keys(row).forEach((key) => { + const columnSlug = columnMap.get(key); + if (columnSlug) { + transformedRow[columnSlug] = (row as any)[key]; + } else if (slugSet.has(key)) { + transformedRow[key] = (row as any)[key]; + } + }); return transformedRow; });
192-194: Fix payload property casing.The payload uses PascalCase "Rows" but the API expects camelCase "rows".
Apply this fix:
const payload = { - Rows: transformedRows, + rows: transformedRows, };
203-210: Fix property naming inconsistency in addRows response.The response mapping uses snake_case properties but the interface expects camelCase.
Apply this fix:
return result.rows.map((row: any) => ({ id: row.id, datasetId: this._data.id, datasetSlug: this._data.slug, data: this.transformValuesBackToNames(row.values, columnMap), - created_at: row.created_at, - updated_at: row.updated_at, + createdAt: row.created_at || row.createdAt || "", + updatedAt: row.updated_at || row.updatedAt || "", }));
244-251: Transform getRows response for consistency and fix property naming.The getRows method should map to RowResponse format and transform values back to column names for consistency.
Apply this fix:
const rows = data.rows || []; + if (rows.length === 0) return []; + + const columns = await this.getColumns(); + const columnMap = new Map<string, string>(); + columns.forEach((col) => columnMap.set(col.name, col.slug)); + return rows.map((row: any) => ({ id: row.id, datasetId: this._data.id, datasetSlug: this._data.slug, - data: row.values || row.data || {}, - created_at: row.created_at, - updated_at: row.updated_at, + data: this.transformValuesBackToNames(row.values ?? row.data ?? {}, columnMap), + createdAt: row.created_at || row.createdAt || "", + updatedAt: row.updated_at || row.updatedAt || "", }));
270-274: Optimize CSV import by precomputing column map.The batch CSV import recomputes the column map for every addRows call causing N+1 GETs.
Apply this fix by first adding a helper method:
+ private async addRowsWithColumnMap( + rows: RowData[], + columnMap: Map<string, string> + ): Promise<RowResponse[]> { + const slugSet = new Set(columnMap.values()); + const transformedRows = rows.map((row) => { + const out: Record<string, any> = {}; + for (const [key, value] of Object.entries(row)) { + const slug = columnMap.get(key); + if (slug) { + out[slug] = value; + } else if (slugSet.has(key)) { + out[key] = value; + } + } + return out; + }); + + const payload = { rows: transformedRows }; + const response = await this.client.post(`/v2/datasets/${encodeURIComponent(this.slug)}/rows`, payload); + const result = await this.handleResponse(response); + + if (!result.rows) return []; + return result.rows.map((row: any) => ({ + id: row.id, + datasetId: this._data.id, + datasetSlug: this._data.slug, + data: this.transformValuesBackToNames(row.values ?? row.data ?? {}, columnMap), + createdAt: row.createdAt || row.created_at || "", + updatedAt: row.updatedAt || row.updated_at || "", + })); + }Then update the batching logic:
+ const cols = await this.getColumns(); + const columnMap = new Map<string, string>(cols.map((c) => [c.name, c.slug])); + const batchSize = 100; for (let i = 0; i < rows.length; i += batchSize) { const batch = rows.slice(i, i + batchSize); - await this.addRows(batch); + await this.addRowsWithColumnMap(batch, columnMap); }
331-351: Replace custom CSV parsing with robust library.The custom CSV parsing implementation may not handle edge cases like embedded newlines, escaped quotes, or complex quoting scenarios correctly. Consider using a robust CSV parsing library for production use.
📜 Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
Plan: Pro
📒 Files selected for processing (5)
packages/traceloop-sdk/recordings/Dataset-API-Comprehensive-Tests_1618738334/recording.har(1 hunks)packages/traceloop-sdk/src/lib/client/dataset/dataset.ts(1 hunks)packages/traceloop-sdk/src/lib/client/dataset/datasets.ts(1 hunks)packages/traceloop-sdk/test/datasets-comprehensive.test.ts(1 hunks)packages/traceloop-sdk/test/datasets-final.test.ts(1 hunks)
✅ Files skipped from review due to trivial changes (1)
- packages/traceloop-sdk/recordings/Dataset-API-Comprehensive-Tests_1618738334/recording.har
🚧 Files skipped from review as they are similar to previous changes (2)
- packages/traceloop-sdk/test/datasets-final.test.ts
- packages/traceloop-sdk/test/datasets-comprehensive.test.ts
🧰 Additional context used
🧬 Code Graph Analysis (2)
packages/traceloop-sdk/src/lib/client/dataset/datasets.ts (5)
packages/traceloop-sdk/src/lib/client/traceloop-client.ts (1)
TraceloopClient(19-85)packages/traceloop-sdk/src/lib/interfaces/dataset.interface.ts (3)
DatasetCreateOptions(1-5)DatasetResponse(12-23)DatasetListResponse(65-68)packages/traceloop-sdk/src/lib/client/dataset/dataset.ts (3)
Dataset(16-373)slug(28-30)version(40-42)packages/traceloop-sdk/src/lib/client/dataset/row.ts (1)
data(25-27)packages/traceloop-sdk/src/lib/client/dataset/column.ts (1)
slug(13-15)
packages/traceloop-sdk/src/lib/client/dataset/dataset.ts (6)
packages/traceloop-sdk/src/lib/node-server-sdk.ts (4)
Dataset(22-22)DatasetResponse(8-8)TraceloopClient(21-21)ColumnResponse(10-10)packages/traceloop-sdk/src/lib/client/dataset/index.ts (2)
Dataset(2-2)BaseDataset(1-1)packages/traceloop-sdk/src/lib/interfaces/dataset.interface.ts (2)
DatasetResponse(12-23)ColumnResponse(33-39)packages/traceloop-sdk/src/lib/client/traceloop-client.ts (1)
TraceloopClient(19-85)packages/traceloop-sdk/src/lib/client/dataset/row.ts (1)
data(25-27)packages/traceloop-sdk/src/lib/client/dataset/column.ts (1)
slug(13-15)
🪛 GitHub Actions: CI
packages/traceloop-sdk/src/lib/client/dataset/datasets.ts
[warning] Prettier formatting issues detected. Run 'pnpm prettier --write' to fix.
packages/traceloop-sdk/src/lib/client/dataset/dataset.ts
[warning] Prettier formatting issues detected. Run 'pnpm prettier --write' to fix.
| async refresh(): Promise<void> { | ||
| const response = await this.client.get(`/v2/datasets/${this.slug}`); | ||
| const data = await this.handleResponse(response); | ||
| this._data = data; | ||
| } |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Encode dataset slug in refresh method.
The refresh method uses the raw slug in the URL path without encoding, potentially causing issues with special characters.
Apply this fix:
- const response = await this.client.get(`/v2/datasets/${this.slug}`);
+ const response = await this.client.get(`/v2/datasets/${encodeURIComponent(this.slug)}`);📝 Committable suggestion
‼️ IMPORTANT
Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.
| async refresh(): Promise<void> { | |
| const response = await this.client.get(`/v2/datasets/${this.slug}`); | |
| const data = await this.handleResponse(response); | |
| this._data = data; | |
| } | |
| async refresh(): Promise<void> { | |
| const response = await this.client.get( | |
| `/v2/datasets/${encodeURIComponent(this.slug)}` | |
| ); | |
| const data = await this.handleResponse(response); | |
| this._data = data; | |
| } |
🧰 Tools
🪛 GitHub Actions: CI
[warning] Prettier formatting issues detected. Run 'pnpm prettier --write' to fix.
🤖 Prompt for AI Agents
In packages/traceloop-sdk/src/lib/client/dataset/dataset.ts around lines 56 to
60, the refresh method builds the request path using the raw slug which can
break with special characters; update the request to URL-encode the slug (e.g.
use encodeURIComponent(this.slug) when constructing the `/v2/datasets/...` path)
so the GET call uses an encoded slug, then proceed to handle the response and
assign this._data as before.
| const response = await this.client.put( | ||
| `/v2/datasets/${this.slug}`, | ||
| options, | ||
| ); |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Encode dataset slug in update method.
The update method uses the raw slug in the URL path without encoding.
Apply this fix:
const response = await this.client.put(
- `/v2/datasets/${this.slug}`,
+ `/v2/datasets/${encodeURIComponent(this.slug)}`,
options,
);📝 Committable suggestion
‼️ IMPORTANT
Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.
| const response = await this.client.put( | |
| `/v2/datasets/${this.slug}`, | |
| options, | |
| ); | |
| const response = await this.client.put( | |
| `/v2/datasets/${encodeURIComponent(this.slug)}`, | |
| options, | |
| ); |
🧰 Tools
🪛 GitHub Actions: CI
[warning] Prettier formatting issues detected. Run 'pnpm prettier --write' to fix.
🤖 Prompt for AI Agents
In packages/traceloop-sdk/src/lib/client/dataset/dataset.ts around lines 67 to
70, the update method constructs the request path using the raw dataset slug
which can break URLs for slugs containing special characters; replace the usage
of this.slug in the path with an encoded slug (e.g.,
encodeURIComponent(this.slug)) so the PUT request URL is safely encoded before
calling this.client.put, and ensure any other dynamic path segments in this
method follow the same encoding convention.
| async delete(): Promise<void> { | ||
| const response = await this.client.delete(`/v2/datasets/${this.slug}`); | ||
| await this.handleResponse(response); | ||
| } |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Encode dataset slug in delete method.
The delete method uses the raw slug in the URL path without encoding.
Apply this fix:
- const response = await this.client.delete(`/v2/datasets/${this.slug}`);
+ const response = await this.client.delete(`/v2/datasets/${encodeURIComponent(this.slug)}`);📝 Committable suggestion
‼️ IMPORTANT
Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.
| async delete(): Promise<void> { | |
| const response = await this.client.delete(`/v2/datasets/${this.slug}`); | |
| await this.handleResponse(response); | |
| } | |
| async delete(): Promise<void> { | |
| const response = await this.client.delete(`/v2/datasets/${encodeURIComponent(this.slug)}`); | |
| await this.handleResponse(response); | |
| } |
🧰 Tools
🪛 GitHub Actions: CI
[warning] Prettier formatting issues detected. Run 'pnpm prettier --write' to fix.
🤖 Prompt for AI Agents
In packages/traceloop-sdk/src/lib/client/dataset/dataset.ts around lines 76 to
79, the delete method builds the request URL using the raw slug which can break
for slugs containing reserved characters; update the URL construction to use an
encoded slug (e.g., encodeURIComponent(this.slug)) so the slug is safely
percent-encoded before appending to `/v2/datasets/`, and keep the rest of the
call and response handling unchanged.
| const response = await this.client.post( | ||
| `/v2/datasets/${this.slug}/publish`, | ||
| options, | ||
| ); |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Encode dataset slug in publish method.
The publish method uses the raw slug in the URL path without encoding.
Apply this fix:
const response = await this.client.post(
- `/v2/datasets/${this.slug}/publish`,
+ `/v2/datasets/${encodeURIComponent(this.slug)}/publish`,
options,
);📝 Committable suggestion
‼️ IMPORTANT
Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.
| const response = await this.client.post( | |
| `/v2/datasets/${this.slug}/publish`, | |
| options, | |
| ); | |
| const response = await this.client.post( | |
| `/v2/datasets/${encodeURIComponent(this.slug)}/publish`, | |
| options, | |
| ); |
🧰 Tools
🪛 GitHub Actions: CI
[warning] Prettier formatting issues detected. Run 'pnpm prettier --write' to fix.
🤖 Prompt for AI Agents
In packages/traceloop-sdk/src/lib/client/dataset/dataset.ts around lines 82 to
85, the publish method interpolates the dataset slug directly into the request
path which can break for slugs with special characters; update the path to use
an encoded slug (e.g., replace this.slug with encodeURIComponent(this.slug)) so
the URL is safe, and ensure tests or call sites expecting the previous behavior
still pass.
| const response = await this.client.post( | ||
| `/v2/datasets/${this.slug}/columns`, | ||
| column, | ||
| ); |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Encode dataset slug in addColumn method.
The addColumn method uses the raw slug in the URL path without encoding.
Apply this fix:
const response = await this.client.post(
- `/v2/datasets/${this.slug}/columns`,
+ `/v2/datasets/${encodeURIComponent(this.slug)}/columns`,
column,
);📝 Committable suggestion
‼️ IMPORTANT
Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.
| const response = await this.client.post( | |
| `/v2/datasets/${this.slug}/columns`, | |
| column, | |
| ); | |
| const response = await this.client.post( | |
| `/v2/datasets/${encodeURIComponent(this.slug)}/columns`, | |
| column, | |
| ); |
🧰 Tools
🪛 GitHub Actions: CI
[warning] Prettier formatting issues detected. Run 'pnpm prettier --write' to fix.
🤖 Prompt for AI Agents
In packages/traceloop-sdk/src/lib/client/dataset/dataset.ts around lines 102 to
105, the addColumn method is building the request path with the raw dataset slug
which can break URLs; update the path to use an encoded slug (e.g., replace
this.slug with an encoded form such as encodeURIComponent(this.slug) or
equivalent) so the slug is URL-safe before calling this.client.post, keeping the
rest of the call unchanged.
| const response = await this.client.post( | ||
| `/v2/datasets/${this.slug}/rows`, | ||
| payload, | ||
| ); |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Encode dataset slug in addRows method.
The addRows method uses the raw slug in the URL path without encoding.
Apply this fix:
const response = await this.client.post(
- `/v2/datasets/${this.slug}/rows`,
+ `/v2/datasets/${encodeURIComponent(this.slug)}/rows`,
payload,
);📝 Committable suggestion
‼️ IMPORTANT
Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.
| const response = await this.client.post( | |
| `/v2/datasets/${this.slug}/rows`, | |
| payload, | |
| ); | |
| const response = await this.client.post( | |
| `/v2/datasets/${encodeURIComponent(this.slug)}/rows`, | |
| payload, | |
| ); |
🧰 Tools
🪛 GitHub Actions: CI
[warning] Prettier formatting issues detected. Run 'pnpm prettier --write' to fix.
🤖 Prompt for AI Agents
In packages/traceloop-sdk/src/lib/client/dataset/dataset.ts around lines 196 to
199, the addRows method interpolates the dataset slug directly into the request
path which can break for slugs with special characters; replace the raw slug
with an encoded slug (use encodeURIComponent(this.slug)) when building the URL
(e.g., `/v2/datasets/${encodeURIComponent(this.slug)}/rows`) to ensure the path
segment is safely escaped and avoid double-encoding if the slug is already
encoded.
| const response = await this.client.get( | ||
| `/v2/datasets/${this.slug}/rows?limit=${limit}&offset=${offset}`, | ||
| ); |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Encode dataset slug in getRows method.
The getRows method uses the raw slug in the URL path without encoding.
Apply this fix:
const response = await this.client.get(
- `/v2/datasets/${this.slug}/rows?limit=${limit}&offset=${offset}`,
+ `/v2/datasets/${encodeURIComponent(this.slug)}/rows?limit=${limit}&offset=${offset}`,
);📝 Committable suggestion
‼️ IMPORTANT
Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.
| const response = await this.client.get( | |
| `/v2/datasets/${this.slug}/rows?limit=${limit}&offset=${offset}`, | |
| ); | |
| const response = await this.client.get( | |
| `/v2/datasets/${encodeURIComponent(this.slug)}/rows?limit=${limit}&offset=${offset}`, | |
| ); |
🧰 Tools
🪛 GitHub Actions: CI
[warning] Prettier formatting issues detected. Run 'pnpm prettier --write' to fix.
🤖 Prompt for AI Agents
In packages/traceloop-sdk/src/lib/client/dataset/dataset.ts around lines 238 to
240, the getRows method interpolates the raw dataset slug into the URL which can
break for slugs containing special characters; update the code to URL-encode the
slug before building the path (e.g. use encodeURIComponent(this.slug) when
constructing the `/v2/datasets/.../rows` path) so the request URL is valid and
safe.
| const response = await this.client.get( | ||
| `/v2/datasets/${this.slug}/versions`, | ||
| ); | ||
| return await this.handleResponse(response); |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Encode dataset slug in getVersions method.
The getVersions method uses the raw slug in the URL path without encoding.
Apply this fix:
const response = await this.client.get(
- `/v2/datasets/${this.slug}/versions`,
+ `/v2/datasets/${encodeURIComponent(this.slug)}/versions`,
);📝 Committable suggestion
‼️ IMPORTANT
Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.
| const response = await this.client.get( | |
| `/v2/datasets/${this.slug}/versions`, | |
| ); | |
| return await this.handleResponse(response); | |
| const response = await this.client.get( | |
| `/v2/datasets/${encodeURIComponent(this.slug)}/versions`, | |
| ); | |
| return await this.handleResponse(response); |
🧰 Tools
🪛 GitHub Actions: CI
[warning] Prettier formatting issues detected. Run 'pnpm prettier --write' to fix.
🤖 Prompt for AI Agents
In packages/traceloop-sdk/src/lib/client/dataset/dataset.ts around lines 278 to
281, the getVersions method inserts the raw dataset slug into the URL path which
can break for slugs containing special characters; update the request to
URL-encode the slug (use encodeURIComponent(this.slug)) when building the path
so the HTTP GET uses a safe encoded slug before calling handleResponse.
| async getVersionCSV(slug: string, version: string): Promise<string> { | ||
| this.validateDatasetSlug(slug); | ||
|
|
||
| if (!version || typeof version !== "string") { | ||
| throw new Error("Version must be a non-empty string"); | ||
| } | ||
|
|
||
| const response = await this.client.get(`/v2/datasets/${slug}/versions/${version}`); | ||
| const csvData = await this.handleResponse(response); | ||
|
|
||
| if (typeof csvData !== "string") { | ||
| throw new Error("Expected CSV data as string from API"); | ||
| } | ||
|
|
||
| return csvData; | ||
| } |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Encode slugs in getVersionCSV path.
The method uses raw slug and version parameters in the URL path without encoding, which can cause issues with special characters.
Apply this fix:
- const response = await this.client.get(`/v2/datasets/${slug}/versions/${version}`);
+ const response = await this.client.get(
+ `/v2/datasets/${encodeURIComponent(slug)}/versions/${encodeURIComponent(version)}`
+ );📝 Committable suggestion
‼️ IMPORTANT
Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.
| async getVersionCSV(slug: string, version: string): Promise<string> { | |
| this.validateDatasetSlug(slug); | |
| if (!version || typeof version !== "string") { | |
| throw new Error("Version must be a non-empty string"); | |
| } | |
| const response = await this.client.get(`/v2/datasets/${slug}/versions/${version}`); | |
| const csvData = await this.handleResponse(response); | |
| if (typeof csvData !== "string") { | |
| throw new Error("Expected CSV data as string from API"); | |
| } | |
| return csvData; | |
| } | |
| async getVersionCSV(slug: string, version: string): Promise<string> { | |
| this.validateDatasetSlug(slug); | |
| if (!version || typeof version !== "string") { | |
| throw new Error("Version must be a non-empty string"); | |
| } | |
| const response = await this.client.get( | |
| `/v2/datasets/${encodeURIComponent(slug)}/versions/${encodeURIComponent(version)}` | |
| ); | |
| const csvData = await this.handleResponse(response); | |
| if (typeof csvData !== "string") { | |
| throw new Error("Expected CSV data as string from API"); | |
| } | |
| return csvData; | |
| } |
🧰 Tools
🪛 GitHub Actions: CI
[warning] Prettier formatting issues detected. Run 'pnpm prettier --write' to fix.
🤖 Prompt for AI Agents
In packages/traceloop-sdk/src/lib/client/dataset/datasets.ts around lines 61 to
76, the URL path is built using raw slug and version which can break for special
characters; encode both values before inserting them into the path (e.g., use
encodeURIComponent on slug and on version) so the request URL is safe; keep the
existing validateDatasetSlug call, but apply encoding when constructing the
`/v2/datasets/{slug}/versions/{version}` path, and ensure the encoded strings
are used in the client.get call.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Important
Looks good to me! 👍
Reviewed 36b89a6 in 50 seconds. Click for details.
- Reviewed
49lines of code in3files - Skipped
0files when reviewing. - Skipped posting
3draft comments. View those below. - Modify your settings and rules to customize what types of comments Ellipsis leaves. And don't forget to react with 👍 or 👎 to teach Ellipsis.
1. packages/traceloop-sdk/src/lib/client/dataset/dataset.ts:95
- Draft comment:
This change only removes an extraneous whitespace line. It doesn't affect logic; ensure consistent formatting across the file. - Reason this comment was not posted:
Confidence changes required:0%<= threshold50%None
2. packages/traceloop-sdk/src/lib/client/dataset/datasets.ts:68
- Draft comment:
Reformatting the GET call into a multi-line string improves readability without changing semantics. - Reason this comment was not posted:
Confidence changes required:0%<= threshold50%None
3. packages/traceloop-sdk/test/datasets-comprehensive.test.ts:777
- Draft comment:
The multi-line formatting of the array literal in addColumn enhances clarity and maintains functionality. - Reason this comment was not posted:
Confidence changes required:0%<= threshold50%None
Workflow ID: wflow_8foF6eNDQEosgqDj
You can customize
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Caution
Changes requested ❌
Reviewed 7702f40 in 1 minute and 52 seconds. Click for details.
- Reviewed
321lines of code in2files - Skipped
0files when reviewing. - Skipped posting
7draft comments. View those below. - Modify your settings and rules to customize what types of comments Ellipsis leaves. And don't forget to react with 👍 or 👎 to teach Ellipsis.
1. packages/sample-app/src/sample_dataset.ts:38
- Draft comment:
Batch addition: Converting multiple addColumn calls into one call with an array is concise. Ensure that the addColumn API accepts an array overload and validates all column specs. - Reason this comment was not posted:
Confidence changes required:33%<= threshold50%None
2. packages/sample-app/src/sample_dataset.ts:282
- Draft comment:
Dataset retrieval: Using client.datasets.get(dataset.slug) instead of findByName improves lookup precision. Verify that the slug is always generated and unique. - Reason this comment was not posted:
Comment looked like it was already resolved.
3. packages/sample-app/src/sample_dataset.ts:8
- Draft comment:
Environment variables: Consider checking that TRACELOOP_API_KEY (and OPENAI_API_KEY) are defined to prevent runtime issues if missing. - Reason this comment was not posted:
Comment was not on a location in the diff, so it can't be submitted as a review comment.
4. packages/sample-app/src/test_dataset_api.ts:57
- Draft comment:
Batch column addition: Refactoring individual addColumn calls into one call with an array is more concise. Ensure the API supports batch schema creation. - Reason this comment was not posted:
Confidence changes required:33%<= threshold50%None
5. packages/sample-app/src/test_dataset_api.ts:155
- Draft comment:
Dataset info retrieval: Switching from getStats() to using getRows() and getColumns() is consistent, but be cautious about potential performance issues for large datasets. - Reason this comment was not posted:
Comment looked like it was already resolved.
6. packages/sample-app/src/test_dataset_api.ts:208
- Draft comment:
Dataset retrieval by slug: Updating retrieval to use testDataset.slug enhances lookup reliability. Confirm that slug generation is robust and unique. - Reason this comment was not posted:
Comment looked like it was already resolved.
7. packages/sample-app/src/test_dataset_api.ts:221
- Draft comment:
Dataset deletion: Replacing the search-by-name test with a deletion test is acceptable. Note that deletion is irreversible—ensure safeguards exist in production. - Reason this comment was not posted:
Comment did not seem useful. Confidence is useful =0%<= threshold50%The comment is purely informative, reminding the author about the irreversible nature of deletion and suggesting safeguards in production. It doesn't provide a specific code suggestion or ask for a specific test to be written.
Workflow ID: wflow_7rx5KLpDzWV5XgVF
You can customize
| await dataset.fromCSV(csvData, { hasHeader: true }); | ||
| console.log("✅ Imported 3 additional records from CSV\n"); | ||
|
|
||
| // 5. Get dataset info |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Statistics retrieval: Switching from getStats() to deriving stats via getRows() and getColumns() is clear but may impact performance with large datasets. Consider paginating or using a dedicated stats method.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Important
Looks good to me! 👍
Reviewed 1c5af21 in 48 seconds. Click for details.
- Reviewed
26lines of code in2files - Skipped
0files when reviewing. - Skipped posting
2draft comments. View those below. - Modify your settings and rules to customize what types of comments Ellipsis leaves. And don't forget to react with 👍 or 👎 to teach Ellipsis.
1. packages/sample-app/src/sample_dataset.ts:269
- Draft comment:
Changed to unpaginated list call. Ensure this behavior is intended; otherwise, consider pagination for large dataset volumes. - Reason this comment was not posted:
Confidence changes required:33%<= threshold50%None
2. packages/sample-app/src/test_dataset_api.ts:26
- Draft comment:
Updated list call to unpaginated version; verify in tests that handling all datasets is acceptable. - Reason this comment was not posted:
Confidence changes required:33%<= threshold50%None
Workflow ID: wflow_XuiEUdwr0xB2LXye
You can customize
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Important
Looks good to me! 👍
Reviewed c215659 in 1 minute and 31 seconds. Click for details.
- Reviewed
256lines of code in4files - Skipped
0files when reviewing. - Skipped posting
9draft comments. View those below. - Modify your settings and rules to customize what types of comments Ellipsis leaves. And don't forget to react with 👍 or 👎 to teach Ellipsis.
1. packages/sample-app/src/sample_dataset.ts:38
- Draft comment:
Extracting the columns definition into 'columnsToAdd' improves readability and leverages TypeScript's 'as const' for type safety. - Reason this comment was not posted:
Confidence changes required:0%<= threshold50%None
2. packages/sample-app/src/sample_dataset.ts:184
- Draft comment:
Renaming the variable to 'allColumns' makes the intent clear when retrieving dataset schema. - Reason this comment was not posted:
Confidence changes required:0%<= threshold50%None
3. packages/sample-app/src/test_dataset_api.ts:57
- Draft comment:
Extracting the columns array into 'columnsToAdd' enhances clarity and consistency with type annotations. - Reason this comment was not posted:
Confidence changes required:0%<= threshold50%None
4. packages/sample-app/src/test_dataset_api.ts:83
- Draft comment:
Renaming 'columns' to 'allColumns' clarifies its purpose for column retrieval and logging. - Reason this comment was not posted:
Confidence changes required:0%<= threshold50%None
5. packages/sample-app/src/test_dataset_api.ts:222
- Draft comment:
Using the instance method 'delete()' on the dataset (instead of a client deletion call by slug) is more consistent with an object‐oriented API design. - Reason this comment was not posted:
Confidence changes required:0%<= threshold50%None
6. packages/traceloop-sdk/src/lib/tracing/index.ts:31
- Draft comment:
Commenting out the ImageUploader import reflects the API changes correctly. Consider removing unused imports if they're no longer needed. - Reason this comment was not posted:
Confidence changes required:0%<= threshold50%None
7. packages/traceloop-sdk/src/lib/tracing/index.ts:55
- Draft comment:
Disabling the image uploader callback is appropriate given API changes. Review later to remove any dead code if it's not used elsewhere. - Reason this comment was not posted:
Confidence changes required:0%<= threshold50%None
8. packages/traceloop-sdk/src/lib/tracing/index.ts:295
- Draft comment:
Using 'new Resource' instead of 'resourceFromAttributes' aligns with the latest OpenTelemetry practices for resource configuration. - Reason this comment was not posted:
Confidence changes required:0%<= threshold50%None
9. packages/traceloop-sdk/src/lib/tracing/span-processor.ts:169
- Draft comment:
The fallback check using (instrumentationScope?.name || instrumentationLibrary?.name) ensures better compatibility across different versions of instrumentation, which is a robust approach. - Reason this comment was not posted:
Confidence changes required:0%<= threshold50%None
Workflow ID: wflow_mOLoaRoekjpGe2Hz
You can customize
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 1
♻️ Duplicate comments (6)
packages/traceloop-sdk/src/lib/client/dataset/datasets.ts (5)
15-22: Validate optional slug on create()If callers pass options.slug, validate it to fail fast client-side.
async create(options: DatasetCreateOptions): Promise<Dataset> { this.validateDatasetName(options.name); + if (options.slug) { + this.validateDatasetSlug(options.slug); + } const response = await this.client.post("/v2/datasets", options); const data: DatasetResponse = await this.handleResponse(response);
24-31: URL-encode slug in GET pathProtect against spaces/unicode/special chars by encoding the slug in the request path.
- const response = await this.client.get(`/v2/datasets/${slug}`); + const response = await this.client.get( + `/v2/datasets/${encodeURIComponent(slug)}` + );
33-52: Return type mismatch in list(): returning Dataset[] where DatasetListResponse expects DatasetResponse[]The method wraps items into Dataset instances but still declares Promise. This breaks type safety for consumers expecting DTOs.
Option A (recommended): Change the return type to reflect Dataset instances and return only expected fields.
- async list(): Promise<DatasetListResponse> { + async list(): Promise<{ datasets: Dataset[]; total: number }> { const response = await this.client.get(`/v2/datasets`); const data: DatasetListResponse = await this.handleResponse(response); if (!data || !data.datasets) { return { datasets: [], - total: 0, + total: 0, }; } const datasets = data.datasets.map( (datasetData) => new Dataset(this.client, datasetData), ); - return { - ...data, - datasets, - }; + return { + datasets, + total: data.total ?? datasets.length, + }; }Option B: Keep the return type as DatasetListResponse and return raw data without wrapping. If you still want instances, add a separate method (e.g., listInstances): Promise<Dataset[]>.
54-59: URL-encode slug in DELETE pathEncode the slug to prevent path issues on delete as well.
- const response = await this.client.delete(`/v2/datasets/${slug}`); + const response = await this.client.delete( + `/v2/datasets/${encodeURIComponent(slug)}` + );
68-70: Encode slug and version in getVersionCSV pathEncode both path parameters to avoid failures with special characters.
- const response = await this.client.get( - `/v2/datasets/${slug}/versions/${version}`, - ); + const response = await this.client.get( + `/v2/datasets/${encodeURIComponent(slug)}/versions/${encodeURIComponent( + version, + )}`, + );packages/sample-app/src/test_dataset_api.ts (1)
230-249: Consider enhancing error handling and cleanup robustness.While the current error handling is good, the cleanup logic could be more robust to handle partial failures and ensure test environment remains clean.
The previous review comment about adding resource cleanup is still valid. Consider implementing cleanup logic in a finally block or catch block to ensure datasets are removed even if tests fail partway through.
🧹 Nitpick comments (1)
packages/traceloop-sdk/src/lib/client/dataset/datasets.ts (1)
61-66: Accept numeric version inputs and normalizeImprove ergonomics by accepting number | string and normalizing to string. Also validate emptiness after coercion.
- async getVersionCSV(slug: string, version: string): Promise<string> { + async getVersionCSV(slug: string, version: string | number): Promise<string> { this.validateDatasetSlug(slug); - if (!version || typeof version !== "string") { - throw new Error("Version must be a non-empty string"); - } + const versionStr = String(version); + if (!versionStr || versionStr.trim() === "") { + throw new Error("Version must be a non-empty value"); + }And use versionStr in the URL (with encodeURIComponent) if you adopt the previous suggestion.
📜 Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
Plan: Pro
📒 Files selected for processing (5)
packages/sample-app/src/sample_dataset.ts(1 hunks)packages/sample-app/src/test_dataset_api.ts(1 hunks)packages/traceloop-sdk/src/lib/client/dataset/dataset.ts(1 hunks)packages/traceloop-sdk/src/lib/client/dataset/datasets.ts(1 hunks)packages/traceloop-sdk/test/datasets-comprehensive.test.ts(1 hunks)
🚧 Files skipped from review as they are similar to previous changes (3)
- packages/traceloop-sdk/src/lib/client/dataset/dataset.ts
- packages/sample-app/src/sample_dataset.ts
- packages/traceloop-sdk/test/datasets-comprehensive.test.ts
🧰 Additional context used
🧬 Code Graph Analysis (2)
packages/traceloop-sdk/src/lib/client/dataset/datasets.ts (3)
packages/traceloop-sdk/src/lib/client/traceloop-client.ts (1)
TraceloopClient(19-85)packages/traceloop-sdk/src/lib/interfaces/dataset.interface.ts (3)
DatasetCreateOptions(1-5)DatasetResponse(12-23)DatasetListResponse(65-68)packages/traceloop-sdk/src/lib/client/dataset/dataset.ts (3)
Dataset(16-373)slug(28-30)version(40-42)
packages/sample-app/src/test_dataset_api.ts (1)
packages/traceloop-sdk/src/lib/client/dataset/dataset.ts (1)
version(40-42)
🔇 Additional comments (9)
packages/traceloop-sdk/src/lib/client/dataset/datasets.ts (1)
37-42: Nice defensive null-safety in list()Early-returning an empty list and total: 0 avoids runtime errors for malformed/empty API responses. Good fix.
packages/sample-app/src/test_dataset_api.ts (8)
1-17: LGTM! Clean initialization with proper error handling.The initialization logic correctly sets up the Traceloop client with appropriate configuration for testing and includes proper error handling for client availability.
22-41: LGTM! Well-structured dataset listing test.Good error isolation with try-catch blocks and informative console output. The slice operation prevents excessive logging while still showing useful sample data.
43-92: LGTM! Comprehensive column testing with good data variety.The test covers both dataset creation and column operations effectively. The column definitions include different data types (string, number, boolean) and required/optional configurations, which provides good test coverage.
94-135: LGTM! Thorough row operations testing.Good coverage of both individual and batch row addition, followed by retrieval verification. The test data is consistent with the column schema defined earlier.
137-166: LGTM! CSV import functionality well tested.The CSV import test includes proper verification by checking the total row count after import. The CSV data format matches the schema and includes header handling.
168-205: LGTM! Comprehensive versioning and publishing workflow.Good test coverage of the dataset versioning lifecycle, including pre-publish state checking and post-publish verification. The version information display is informative.
208-228: LGTM! Dataset retrieval and cleanup properly tested.The retrieval by slug test verifies the dataset can be found after creation, and the deletion test provides cleanup. Good final verification step.
245-249: Process exit handling is appropriate.The main execution wrapper correctly catches unhandled errors and exits with a non-zero code, which is important for CI/CD pipeline integration.
| const csvData = await this.handleResponse(response); | ||
|
|
||
| if (typeof csvData !== "string") { | ||
| throw new Error("Expected CSV data as string from API"); | ||
| } |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
💡 Verification agent
🧩 Analysis chain
Confirm handleResponse supports text/csv; otherwise csv retrieval will fail
If handleResponse only parses JSON or returns null for non-JSON, this method will throw even on valid CSV responses. Ensure handleResponse returns response.text() when Content-Type is text/csv.
Run this script to inspect handleResponse:
If text/csv isn’t handled, consider adding:
// inside handleResponse
const ct = response.headers.get("Content-Type") || "";
if (ct.includes("text/csv")) {
return await response.text();
}Alternatively, adapt this method to bypass handleResponse for CSV:
- const csvData = await this.handleResponse(response);
+ if (!response.ok) {
+ await this.handleResponse(response); // to throw with the existing logic
+ }
+ const ct = response.headers.get("Content-Type") || "";
+ if (!ct.includes("text/csv")) {
+ throw new Error(`Expected text/csv but got: ${ct || "unknown"}`);
+ }
+ const csvData = await response.text();Happy to submit a follow-up patch once you confirm the preferred approach.
🏁 Script executed:
#!/bin/bash
# Locate and show handleResponse implementation
fd base-dataset.ts
rg -n "class BaseDataset" -A 200
rg -n "handleResponse\\(" -A 80
rg -n "Content-Type|text/csv|application/json|response\\.status|204|No Content" -nLength of output: 265304
Add CSV support to handleResponse to prevent null returns
The current handleResponse only handles JSON (application/json) and falls back to returning null for other content types—so CSV responses trigger the “Expected CSV data as string” error in getVersionCSV. You should update handleResponse to return response.text() when the Content-Type header includes text/csv.
• File: packages/traceloop-sdk/src/lib/client/dataset/base-dataset.ts
• Method: protected async handleResponse(response: Response)
• Location: around lines 30–37
Proposed change:
protected async handleResponse(response: Response) {
if (!response.ok) {
// existing error handling...
}
- const contentType = response.headers.get("content-type");
- if (contentType && contentType.includes("application/json")) {
- const rawData = await response.json();
- return transformApiResponse(rawData);
- }
- return null;
+ const contentType = response.headers.get("content-type") || "";
+ if (contentType.includes("text/csv")) {
+ // Return raw CSV for CSV endpoints
+ return await response.text();
+ }
+ if (contentType.includes("application/json")) {
+ const rawData = await response.json();
+ return transformApiResponse(rawData);
+ }
+ return null;
}This ensures that getVersionCSV receives a string and avoids the runtime type check error.
🤖 Prompt for AI Agents
In packages/traceloop-sdk/src/lib/client/dataset/base-dataset.ts around lines
30–37, the handleResponse method currently only parses JSON and returns null for
other content types, causing CSV responses to become null and break callers like
getVersionCSV; update handleResponse to detect if
response.headers.get("content-type") includes "text/csv" (case-insensitive and
allowing charset) and in that case return await response.text(); keep the
existing JSON parsing branch for application/json and preserve error handling
for non-OK responses, ensuring the method never returns null for valid
responses.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Important
Looks good to me! 👍
Reviewed a65b2b9 in 43 seconds. Click for details.
- Reviewed
16lines of code in1files - Skipped
0files when reviewing. - Skipped posting
1draft comments. View those below. - Modify your settings and rules to customize what types of comments Ellipsis leaves. And don't forget to react with 👍 or 👎 to teach Ellipsis.
1. packages/traceloop-sdk/src/lib/tracing/span-processor.ts:169
- Draft comment:
Refactoring to split the includes() argument into multiple lines improves readability. Verify that the trailing comma usage matches the project’s style guidelines. - Reason this comment was not posted:
Confidence changes required:0%<= threshold50%None
Workflow ID: wflow_snr2H7KnP51wpfAF
You can customize
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 4
♻️ Duplicate comments (1)
packages/sample-app/src/sample_dataset.ts (1)
95-97: Validate OPENAI_API_KEY before constructing the OpenAI clientAvoid runtime errors if the key is missing by checking the env var first and optionally skipping LLM calls.
- const openai = new OpenAI({ - apiKey: process.env.OPENAI_API_KEY, - }); + const openaiApiKey = process.env.OPENAI_API_KEY; + if (!openaiApiKey) { + console.warn("⚠️ OPENAI_API_KEY not found. Skipping LLM interaction simulation."); + } else { + const openai = new OpenAI({ apiKey: openaiApiKey }); + // ... use `openai` in the LLM section (see snippet below) + }Outside this range, wrap the LLM interaction block in the
elsebranch:if (!openaiApiKey) { console.warn("⚠️ OPENAI_API_KEY not found. Skipping LLM interaction simulation."); } else { const openai = new OpenAI({ apiKey: openaiApiKey }); // existing LLM interaction loop remains unchanged here }
🧹 Nitpick comments (10)
packages/sample-app/src/sample_dataset.ts (4)
100-101: Nit: capitalize “Fibonacci” in promptMinor editorial polish for sample content.
- "Write a Python function to calculate fibonacci numbers", + "Write a Python function to calculate Fibonacci numbers",
144-146: Consider batching row inserts to reduce API round-tripsInserting each row individually can be slow and rate-limit prone. If the SDK supports bulk insert (e.g.,
addRows), batch the interactions.Example approach (outside this range):
// After building `interactions` array (success + error cases), do: if (interactions.length > 0 && typeof dataset.addRows === "function") { await dataset.addRows(interactions); }If no bulk API exists, consider wrapping multiple
addRowcalls with controlled concurrency to avoid bursts.Also applies to: 164-165
226-231: Fix labels in sample output: show user_id and prompt separatelyCurrently prints the prompt under “User”. Improve clarity by labeling correctly.
- console.log(` ${index + 1}. User: "${row.data.prompt}"`); + console.log(` ${index + 1}. User: ${row.data.user_id}`); + console.log(` Prompt: "${row.data.prompt}"`); console.log( ` Response: "${String(row.data.response).substring(0, 80)}..."`, ); console.log(` Satisfaction: ${row.data.satisfaction_score}/5\n`);
183-187: Pagination is supported but no built-in stats/count endpoint—reading all rows still pulls everything into memory
dataset.getRows(limit = 100, offset = 0)does support pagination (by passinglimitandoffset), but calling it with no arguments will page through all rows and load them into memory.- The SDK does not expose a
getStats()orgetCount()method, nor does the/v2/datasets/{slug}endpoint return a total-rows count property.- As a result, computing total rows or columns today still requires fetching every page of data.
- For small sample datasets (as in this demo app) this is acceptable—but for large datasets it will not scale.
To address this at the SDK or API level, you could:
• Add a dedicated backend endpoint (e.g.GET /v2/datasets/{slug}/stats) that returns{ totalRows, totalColumns, updatedAt }and expose it asdataset.getStats()in the SDK.
• Or implement agetRowCount()method in the client that issues a minimal request (HEAD or a custom query) to retrieve just the total count without pulling row data.Until such an endpoint exists, please be aware that
getRows()will fetch all data under the hood—avoid using it for simple counts in production.packages/traceloop-sdk/src/lib/tracing/span-processor.ts (1)
169-171: Good compatibility update; refine the guard for clarity and to avoid undefined checks onincludes.Current logic broadens support across OTel versions. Small refactor improves readability and avoids calling
includeswithundefined.Apply this diff:
return (span: ReadableSpan): void => { - if ( - instrumentationLibraries && - !instrumentationLibraries.includes((span as any).instrumentationScope?.name || (span as any).instrumentationLibrary?.name) - ) { - return; - } + const libName = + (span as any).instrumentationScope?.name ?? + (span as any).instrumentationLibrary?.name; + if (instrumentationLibraries && (!libName || !instrumentationLibraries.includes(libName))) { + return; + }packages/traceloop-sdk/src/lib/tracing/index.ts (5)
31-31: Track disabled image uploader with an actionable TODO/issue.Comment-only disablement can drift. Add a TODO with a link to a tracking issue and rationale for removal/return criteria.
I can open an issue and propose a migration plan when the API stabilizes—want me to draft it?
60-64: Avoidas anyinsetConfig—use a precise config type.Casting to
anymasks API drift and breaks type safety.Apply this diff and add a precise type alias:
- openAIInstrumentation.setConfig({ - enrichTokens, - exceptionLogger, - } as any); + // Use the exact input type for setConfig to retain type safety. + openAIInstrumentation.setConfig({ + enrichTokens, + exceptionLogger, + } as OpenAIConfig);Add this near the imports (outside this hunk):
// Derive the correct config input type from the SDK to keep strong typing without coupling to internal types. type OpenAIConfig = Parameters<OpenAIInstrumentation["setConfig"]>[0];
66-70: Avoidas anyinnew OpenAIInstrumentation({...})—keep strong typing.Keep constructor config typed to catch breaking changes at compile time.
Apply this diff:
- openAIInstrumentation = new OpenAIInstrumentation({ - enrichTokens, - exceptionLogger, - } as any); + openAIInstrumentation = new OpenAIInstrumentation({ + enrichTokens, + exceptionLogger, + } as OpenAIConfig);
126-126: Mirror the TODO/issue reference for manual init path.The image uploader is also disabled here—add the same TODO/issue reference to keep both paths in sync.
132-136: Removeas anyfor manual OpenAI instrumentation config.Same type-safety concern as above—use the
OpenAIConfigalias.Apply this diff:
- openAIInstrumentation = new OpenAIInstrumentation({ - enrichTokens, - exceptionLogger, - } as any); + openAIInstrumentation = new OpenAIInstrumentation({ + enrichTokens, + exceptionLogger, + } as OpenAIConfig);
📜 Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
Plan: Pro
📒 Files selected for processing (4)
packages/sample-app/src/sample_dataset.ts(1 hunks)packages/sample-app/src/test_dataset_api.ts(1 hunks)packages/traceloop-sdk/src/lib/tracing/index.ts(6 hunks)packages/traceloop-sdk/src/lib/tracing/span-processor.ts(1 hunks)
🚧 Files skipped from review as they are similar to previous changes (1)
- packages/sample-app/src/test_dataset_api.ts
🧰 Additional context used
🧠 Learnings (1)
📚 Learning: 2025-08-10T06:42:06.412Z
Learnt from: nirga
PR: traceloop/openllmetry-js#623
File: packages/traceloop-sdk/src/lib/images/image-uploader.ts:71-78
Timestamp: 2025-08-10T06:42:06.412Z
Learning: In the Traceloop SDK's ImageUploader class (packages/traceloop-sdk/src/lib/images/image-uploader.ts), the Authorization header with bearer token IS required when uploading image data to the URL returned by the Traceloop API's `/v2/traces/{traceId}/spans/{spanId}/images` endpoint. This is not a pre-signed URL pattern but a Traceloop-specific API endpoint that maintains the same authentication requirements.
Applied to files:
packages/traceloop-sdk/src/lib/tracing/index.ts
🧬 Code Graph Analysis (1)
packages/sample-app/src/sample_dataset.ts (2)
packages/sample-app/src/sample_decorators.ts (1)
completion(29-37)packages/traceloop-sdk/src/lib/client/dataset/dataset.ts (1)
version(40-42)
🪛 GitHub Actions: CI
packages/traceloop-sdk/src/lib/tracing/span-processor.ts
[warning] 1-1: Code style issues found in packages/traceloop-sdk/src/lib/tracing/span-processor.ts. Run 'pnpm prettier --write' to fix.
packages/traceloop-sdk/src/lib/tracing/index.ts
[error] 5-5: Rollup build failed due to TypeScript error TS6133: 'Resource' is declared but its value is never read (src/lib/tracing/index.ts:5) during 'nx run @traceloop/node-server-sdk:build' (rollup -c).
🔇 Additional comments (6)
packages/sample-app/src/sample_dataset.ts (3)
10-10: No action needed:traceloopSyncEnabledis a supported SDK optionVerification found multiple references confirming that
traceloopSyncEnabledis defined and used throughout the Traceloop SDK:
- packages/traceloop-sdk/src/lib/interfaces/initialize-options.interface.ts:118 declares
traceloopSyncEnabled?: boolean;- packages/traceloop-sdk/src/lib/configuration/index.ts handles defaulting and parsing of
options.traceloopSyncEnabled- packages/traceloop-sdk/src/lib/configuration/validation.ts contains logic branching on
traceloopSyncEnabled- packages/traceloop-sdk/src/lib/prompts/registry.ts respects
traceloopSyncEnabledwhen registering promptsNo changes are required.
264-266: publish() updates the local dataset stateThe
publish()method inpackages/traceloop-sdk/src/lib/client/dataset/dataset.tsassigns the API response back to the instance’s internal data (this._data = data), sodataset.publishedwill correctly reflect the “Published” status immediately afterawait dataset.publish(). No extra refresh or returned-value handling is required.
88-89: No changes needed:addColumnalready accepts an array
The SDK’saddColumnmethod is defined asasync addColumn(columns: ColumnDefinition[]): Promise<ColumnResponse[]>and its tests call it with an array of columns, confirming it supports batch addition. You can safely keep:
await dataset.addColumn(columnsToAdd);packages/traceloop-sdk/src/lib/tracing/span-processor.ts (1)
1-181: Prettier formatting applied
The file has been formatted with Prettier (pnpm prettier --write packages/traceloop-sdk/src/lib/tracing/span-processor.ts), so the CI style checks should now pass.packages/traceloop-sdk/src/lib/tracing/index.ts (2)
296-299: LGTM: Switching toResourcedirectly is correct and future-proof.Using
new Resource({ [ATTR_SERVICE_NAME]: ... })aligns with OTel patterns and removes the dependency onresourceFromAttributes.
5-5: No unusedResourceimports detected; comment can be ignored.The only
import { Resource } from "@opentelemetry/resources"is in
packages/traceloop-sdk/src/lib/tracing/index.ts
and it’s used on line 296 (new Resource({ … })). No other files importResourcewithout usage.Likely an incorrect or invalid review comment.
| traceloop.initialize({ | ||
| appName: "sample_dataset", | ||
| apiKey: process.env.TRACELOOP_API_KEY, | ||
| disableBatch: true, | ||
| traceloopSyncEnabled: true, | ||
| }); |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
🛠️ Refactor suggestion
Fail fast if TRACELOOP_API_KEY is missing
Prevent confusing runtime behavior by validating the Traceloop API key before initializing.
// Initialize Traceloop SDK
- traceloop.initialize({
+ const traceloopApiKey = process.env.TRACELOOP_API_KEY;
+ if (!traceloopApiKey) {
+ console.warn("⚠️ TRACELOOP_API_KEY not set. Skipping dataset demo.");
+ return;
+ }
+ traceloop.initialize({
appName: "sample_dataset",
- apiKey: process.env.TRACELOOP_API_KEY,
+ apiKey: traceloopApiKey,
disableBatch: true,
traceloopSyncEnabled: true,
});📝 Committable suggestion
‼️ IMPORTANT
Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.
| traceloop.initialize({ | |
| appName: "sample_dataset", | |
| apiKey: process.env.TRACELOOP_API_KEY, | |
| disableBatch: true, | |
| traceloopSyncEnabled: true, | |
| }); | |
| // Initialize Traceloop SDK | |
| const traceloopApiKey = process.env.TRACELOOP_API_KEY; | |
| if (!traceloopApiKey) { | |
| console.warn("⚠️ TRACELOOP_API_KEY not set. Skipping dataset demo."); | |
| return; | |
| } | |
| traceloop.initialize({ | |
| appName: "sample_dataset", | |
| apiKey: traceloopApiKey, | |
| disableBatch: true, | |
| traceloopSyncEnabled: true, | |
| }); |
🤖 Prompt for AI Agents
In packages/sample-app/src/sample_dataset.ts around lines 6 to 11, the Traceloop
API key is used directly which can lead to confusing runtime behavior if
TRACELOOP_API_KEY is missing; add a guard before traceloop.initialize that
checks process.env.TRACELOOP_API_KEY for existence/non-empty, and if missing
either throw a descriptive Error or log a clear message and call
process.exit(1), then pass the validated value into traceloop.initialize so
initialization only runs when a valid key is present.
| try { | ||
| const versions = await dataset.getVersions(); | ||
| console.log(` • Total versions: ${versions.total}`); | ||
|
|
||
| if (versions.versions.length > 0) { | ||
| console.log(" • Available versions:"); | ||
| versions.versions.forEach((version) => { | ||
| console.log( | ||
| ` - ${version.version} (published: ${version.publishedAt})`, | ||
| ); | ||
| }); | ||
| } else { | ||
| console.log(" • No published versions yet"); | ||
| } | ||
| } catch (error) { | ||
| console.log(` ⚠️ Could not retrieve versions: ${error.message}`); | ||
| } |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Type-safe error handling in catch block
error.message on an unknown catch variable can fail TypeScript compilation and at runtime if not an Error.
- } catch (error) {
- console.log(` ⚠️ Could not retrieve versions: ${error.message}`);
+ } catch (error: unknown) {
+ const msg = error instanceof Error ? error.message : String(error);
+ console.log(` ⚠️ Could not retrieve versions: ${msg}`);
}📝 Committable suggestion
‼️ IMPORTANT
Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.
| try { | |
| const versions = await dataset.getVersions(); | |
| console.log(` • Total versions: ${versions.total}`); | |
| if (versions.versions.length > 0) { | |
| console.log(" • Available versions:"); | |
| versions.versions.forEach((version) => { | |
| console.log( | |
| ` - ${version.version} (published: ${version.publishedAt})`, | |
| ); | |
| }); | |
| } else { | |
| console.log(" • No published versions yet"); | |
| } | |
| } catch (error) { | |
| console.log(` ⚠️ Could not retrieve versions: ${error.message}`); | |
| } | |
| try { | |
| const versions = await dataset.getVersions(); | |
| console.log(` • Total versions: ${versions.total}`); | |
| if (versions.versions.length > 0) { | |
| console.log(" • Available versions:"); | |
| versions.versions.forEach((version) => { | |
| console.log( | |
| ` - ${version.version} (published: ${version.publishedAt})`, | |
| ); | |
| }); | |
| } else { | |
| console.log(" • No published versions yet"); | |
| } | |
| } catch (error: unknown) { | |
| const msg = error instanceof Error ? error.message : String(error); | |
| console.log(` ⚠️ Could not retrieve versions: ${msg}`); | |
| } |
🤖 Prompt for AI Agents
In packages/sample-app/src/sample_dataset.ts around lines 236 to 252, the catch
block assumes error has a .message which is not type-safe; change the catch
signature to catch (error: unknown) and guard the value before accessing
.message — e.g. if (error instanceof Error) use error.message, otherwise convert
to a string with String(error) (or JSON/stringify/inspect) and include that in
the log so TypeScript compiles and you never access .message on a non-Error.
| console.error("❌ Error in dataset operations:", error.message); | ||
| if (error.stack) { | ||
| console.error("Stack trace:", error.stack); | ||
| } | ||
| } |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Type-safe error handling in top-level try/catch
Avoid assuming error is an Error.
- } catch (error) {
- console.error("❌ Error in dataset operations:", error.message);
- if (error.stack) {
- console.error("Stack trace:", error.stack);
- }
+ } catch (error: unknown) {
+ const err = error instanceof Error ? error : new Error(String(error));
+ console.error("❌ Error in dataset operations:", err.message);
+ if (err.stack) {
+ console.error("Stack trace:", err.stack);
+ }
}📝 Committable suggestion
‼️ IMPORTANT
Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.
| console.error("❌ Error in dataset operations:", error.message); | |
| if (error.stack) { | |
| console.error("Stack trace:", error.stack); | |
| } | |
| } | |
| } catch (error: unknown) { | |
| const err = error instanceof Error ? error : new Error(String(error)); | |
| console.error("❌ Error in dataset operations:", err.message); | |
| if (err.stack) { | |
| console.error("Stack trace:", err.stack); | |
| } | |
| } |
🤖 Prompt for AI Agents
In packages/sample-app/src/sample_dataset.ts around lines 309 to 313, the
top-level catch assumes `error` is an Error and accesses .message/.stack
directly; change the catch to accept unknown, then perform a type check (e.g.,
if (error instanceof Error) { log error.message and error.stack } else { log a
safe stringified representation like String(error) or JSON.stringify(error)
fallback) ) so logging is type-safe and avoids runtime exceptions. Ensure the
catch signature and subsequent logging use the safe checks and fallbacks.
| main().catch((error) => { | ||
| console.error("💥 Application failed:", error.message); | ||
| process.exit(1); | ||
| }); |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Type-safe error handling in main().catch
Same issue: error.message on an untyped catch variable.
-main().catch((error) => {
- console.error("💥 Application failed:", error.message);
- process.exit(1);
-});
+main().catch((error: unknown) => {
+ const err = error instanceof Error ? error : new Error(String(error));
+ console.error("💥 Application failed:", err.message);
+ process.exit(1);
+});📝 Committable suggestion
‼️ IMPORTANT
Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.
| main().catch((error) => { | |
| console.error("💥 Application failed:", error.message); | |
| process.exit(1); | |
| }); | |
| main().catch((error: unknown) => { | |
| const err = error instanceof Error ? error : new Error(String(error)); | |
| console.error("💥 Application failed:", err.message); | |
| process.exit(1); | |
| }); |
🤖 Prompt for AI Agents
In packages/sample-app/src/sample_dataset.ts around lines 317 to 320, the catch
handler uses error.message on an untyped catch variable which is unsafe; change
the handler to normalize the caught value (e.g. check if error instanceof Error
and use error.message, otherwise use String(error)) and log that normalized
message (or the full error object) instead of assuming error.message so the code
is type-safe and won't crash on non-Error throws.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 0
🧹 Nitpick comments (1)
packages/traceloop-sdk/src/lib/tracing/span-processor.ts (1)
168-176: Make instrumentation name resolution explicit and safer (use nullish coalescing and early-return)Small readability and safety win: resolve the library name once with nullish coalescing (avoids the subtle “empty string” edge case of
||), then early-return if it’s missing or not allowed. This also avoids repeating theanycast inline.Apply this diff:
- if ( - instrumentationLibraries && - !instrumentationLibraries.includes( - (span as any).instrumentationScope?.name || - (span as any).instrumentationLibrary?.name, - ) - ) { - return; - } + const libName = + (span as any).instrumentationScope?.name ?? + (span as any).instrumentationLibrary?.name; + if (instrumentationLibraries && (!libName || !instrumentationLibraries.includes(libName))) { + return; + }Optionally, consider extracting a tiny helper to localize the
anycast:function getInstrumentationLibName(span: ReadableSpan): string | undefined { const s = span as any; return s?.instrumentationScope?.name ?? s?.instrumentationLibrary?.name; }
📜 Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
Plan: Pro
📒 Files selected for processing (1)
packages/traceloop-sdk/src/lib/tracing/span-processor.ts(1 hunks)
🔇 Additional comments (1)
packages/traceloop-sdk/src/lib/tracing/span-processor.ts (1)
170-173: Back-compat fallback to instrumentationLibrary is a solid improvementUsing instrumentationScope?.name with a fallback to instrumentationLibrary?.name makes the filter resilient across OpenTelemetry versions. Good call.
Important
Introduces a comprehensive dataset management API to the SDK, including dataset creation, updating, deletion, versioning, and extensive testing.
base-dataset.ts,dataset.ts, anddatasets.ts.response-transformer.ts.TraceloopClientintraceloop-client.ts.Datasets,Dataset,Column, andRowclasses for dataset operations.datasets-comprehensive.test.tsanddatasets-final.test.ts.This description was created by
for a65b2b9. You can customize this summary. It will automatically update as commits are pushed.
Summary by CodeRabbit
New Features
New Scripts / Sample App
Tests