Open
Conversation
Contributor
|
I'll install it locally and give a peek - casual glance at the code looks fine to me. Thanks so much for the PR! |
added 2 commits
December 22, 2025 15:15
errors were caused by missing required Tree-sitter query captures in POD language configuration
Author
|
Hi, any news with that? |
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
2 participants
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Hi,
Here's my implementation of POD rendering.
I have no idea, how this could be tested. I ran it a day in my editor, switched themes and so on, and it rendered my production code nicely. Anyway, I am open to suggestions!
Cheers,
Jan