- 
          
 - 
                Notifications
    
You must be signed in to change notification settings  - Fork 874
 
fix: use default retry settings when no catchError handlers are defined #1852
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Conversation
          
 | 
    
          
WalkthroughThis update refines database querying, error handling, and retry logic. In the webapp service, a select clause now limits database output to four specific fields. In the core worker module, a new constant centralizes retry logic in error handling, and the corresponding test has been updated to support additional retry configuration. Furthermore, a new file introduces a task with exponential backoff retry behavior, simulating failures until a configured condition is met. Changes
 Sequence Diagram(s)sequenceDiagram
    participant Client
    participant RetryTask
    Client->>RetryTask: run(payload with failCount)
    loop Retry Attempts (while current attempt <= failCount)
        RetryTask->>RetryTask: Log current attempt
        alt Attempt still failing
            RetryTask->>RetryTask: Throw error & Log warning
        end
    end
    RetryTask->>Client: Return result with number of attempts
    Suggested reviewers
 Poem
 📜 Recent review detailsConfiguration used: CodeRabbit UI 📒 Files selected for processing (4)
 ⏰ Context from checks skipped due to timeout of 90000ms (5)
 🔇 Additional comments (8)
 ✨ Finishing Touches
 Thanks for using CodeRabbit! It's free for OSS, and your support helps us grow. If you like it, consider giving us a shout-out. 🪧 TipsChatThere are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit: 
 Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments. CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)
 Other keywords and placeholders
 CodeRabbit Configuration File (
 | 
    
Summary by CodeRabbit