Skip to content

Conversation

ericallam
Copy link
Member

No description provided.

Copy link

changeset-bot bot commented Jul 1, 2025

⚠️ No Changeset found

Latest commit: af883c5

Merging this PR will not cause a version bump for any packages. If these changes should not result in a new version, you're good to go. If these changes should result in a version bump, you need to add a changeset.

Click here to learn what changesets are, and how to add one.

Click here if you're a maintainer who wants to add a changeset to this PR

Copy link
Contributor

coderabbitai bot commented Jul 1, 2025

Walkthrough

The continueRunIfUnblocked method in the WaitpointSystem class was refactored to run its entire logic inside a run-level lock, ensuring serialized processing per run ID. It begins by fetching blocking waitpoints and returns "blocked" if any are incomplete. The method then retrieves the run and uses a comprehensive switch statement to handle all possible execution statuses explicitly. Depending on the status, it either skips, processes, reacquires concurrency, re-enqueues the run, or throws errors for invalid states. Blocking waitpoints are deleted inside the lock if present. The method returns "blocked", "unblocked", or "skipped" based on the processing outcome.


📜 Recent review details

Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
Plan: Pro

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between e3049c8 and af883c5.

📒 Files selected for processing (1)
  • internal-packages/run-engine/src/engine/systems/waitpointSystem.ts (2 hunks)
🚧 Files skipped from review as they are similar to previous changes (1)
  • internal-packages/run-engine/src/engine/systems/waitpointSystem.ts
⏰ Context from checks skipped due to timeout of 90000ms (25)
  • GitHub Check: units / internal / 🧪 Unit Tests: Internal (6, 8)
  • GitHub Check: units / internal / 🧪 Unit Tests: Internal (8, 8)
  • GitHub Check: units / internal / 🧪 Unit Tests: Internal (4, 8)
  • GitHub Check: units / internal / 🧪 Unit Tests: Internal (3, 8)
  • GitHub Check: units / internal / 🧪 Unit Tests: Internal (5, 8)
  • GitHub Check: units / internal / 🧪 Unit Tests: Internal (7, 8)
  • GitHub Check: units / internal / 🧪 Unit Tests: Internal (1, 8)
  • GitHub Check: units / webapp / 🧪 Unit Tests: Webapp (10, 10)
  • GitHub Check: units / webapp / 🧪 Unit Tests: Webapp (8, 10)
  • GitHub Check: units / internal / 🧪 Unit Tests: Internal (2, 8)
  • GitHub Check: units / webapp / 🧪 Unit Tests: Webapp (9, 10)
  • GitHub Check: units / webapp / 🧪 Unit Tests: Webapp (6, 10)
  • GitHub Check: units / webapp / 🧪 Unit Tests: Webapp (2, 10)
  • GitHub Check: units / webapp / 🧪 Unit Tests: Webapp (3, 10)
  • GitHub Check: units / webapp / 🧪 Unit Tests: Webapp (7, 10)
  • GitHub Check: units / webapp / 🧪 Unit Tests: Webapp (1, 10)
  • GitHub Check: e2e / 🧪 CLI v3 tests (windows-latest - npm)
  • GitHub Check: units / webapp / 🧪 Unit Tests: Webapp (4, 10)
  • GitHub Check: units / webapp / 🧪 Unit Tests: Webapp (5, 10)
  • GitHub Check: units / packages / 🧪 Unit Tests: Packages (1, 1)
  • GitHub Check: e2e / 🧪 CLI v3 tests (windows-latest - pnpm)
  • GitHub Check: e2e / 🧪 CLI v3 tests (ubuntu-latest - pnpm)
  • GitHub Check: typecheck / typecheck
  • GitHub Check: e2e / 🧪 CLI v3 tests (ubuntu-latest - npm)
  • GitHub Check: Analyze (javascript-typescript)
✨ Finishing Touches
  • 📝 Generate Docstrings

Thanks for using CodeRabbit! It's free for OSS, and your support helps us grow. If you like it, consider giving us a shout-out.

❤️ Share
🪧 Tips

Chat

There are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:

  • Review comments: Directly reply to a review comment made by CodeRabbit. Example:
    • I pushed a fix in commit <commit_id>, please review it.
    • Explain this complex logic.
    • Open a follow-up GitHub issue for this discussion.
  • Files and specific lines of code (under the "Files changed" tab): Tag @coderabbitai in a new review comment at the desired location with your query. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai explain this code block.
    • @coderabbitai modularize this function.
  • PR comments: Tag @coderabbitai in a new PR comment to ask questions about the PR branch. For the best results, please provide a very specific query, as very limited context is provided in this mode. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai gather interesting stats about this repository and render them as a table. Additionally, render a pie chart showing the language distribution in the codebase.
    • @coderabbitai read src/utils.ts and explain its main purpose.
    • @coderabbitai read the files in the src/scheduler package and generate a class diagram using mermaid and a README in the markdown format.
    • @coderabbitai help me debug CodeRabbit configuration file.

Support

Need help? Create a ticket on our support page for assistance with any issues or questions.

Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments.

CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)

  • @coderabbitai pause to pause the reviews on a PR.
  • @coderabbitai resume to resume the paused reviews.
  • @coderabbitai review to trigger an incremental review. This is useful when automatic reviews are disabled for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai full review to do a full review from scratch and review all the files again.
  • @coderabbitai summary to regenerate the summary of the PR.
  • @coderabbitai generate docstrings to generate docstrings for this PR.
  • @coderabbitai generate sequence diagram to generate a sequence diagram of the changes in this PR.
  • @coderabbitai resolve resolve all the CodeRabbit review comments.
  • @coderabbitai configuration to show the current CodeRabbit configuration for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai help to get help.

Other keywords and placeholders

  • Add @coderabbitai ignore anywhere in the PR description to prevent this PR from being reviewed.
  • Add @coderabbitai summary to generate the high-level summary at a specific location in the PR description.
  • Add @coderabbitai anywhere in the PR title to generate the title automatically.

CodeRabbit Configuration File (.coderabbit.yaml)

  • You can programmatically configure CodeRabbit by adding a .coderabbit.yaml file to the root of your repository.
  • Please see the configuration documentation for more information.
  • If your editor has YAML language server enabled, you can add the path at the top of this file to enable auto-completion and validation: # yaml-language-server: $schema=https://coderabbit.ai/integrations/schema.v2.json

Documentation and Community

  • Visit our Documentation for detailed information on how to use CodeRabbit.
  • Join our Discord Community to get help, request features, and share feedback.
  • Follow us on X/Twitter for updates and announcements.

Copy link
Contributor

@coderabbitai coderabbitai bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Actionable comments posted: 0

🧹 Nitpick comments (1)
internal-packages/run-engine/src/engine/systems/waitpointSystem.ts (1)

493-745: Consider decomposing this method for improved maintainability.

While the implementation is correct, the method has grown to 250+ lines. Consider extracting the status-specific logic into separate private methods (e.g., handleExecutingWithWaitpoints, handleSuspended, etc.) to improve readability and testability.

📜 Review details

Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
Plan: Pro

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between 4a79b3b and e3049c8.

📒 Files selected for processing (1)
  • internal-packages/run-engine/src/engine/systems/waitpointSystem.ts (1 hunks)
🧰 Additional context used
📓 Path-based instructions (1)
`**/*.{ts,tsx}`: Always prefer using isomorphic code like fetch, ReadableStream,...

**/*.{ts,tsx}: Always prefer using isomorphic code like fetch, ReadableStream, etc. instead of Node.js specific code
For TypeScript, we usually use types over interfaces
Avoid enums
Use strict mode
No default exports, use function declarations

📄 Source: CodeRabbit Inference Engine (.github/copilot-instructions.md)

List of files the instruction was applied to:

  • internal-packages/run-engine/src/engine/systems/waitpointSystem.ts
🧠 Learnings (1)
📓 Common learnings
Learnt from: matt-aitken
PR: triggerdotdev/trigger.dev#2025
File: internal-packages/database/prisma/schema.prisma:2103-2105
Timestamp: 2025-05-06T17:37:33.845Z
Learning: The `resolver` field in the Waitpoint model is used purely for filtering in the dashboard and doesn't change the underlying functionality of waitpoints. It provides additional classification (ENGINE, TOKEN, HTTP_CALLBACK) while the existing `type` field (MANUAL, DATETIME, etc.) continues to define the fundamental nature of the waitpoint.
⏰ Context from checks skipped due to timeout of 90000ms (25)
  • GitHub Check: units / internal / 🧪 Unit Tests: Internal (8, 8)
  • GitHub Check: units / internal / 🧪 Unit Tests: Internal (4, 8)
  • GitHub Check: units / internal / 🧪 Unit Tests: Internal (5, 8)
  • GitHub Check: units / internal / 🧪 Unit Tests: Internal (1, 8)
  • GitHub Check: units / internal / 🧪 Unit Tests: Internal (6, 8)
  • GitHub Check: units / internal / 🧪 Unit Tests: Internal (7, 8)
  • GitHub Check: units / webapp / 🧪 Unit Tests: Webapp (10, 10)
  • GitHub Check: units / webapp / 🧪 Unit Tests: Webapp (4, 10)
  • GitHub Check: units / webapp / 🧪 Unit Tests: Webapp (7, 10)
  • GitHub Check: units / webapp / 🧪 Unit Tests: Webapp (1, 10)
  • GitHub Check: units / internal / 🧪 Unit Tests: Internal (3, 8)
  • GitHub Check: units / webapp / 🧪 Unit Tests: Webapp (9, 10)
  • GitHub Check: units / internal / 🧪 Unit Tests: Internal (2, 8)
  • GitHub Check: units / webapp / 🧪 Unit Tests: Webapp (8, 10)
  • GitHub Check: units / webapp / 🧪 Unit Tests: Webapp (2, 10)
  • GitHub Check: units / webapp / 🧪 Unit Tests: Webapp (3, 10)
  • GitHub Check: units / webapp / 🧪 Unit Tests: Webapp (6, 10)
  • GitHub Check: units / webapp / 🧪 Unit Tests: Webapp (5, 10)
  • GitHub Check: units / packages / 🧪 Unit Tests: Packages (1, 1)
  • GitHub Check: e2e / 🧪 CLI v3 tests (ubuntu-latest - npm)
  • GitHub Check: e2e / 🧪 CLI v3 tests (windows-latest - npm)
  • GitHub Check: e2e / 🧪 CLI v3 tests (windows-latest - pnpm)
  • GitHub Check: typecheck / typecheck
  • GitHub Check: e2e / 🧪 CLI v3 tests (ubuntu-latest - pnpm)
  • GitHub Check: Analyze (javascript-typescript)
🔇 Additional comments (2)
internal-packages/run-engine/src/engine/systems/waitpointSystem.ts (2)

504-504: Great improvement: Lock wrapping prevents race conditions.

Moving the entire method logic inside the run-specific lock ensures serialized execution per run ID, effectively eliminating potential race conditions where waitpoint status could change between check and action.


555-726: Well-structured status handling with comprehensive coverage.

The switch statement effectively replaces the previous conditional logic with explicit handling for all execution statuses. The defensive programming in the SUSPENDED case (checking for checkpoint ID) and the fail-fast default case are particularly good practices.

Comment on lines 722 to 724
throw new Error(
`continueRunIfUnblocked: invalid execution status: ${snapshot.executionStatus}`
);
Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

@ericallam we don't want an assertNever here to catch at build time?

@ericallam ericallam merged commit 124435e into main Jul 1, 2025
33 checks passed
@ericallam ericallam deleted the v4-stuck-run-fixes branch July 1, 2025 15:34
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants