-
-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 853
Eliminate race conditions in continueRunIfUnblocked to prevent stuck runs #2217
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Conversation
|
WalkthroughThe 📜 Recent review detailsConfiguration used: CodeRabbit UI 📒 Files selected for processing (1)
🚧 Files skipped from review as they are similar to previous changes (1)
⏰ Context from checks skipped due to timeout of 90000ms (25)
✨ Finishing Touches
Thanks for using CodeRabbit! It's free for OSS, and your support helps us grow. If you like it, consider giving us a shout-out. 🪧 TipsChatThere are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:
SupportNeed help? Create a ticket on our support page for assistance with any issues or questions. Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments. CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)
Other keywords and placeholders
CodeRabbit Configuration File (
|
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Actionable comments posted: 0
🧹 Nitpick comments (1)
internal-packages/run-engine/src/engine/systems/waitpointSystem.ts (1)
493-745
: Consider decomposing this method for improved maintainability.While the implementation is correct, the method has grown to 250+ lines. Consider extracting the status-specific logic into separate private methods (e.g.,
handleExecutingWithWaitpoints
,handleSuspended
, etc.) to improve readability and testability.
📜 Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
Plan: Pro
📒 Files selected for processing (1)
internal-packages/run-engine/src/engine/systems/waitpointSystem.ts
(1 hunks)
🧰 Additional context used
📓 Path-based instructions (1)
`**/*.{ts,tsx}`: Always prefer using isomorphic code like fetch, ReadableStream,...
**/*.{ts,tsx}
: Always prefer using isomorphic code like fetch, ReadableStream, etc. instead of Node.js specific code
For TypeScript, we usually use types over interfaces
Avoid enums
Use strict mode
No default exports, use function declarations
📄 Source: CodeRabbit Inference Engine (.github/copilot-instructions.md)
List of files the instruction was applied to:
internal-packages/run-engine/src/engine/systems/waitpointSystem.ts
🧠 Learnings (1)
📓 Common learnings
Learnt from: matt-aitken
PR: triggerdotdev/trigger.dev#2025
File: internal-packages/database/prisma/schema.prisma:2103-2105
Timestamp: 2025-05-06T17:37:33.845Z
Learning: The `resolver` field in the Waitpoint model is used purely for filtering in the dashboard and doesn't change the underlying functionality of waitpoints. It provides additional classification (ENGINE, TOKEN, HTTP_CALLBACK) while the existing `type` field (MANUAL, DATETIME, etc.) continues to define the fundamental nature of the waitpoint.
⏰ Context from checks skipped due to timeout of 90000ms (25)
- GitHub Check: units / internal / 🧪 Unit Tests: Internal (8, 8)
- GitHub Check: units / internal / 🧪 Unit Tests: Internal (4, 8)
- GitHub Check: units / internal / 🧪 Unit Tests: Internal (5, 8)
- GitHub Check: units / internal / 🧪 Unit Tests: Internal (1, 8)
- GitHub Check: units / internal / 🧪 Unit Tests: Internal (6, 8)
- GitHub Check: units / internal / 🧪 Unit Tests: Internal (7, 8)
- GitHub Check: units / webapp / 🧪 Unit Tests: Webapp (10, 10)
- GitHub Check: units / webapp / 🧪 Unit Tests: Webapp (4, 10)
- GitHub Check: units / webapp / 🧪 Unit Tests: Webapp (7, 10)
- GitHub Check: units / webapp / 🧪 Unit Tests: Webapp (1, 10)
- GitHub Check: units / internal / 🧪 Unit Tests: Internal (3, 8)
- GitHub Check: units / webapp / 🧪 Unit Tests: Webapp (9, 10)
- GitHub Check: units / internal / 🧪 Unit Tests: Internal (2, 8)
- GitHub Check: units / webapp / 🧪 Unit Tests: Webapp (8, 10)
- GitHub Check: units / webapp / 🧪 Unit Tests: Webapp (2, 10)
- GitHub Check: units / webapp / 🧪 Unit Tests: Webapp (3, 10)
- GitHub Check: units / webapp / 🧪 Unit Tests: Webapp (6, 10)
- GitHub Check: units / webapp / 🧪 Unit Tests: Webapp (5, 10)
- GitHub Check: units / packages / 🧪 Unit Tests: Packages (1, 1)
- GitHub Check: e2e / 🧪 CLI v3 tests (ubuntu-latest - npm)
- GitHub Check: e2e / 🧪 CLI v3 tests (windows-latest - npm)
- GitHub Check: e2e / 🧪 CLI v3 tests (windows-latest - pnpm)
- GitHub Check: typecheck / typecheck
- GitHub Check: e2e / 🧪 CLI v3 tests (ubuntu-latest - pnpm)
- GitHub Check: Analyze (javascript-typescript)
🔇 Additional comments (2)
internal-packages/run-engine/src/engine/systems/waitpointSystem.ts (2)
504-504
: Great improvement: Lock wrapping prevents race conditions.Moving the entire method logic inside the run-specific lock ensures serialized execution per run ID, effectively eliminating potential race conditions where waitpoint status could change between check and action.
555-726
: Well-structured status handling with comprehensive coverage.The switch statement effectively replaces the previous conditional logic with explicit handling for all execution statuses. The defensive programming in the SUSPENDED case (checking for checkpoint ID) and the fail-fast default case are particularly good practices.
throw new Error( | ||
`continueRunIfUnblocked: invalid execution status: ${snapshot.executionStatus}` | ||
); |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
@ericallam we don't want an assertNever here to catch at build time?
No description provided.