Skip to content

Conversation

@Flash-LHR
Copy link
Contributor

No description provided.

@codecov
Copy link

codecov bot commented Nov 25, 2025

Codecov Report

❌ Patch coverage is 88.03089% with 31 lines in your changes missing coverage. Please review.
✅ Project coverage is 87.18481%. Comparing base (bd32622) to head (bf5285f).
⚠️ Report is 15 commits behind head on main.

Files with missing lines Patch % Lines
...luation/evaluator/tooltrajectory/tooltrajectory.go 0.00000% 11 Missing ⚠️
.../metric/criterion/tooltrajectory/tooltrajectory.go 92.80576% 5 Missing and 5 partials ⚠️
evaluation/evalresult/local/local.go 50.00000% 4 Missing and 1 partial ⚠️
evaluation/service/internal/inference/inference.go 77.27273% 4 Missing and 1 partial ⚠️
Additional details and impacted files
@@                 Coverage Diff                 @@
##                main        #742         +/-   ##
===================================================
- Coverage   87.68042%   87.18481%   -0.49561%     
===================================================
  Files            276         282          +6     
  Lines          35334       36129        +795     
===================================================
+ Hits           30981       31499        +518     
- Misses          2802        3047        +245     
- Partials        1551        1583         +32     
Flag Coverage Δ
unittests 87.18481% <88.03089%> (-0.49561%) ⬇️

Flags with carried forward coverage won't be shown. Click here to find out more.

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

🚀 New features to boost your workflow:
  • ❄️ Test Analytics: Detect flaky tests, report on failures, and find test suite problems.

@Flash-LHR Flash-LHR changed the title [WIP] {evaluation, docs, examples}: support tool criterion {evaluation, docs, examples}: support tool criterion Nov 25, 2025
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant