Add SBOM Explorer feature description

[queria]

Describe expected tests of behavior for SBOM Explorer page.

[mrrajan]

@queria Please find the inline comments and suggestions. I have requested to split scenarios with multiple verification into individuals. Please let me know WDYT.

[mrrajan]

I have added a suggestion.

IMHO, we should split the multiple when statements on a scenario into smaller ones and remove the redundant steps or steps with no functional purpose - these changes are better to have and can be carried later as well.

[queria]

I have added a suggestion.

IMHO, we should split the multiple when statements on a scenario into smaller ones and remove the redundant steps or steps with no functional purpose - these changes are better to have and can be carried later as well.

// For some reason I am unable to reply inline some of the comments, so will put it in single one here.

Will split most of the scenarios, though i'm quite sure it will result in very inefficient test execution, will have to find some workaround for that in code then. With one exception - filtering packages and clearing the filter input - as there i believe we want to validate both, that list was filtered and that it was reset back.

Yes I agree with the looking at content is likely redundant, as some of the something is visible when next steps does additional assert of its content so there is no need for first step (thanks @carlosthe19916 for pointing it out).

[mrrajan]

LGTM