Update asv

[hossam26644]

Updated the code to work with msprime 1.x syntax (sim_ancestry instead of simulate), assuming that benchmarking against msprime 0.x is not longer necessary.
Included time and memory tests for stop_at_local_mrca=False
updated the hashes list in the file, and included a line to run from a hashfile instead of just going all commits in order for an hour

[codecov]

Codecov Report

✅ All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests.
✅ Project coverage is 91.22%. Comparing base (1b2f7fd) to head (508e808).
⚠️ Report is 2 commits behind head on main.

Additional details and impacted files

@@           Coverage Diff           @@
##             main    #2437   +/-   ##
=======================================
  Coverage   91.22%   91.22%           
=======================================
  Files          20       20           
  Lines       11847    11847           
  Branches     2300     2300           
=======================================
  Hits        10807    10807           
  Misses        569      569           
  Partials      471      471           

Flag	Coverage Δ
C	91.22% <ø> (ø)
python	98.63% <ø> (ø)

Flags with carried forward coverage won't be shown. Click here to find out more.

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

🚀 New features to boost your workflow:

• ❄️ Test Analytics: Detect flaky tests, report on failures, and find test suite problems.

[jeromekelleher]

Spotted some issues.

I was also hoping that we could do basically all of the benchmarks with an object-oriented approach, where we subclass like

class Hudson(LargeSimulationBenchmark):
     def _large_sample_size_params(self):
            return {"sample_size": 10**6, ...}
      def _run_large_sample_size(self):
             self.run(self._large_sample_size_params())
      def run(self, params):
             return msprime.sim_ancestry(**params)

class HudsonOverRoot(Hudson)
       def run(self, params):
             return msprime.sim_ancestry(**{stop_at_local_mrca=False, **params})

That way we'll get decent coverage on the performance implications (which are not obvious to me - it's a deep change).

[hossam26644]

Very neat suggestion. I just took the liberty to propose a small structural change. Let me know what do you think.

[jeromekelleher]

LGTM, just needs a squash

[hossam26644]

Ready now