Fix: Correct per-class evaluation logic#17
Open
ardaerendogru wants to merge 1 commit intotue-mps:masterfrom
Open
Fix: Correct per-class evaluation logic#17ardaerendogru wants to merge 1 commit intotue-mps:masterfrom
ardaerendogru wants to merge 1 commit intotue-mps:masterfrom
Conversation
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
1 participant
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Currently, when log_per_class is enabled, metrics such as Panoptic Quality (PQ), Segmentation Quality (SQ), and Recognition Quality (RQ) are logged using a simple sequential index for the class (e.g., _pq_class_0, _pq_class_1, etc.). This index does not directly correspond to the actual semantic class ID, making it difficult to interpret which specific class a logged metric refers to, especially if the evaluated classes are not contiguous or their order in the pq/sq/rq tensors doesn't trivially map to their semantic meaning.